N&PD Moderators: Skorpio
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.I Like to Draw Pictures of Random Molecules
sekio
Bluelight Crew
Even Shulgin himself pointed out, SAR is not always as simple as "Compound X plus group Y makes super potent compound XY, so compound Z plus group Y makes super potent compound ZY".
There is also the problem of diminishing returns one runs into. Compounds can only be made to bind so tightly before any changes you make to them decrease activity.
A huge part of LSD's activity comes not from the fact that it's "both a phenethylamine and a tryptamine" - that's mostly just fun trivia - but from the fact that the whole molecule is almost entirely flat and planar.
Another curio is that any modification of the amide seems to greatly decrease activity.
Another other thing to notice is the "phenethylamine" in LSD is a tertiary amine, a sure sign of doom in the traditional PEA world.countyourculture
Greenlighter
Thoughts?Sturnam
Bluelighter
Thoughts?
If I'm reading those letters correctly, none of those are even phenethylamines....not a single one has a nitrogen. And without that, no activity. Plus, for the second one, tert-butyl groups in the 4 position makes it inactive, and having hydroxyl groups instead of methoxies greatly reduces activity, although a 2-hydroxy might be ok.
So, no, no, and no. For several reasons.countyourculture
Greenlighter
Epsilon Alpha
Bluelighter
sekio
Bluelight Crew
sekio
Bluelight Crew
The other two are closely related to antioxidants like BHT & the quinonesLimpet_Chicken
Bluelighter
cannibalsnail
Bluelighter
cannibalsnail
Bluelighter
sekio
Bluelight Crew
The FLY-NBOMe compounds, if I remember right, are actually less potent than the plain NBOMes.cannibalsnail
Bluelighter
Didn't realize the FLY-NBOMe's were less potent though. Seen a few people attempting to put in for 2c-b-fly-NBOMe recently, their reasoning now eludes me if 2c-b-fly would simply be more potent and cost-effective... and it's legal, so its not an issue like that.