• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!

How we rolled in the 90s when the pills were super strong

which as we've learned, could be the result of ingesting a different salt but is just as likely to be caused by other factors.

I am not disputing other factors im just saying to assume always HCL is not correct. Also to assume HCL or any other salt would not make a difference to the high is also not correct. At least that is what I beleive.

you imply that a specific salt equals a specific experience. i've taken two doses of identical mdma powder on different occasions and had completely different - both quantitatively and qualitatively - experiences...

I imply that a specific salt will produce a different experience vs an alternative salt. This could be a range of things as described such as quicker onset, smoother high, slightly trippy, quick come down, lack of hang over. The Mint in my opinion is a prime candidate for an alternative salt type. You only have to visit the mint appreciation thread to experience the 30 minute comeup, short lived intense trip and zero after effects.

i've not seen any evidence to suggest that there are "a lot of alternative salts" out there. define "a lot"?

Fair point badly worded. I rephrase:

There are more alternative salts out there than we realise. Everyone always assumes HCL this is not the case.
 
Despite what everyone is saying im not convinced that the majority of an E trip is about the setting. I still think a lot of it is about the quality of the pill (ie the chemistry) (not just the salt but loads of techniques).

finally on the topic of salts this question is mainly dircted at Scure how easy would it be to take some MDMA HCL crystal basify it and re gas using a different acid?

I am not after instructions as this would be against the rules but say in terms of ease 1 being easy and 10 requiring a lot of chemistry knowledge and skill?? It would be interesting to try it out and finally put the topic to rest.

Any volunteers :D just kidding..
 
^ except it would not put the topic to rest because there are so many other variables.

if you give the same person a dose of mdma hcl from the same batch on two different occasions, they can have qualitatively and quantitatively different experiences.

so you give the same person a dose of mdma hcl then, another time, a different mdma salt and they have a different experience, you've learned absolutely nothing because they can have a different experience when taking the same salt.

how would you explain it if, in your experiment, they ingest two different salts and report the same experience?

one problem with this entire discussion is, in my opinion, that you have already come to a conclusion and you're trying to fit the evidence to it. we're not working on our phds so the bar is set in a different place but your approach is extremely unscientific, for want of a better term.

alasdair
 
Re-basifying it is nothing, but it would take a lot of care, glassware, & materials to actually get to crystals of another salt. And not every salt makes nice white crystals, they each have their own properties. Some salts might not be too bad, while others might not form at all (regardless of skill & care). So there's really no clear way I can answer that for sure :(
 
if you give the same person a dose of mdma hcl from the same batch on two different occasions, they can have qualitatively and quantitatively different experiences.

To a point but if you take pill reports for example some pills generate better reports than others and they are relatively consistent reports. For each user the feelings seem to follow a pattern.

In my eyes a quality pill is a quality pill. Whilst the experience might not be exactly the same from my own personal experience quality pills do produce repeat feelings.

so you give the same person a dose of mdma hcl then, another time, a different mdma salt and they have a different experience, you've learned absolutely nothing because they can have a different experience when taking the same salt.

There is quite a difference between a feeling and an experience.

If I were given two different pills I could clearly define the difference between the pills without being confused by the individual experiences.

how would you explain it if, in your experiment, they ingest two different salts and report the same experience?

Again I would choose the word feeling as opposed to experience but if the onset was the same, the come up felt the same, levels of hallucination 0-10 were the same, come down the same, aftermath the same then conclusion would be that particular salt has zero effect.

Clearly not every come up is the same etc etc but when taking different types of pills I can certainly feel a noticable difference. Taking the same type of pills there is certainly a repeat feeling one gets.

one problem with this entire discussion is, in my opinion, that you have already come to a conclusion and you're trying to fit the evidence to it.

Its not the entire discussion by any means its a small element of it but yes I do beleive the salt type of MDMA has an effect on the perceived high. In my opinion the Mint is an example of this in reality.

we're not working on our phds so the bar is set in a different place but your approach is extremely unscientific, for want of a better term.

Unfortunately not having a lab at my fingertips and que of volunteers then a scientific approach is impossible. However, like with many of the other discussions on Bluelight gatherings of information, constant discussion and endless debates often reap rewards.

Re-basifying it is nothing, but it would take a lot of care, glassware, & materials to actually get to crystals of another salt. And not every salt makes nice white crystals, they each have their own properties. Some salts might not be too bad, while others might not form at all (regardless of skill & care). So there's really no clear way I can answer that for sure

Thanks for this update.

Looking at some of the gassing setups its always looked relatively simple but I guess actually gathering all the solvents etc together is often harder than it looks.

Clearly we wont say anything about solvents and how too etc.

but..

This pic springs to mind where by a Narc is gassing some Base using a Garden Pressure Sprayer. Without going into any synth detail it looks relatively simple.

hcl_gassing_using_plant_sprayer.jpg
 
Gassing with HCl really IS that simple. I meant that the prep necessary to get it ready to be gassed wouldn't be that easy for an amateur, and that acidifying with a different acid won't be as simple as gassing with HCl.
 
"MDMA is not the same as it was"

Perhaps in certain terms but it is what it is.


Even MORE true is the case that your brain is not the same after having ingested a drug (or several drugs) over periods of your life for 20 or more years. If you ate E's in the early or like myself late 90's and you still flirt with it, of course it is not going to be the same. If you ate E only a handful of times in the 90's and a decade later you tried some lab tested beans and had a known/proper dosage of that MDMA, assuming high purity, I bet it would be the same.

When I started partying all the "old school" ravers were saying, guess what? "It is not as good as it used to be" It was fine for me!! I used to roll balls off of stuff they thought was not the same as "the old days".

Now if you have eaten triple digit #'s or even 1000's of E's you can not come out and say with any integrity that it is not the same. Come on. I Doubt there are many people who ate only a couple E's in the 90's then waited 10 years to try something "reputable" and did not have the same effects. If so I would love to hear about it.

You've lost the magic, it is not the chemists losing the ability to synthesize quality "MDMA" Be it whatever routes are available to them. It is just a convenient excuse to escape from the realities of tolerance and over indulgence. To plead that since the synth is different that is why it is not the same.
 
Last edited:
mdma is mdma. I actualyl attribute people saying "its not the same" to the shitty gentically modified unhealthy diet that most americans eat. If you dont have the proper nutrition, the proper brain neurotransmission is hindered and doesnt work the same as someone who eats all organic whole foods. Think about that one........
 
I think its the same shit that was out there in the 1990's its just a lot of BK-MDMA going around and people (those who dont bother testing their gear) assume that its just not as good as what they were getting in the 90's when its that they are not getting the same stuff (pure mdma) as they were back then.., Also a lot of pressed pills in the 90's did have adulterants like speed and even some meth in them so now when people do get mdma (here in the usa) its not the same as they expect there to be that "speediness" too it and its not there now.. GO figure..
 
Yeah a friend whos been raving since the 90s recently came back and tried a MDA + MDMA combo and it said it took him right back to the 90s, Speed + MDMA was also common back then
 
Anybody had that clenchy-less euphoric MDMA? It's still MDMA, but there's definitely two distinct enantiomers, l-MDMA and d-MDMA. Both test as MDMA, and MDMA is usually racemic, but is it always?


I'd be extremely (read: EXTREMELY) surprised if there was ever non-racemic MDMA sold in commercial amounts. A chemist might whip up a batch just for funsies, but no way is someone going to take all that extra time and money for something that Shulgin describes in the following manner:

What was unexpected was that neither isomer gave the magic of the racemic MDMA. It was almost as if both the separate pharmacological components needed to be present to experience the unusual properties of this drug.
http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/shulgin/adsarchive/isomers.htm
 
Omg y u trollin'?!

I'm not, I'm just saying I've had tested MDMA pills that certainly had nothing else, that felt weird. so have a lot of people. clenchy awkward feeling, IDK how to describe it...

Then other MDMA that was probably racemic IMO felt WAYY different than that shit.

Folley said:
I'd be extremely (read: EXTREMELY) surprised if there was ever non-racemic MDMA sold in commercial amounts. A chemist might whip up a batch just for funsies
You never had the clenchy less euphoric stuff? IDK wtf was with that shit. something wasn't right, but it tested perfectly normal.
 
Top