• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: M!$TER-ED

how do people masturbate if they are circumsised?

nolys

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
3,549
Location
I'm asking the fucking questions!
In the title really, sorry might not warrant a thread although I noticed that because I'm not cut my skin rolls over the tip allowing me to tug, how do you do it if there's no skin to roll over?
 
It's far easier and quicker to understand by going to any porn website and watching just about any video. But even after circumcision there is still enough extra skin for stimulation.
 
I don't tend to watch videos of men masturbating, I prefer lesbian porn, namely rimming and anal play. Though as I said I don't watch men masturbate.

So the skin still rolls? It's not a matter of using lube or whatnot?
 
No it has nothing to do with using lub. It's actually pretty much the same way. I wasn't talking about videos of men masturbating, but of men and women having hetero sex, which is the majority of videos. It will usually contain a blowjob and sex, but even with just a blowjob\handjob video you can understand what the dynamic is. But yea, that depends on your preferences.
 
Im circumcised and never used lube in my life.

I use my hand in a wanking motion, repeating until I cum into a tissue. Or over a female, which ever is closest
 
we make due with what's left of the nerves, which were taken from us in the name of god.. genitile mutilation needs to stop and religions need to pay fucking taxes. yeah, god requires you to fix his mistakes.. don't think about how insane that is, have faith and drop some money in the basket on your way out.. the soul you save will be your own8):p
 
Very easily, in fact. I've only had to use lube while on a stimulant binge.
 
I'm fairly tightly cut and I started using lube on my palm at an early age. I think the first time I actually ejaculated was with the help of a handful of my stepmother's facecream.
 
I have to use lube/oil, lotion, or spit. Ideally if masturbating or getting a hand job my precum does the best job. Nothing compares to it for manual stimulation. That requires that I first be really turned on.

Mine is tight when erect. Ideally I'd still have my skin. But its not anything I can change (to my satisfaction) now.

You know, actually, it is not required by Christianity? At least what I've been reading lately says this. That it ended with Christ.

http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/circumcision.html
 
Last edited:
OP look at porn.

question answered lol

(i never thought that would be a legitimate answer to a serious question=D)
 
Depending on a) the accessibility of some lubricant, b) if I feel like taking a shower to remove the uncomfortable greasy residue of the lube afterward, or c) if I have roommates and the slippery and repetitive sounds emanating from my unlit room (like the sound of a very moist slug moving quickly back and forth on a latex surface) may arouse their suspicion or childish curiosity, I forego lube completely and do it dry.

The process is uncomplicated, easy to replicate, commensurate in satisfaction, but also likely to cause chafing and transient dysurea (which I attribute to the pressure of my hand's grip irritating the urethra) . All I do is grip my 80%-100% erect penis about ⅝ths from the base. Then, applying a moderate squeeze, proceed to make the familiar up-then-down jerking maneuver. The difference is that, while dry, I use the aforementioned moderate squeeze to move the skin up toward the glands and back down, with the rougher skin of my hands kept away by using the softer skin of my flute to stimulate the sensitive area above the circumcision scar line. That is to say, I use my hands rougher surface to grip the much smoother surface of my midshaft which I in turn use to stimulate the sensitive surface of my knob end (as a Brit might say).

Make sense?
 
Depending on a) the accessibility of some lubricant, b) if I feel like taking a shower to remove the uncomfortable greasy residue of the lube afterward, or c) if I have roommates and the slippery and repetitive sounds emanating from my unlit room (like the sound of a very moist slug moving quickly back and forth on a latex surface) may arouse their suspicion or childish curiosity, I forego lube completely and do it dry.

The process is uncomplicated, easy to replicate, commensurate in satisfaction, but also likely to cause chafing and transient dysurea (which I attribute to the pressure of my hand's grip irritating the urethra) . All I do is grip my 80%-100% erect penis about ⅝ths from the base. Then, applying a moderate squeeze, proceed to make the familiar up-then-down jerking maneuver. The difference is that, while dry, I use the aforementioned moderate squeeze to move the skin up toward the glands and back down, with the rougher skin of my hands kept away by using the softer skin of my flute to stimulate the sensitive area above the circumcision scar line. That is to say, I use my hands rougher surface to grip the much smoother surface of my midshaft which I in turn use to stimulate the sensitive surface of my knob end (as a Brit might say).

Make sense?

That was quite an in depth response, thank you ever so much for that, everything seems so much clearer now.
Actually no joke good post lol.
I'm Irish, not British.
 
I'm sort of confused as to why you needed to even ask this... You rub it, wet or dry you rub the cock.

I have skin around the tip of no penis, how I manage to play with myself is by gripping hard, and rubbing my foreskin over the nerve endings in my bellend, I don't see how this could happen without this aforementioned foreskin, as it would create an immense amount of friction without it. Imagine trying to rub a metal baseball bat, with 50-75% of your grip strength, would this be easy to rub it fast and hard for a prolonged period of time? The answer is no, no it would not, which led to my question that non de plume has so kindly answered.
 
And I have also came to realise there are those who have some small area of foreskin left and some who don't, who either use their pre cum, or lube to choke the chicken with.
I don't have a mutilated penis, I don't know how this worked.
 
I do dislike derailing threads, but with a somewhat related question as the OP's, I've always wondered if my forced infant circumcision may have diminished my penis' sensitivity.

I do wonder commonly if the quintessential male with an intact foreskin experiences a higher degree of pleasure and sensitivity than the quintessential male without a foreskin. I haven't researched the topic, but I'm curious about the personal observations of males themselves—preferably those circumcised later in life and can still reflect and compare their penis' feeling before and after the circumcision.
 
the only way you would know is by asking adults who were cut as adults. most of whom will say they are happy with it because either they needed it or they cant go back now and change it.

either way as an adult its your choice, as a child you lack consent. no-one would tattoo a child for cosmetic reasons but this cosmetic procedure with its inherent risks is tolerated? hmm people are stupid
 
Top