• CD Moderators: someguyontheinternet
  • Cannabis Discussion Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules

How young is too young?

wArEhOuSePuNk said:
Did you honestly say "drug induced psychosis";) from smoking pot!! That has to be the most ignorant thing ive heard in a long time. Wow! Holy Shit!!! Also, You dont even sound or spell like an educated individual. I dont think ill be trusting anything you say.......... Post your fraudulent links if you want to prove your point! ----- :D "reasurch" :D----- LOL! Maybe smoking pot makes you a bad speller;)
Click to expand...

i dont know where scattyD is from, but you need to realize that its not just americans on this forum

and dont go on the prowl looking for trouble you dumb fuck

he was merely stating some facts and you jump on him

maybe someone should think before they type......
 
wArEhOuSePuNk said:
I find this statement extremely insulting / ridiculous. Your trying to tell me (an educated college student) im still 15 yrs. old "mentally". You possess the exact type of attitude that keeps pot illegal. I have an uncle that is a prof. / Archeologist at Yale,thats been smoking since he was in his early teens. He is now 51 yrs.old. Is he 15 mentally??8( :p ^^^^ I dont wanna argue with a mod,but Please post your links that back up these so-called "facts"^^^^^ Who were these studies funded by, the gov.? Do you really trust gov. funded studies?????:| Havent we learned our lessen from the fraudulent ecstasy studies they conducted?
Click to expand...
\


i didnt get ayn of what you said outta the previous statement

and no ones claiming its a steadfast rule


,aybe you should go back to high school, you didnt learn much


and be civil
 
I'm going with the good ol 21 not because i think that kids younger than that can't handle but because IMO to use a controlled substance you must be responsible and on average i do not think most teens have that responsibility level. Furthermore it is a proven fact that when a teenager starts smoking marijuana they are going to meet people who have access to other much more dangerous drugs to the mind and body which i feel could potentially be abused with a much worse effect on the body and mind and also get you in more trouble with the law. Basically I have lost faith in kids these days and feel that drugs at a young age are more than likely going to be abused rather than used and there is a massive difference.
 
zigzag| dta said:
\


i didnt get ayn of what you said outta the previous statement

and no ones claiming its a steadfast rule


,aybe you should go back to high school, you didnt learn much


and be civil
Click to expand...
^^^^^ nice incoherent sentence fragments//\\ ---- Did you even read the whole thread? --- Also,You called me a "dumb fuck",so how am I the one looking 4 trouble?
 
How about we have civil intelligent discussion and stop fuckin bitchin. This is all opinion anyway and like my grandma says opinions are like ass holes we all have them and they smell like shit. this thread smellin kinda shitty guys maybe you could at least give reasoning behind your opinions and stop FLAMIN each other=D
 
zigzag| dta said:
and dont go on the prowl looking for trouble you dumb fuck

he was merely stating some facts and you jump on him
Click to expand...
NOBODY HAS POSTED RELIABLE (OR ANY) DATA PROVING THAT MARIJUANA IS DAMAGING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HUMAN BRAIN. So..........who stated what facts? PLEASE prove your fucking point if you say something is a "fact"
 
Last edited:
wArEhOuSePuNk said:
I find this statement extremely insulting / ridiculous. Your trying to tell me (an educated college student) im still 15 yrs. old "mentally". You possess the exact type of attitude that keeps pot illegal. I have an uncle that is a Professor / Archeologist at Yale,thats been smoking since he was in his early teens. He is now 51 yrs.old. Is he also 15 mentally??8( :p ^^^^Someone please post your links that back up these so-called "facts"^^^^^ Who were these studies that state these facts funded by, the gov.? Do you really trust gov. funded studies?????:| Havent we learned our lessen from the fraudulent ecstasy studies they conducted?
Click to expand...
You're going to have to be more coherent if you expect a response. I didn't understand any of that.
 
That reminds me, forgot to add.. Please stop the personal attacks, keep it civil. If that's too hard to understand, well, I'll consider it more evidence that smoking cannabis on early age is not exactly good for your mental well being..

=D
 
I'm going to go with 18. While I and most of my friends did start smoking pot on a regular basis at an earlier age, looking back on it now I think it would have benefited me to wait until I was prepared to deal with the effects of smoking regularly. I don't regret anything, but I think when I have kids if they want to smoke I'm going to ask them to at least keep it regulated to weekends until they're 18.
 
wArEhOuSePuNk said:
NOBODY HAS POSTED RELIABLE (OR ANY) DATA PROVING THAT MARIJUANA IS DAMAGING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HUMAN BRAIN. So..........who stated what facts? PLEASE prove your fucking point if you say something is a "fact"
Click to expand...


prove yours, by stating that it isnt a fact
 
And? That says something about your bias, not mine. Every article which is on pubmed has that same gov url, you know why? Because pubmed is an online library funded by the government. You can find those same damn articles on sciencedirect and god knows what other sites as well, without the .gov in it.. Your arguments are worthless, you've been presented facts, please support your "theory" by posting something substantial. And no, you're oh so smart uncle isn't proof of anything.

PS: I can see your deleted posts. No, you're not arguing with a 15 year old. Please stop this discussion if all you do is litter the thread with crap.
 
Blowmonkey said:
And? That says something about your bias, not mine. Every article which is on pubmed has that same gov url, you know why? Because pubmed is an online library funded by the government. You can find those same damn articles on sciencedirect and god knows what other sites as well, without the .gov in it.. Your arguments are worthless, you've been presented facts, please support your "theory" by posting something substantial. And no, you're oh so smart uncle isn't proof of anything.

PS: I can see your deleted posts. No, you're not arguing with a 15 year old. Please stop this discussion if all you do is litter the thread with crap.
Click to expand...
Deleted post was not directed towards you(BLOWMONKEY)(youre obviously not 15 physically or mentally). ----- Im not trying to argue. :D thats why I deleted it,you bringing that up seems to be someone looking for an argument:|
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top