He's Gone: As Schwagstock founder Jimmy Tebeau enters federal prison...

LogicSoDeveloped

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
3,427
Location
The Mountains
He's Gone: As Schwagstock founder Jimmy Tebeau enters federal prison, should other music-festival organizers worry about on-site drug use?

Anybody who has ever attended Bonnaroo, Lollapalooza, Coachella, Sasquatch or other major summer music festivals understands that drugs are an inescapable part of the experience. Many people enjoy the show sober. Others stick to alcohol. But inevitably there are thousands of people stoned out of their skulls, on every hallucinogen under the sun. It has been that way since the Woodstock era, when "sex, drugs and rock & roll" was a to-do list as much as an ethos.

So on November 1, 2010, when federal agents swarmed Camp Zoe, a 330-acre campground and festival venue in rural Missouri owned by the frontman of a Grateful Dead tribute band, their big announcement after four years of undercover investigation was less than shocking: People at a jam-band festival called Schwagstock were buying, selling and consuming marijuana, mushrooms, LSD, ecstasy and other drugs.


Who knew, right?

The more alarming revelation was that Jimmy Tebeau, the man federal prosecutors aimed to hold responsible for the drug activity, was not actually a drug dealer. He was the venue owner, concert promoter and lead singer of the Schwag, the festival's headlining act. Federal prosecutors contended Schwagstock was "an illegal drug haven, with its music as a side offering."

"We didn't view this as a music-festival prosecution," says Richard Callahan, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri. "We viewed it as somebody who was using a festival site to promote illegal drug sales and profit off of that. We thought there was a difference between a music festival with incidental drug use and a drug festival with incidental music. We believe in this case it was the latter rather than the former."

At first prosecutors weren't sure what charges to press against Tebeau. They used asset-forfeiture proceedings to take his land and freeze his bank accounts (see "Shakedown Street," published in the February 3, 2011, issue of Riverfront Times). Finally, six months after the raid on Tebeau's property, they accused him of "maintaining a drug involved premises" — a violation originally intended to punish landlords who lease houses to crack dealers.

One long-time friend describes Tebeau as "a low-key guy who doesn't like a lot of confrontation," but the 45-year-old with a bushy red beard and long dreadlocks is still indignant about being charged under the so-called Crack House Statute.

"That's not me at all," Tebeau says. "We're talking about a 330-acre campground, and I'm putting on music festivals. I'm paying for the sins of others. Some people were ingesting some drugs at the property and selling drugs, which I wasn't affiliated with in any way, shape or form."

Last June Tebeau reluctantly accepted a plea bargain. Had he gone to trial, he faced the possibility of a nine-year sentence. The government possessed overwhelming evidence that he at least tacitly allowed certain drugs to be bought and sold at Schwagstock (marijuana, hallucinogens and ecstasy were allegedly OK, while crack, meth, heroin and others were off-limits) and profited handsomely from the popularity of his festival as a result. The plea agreement explicitly states that the government could not prove Tebeau himself ever bought or sold drugs.

Prosecutors say the circumstances of the case are unique, but civil-liberties advocates warn that targeting a musician and venue owner sets an ominous precedent for festivals and concert sites nationwide. Tebeau is believed to be the first artist or festival organizer ever imprisoned for widespread drug use at a music festival.

"Club owners should be fearful," says Daniel Abrahamson, director of legal affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, a nonprofit advocacy group working to reform American drug laws. "There is precedent of government overreach with this statute, implicating core First [and Fifth] Amendment concerns."

Abrahamson and others wonder when the government, having targeted Tebeau, will next decide that drug use at a concert has crossed the line from open secret to something that deserves punishment. How does one prove that fans are drawn to a summer festival for the party and not the music? And could the organizers of a mega-festival like Bonnaroo be next?

Tebeau is exactly what you'd expect from a guy fronting a band that promises to "preserve and perpetuate the vibe and music made popular by the Grateful Dead": He is a cheerful old hippie through and through. But his keen business acumen is at odds with the fun-loving-stoner stereotype.

In 1997 Tebeau (pronounced tee-boh) began organizing Schwagstock festivals at campgrounds in rural Missouri. The events were a showcase for his band, the Schwag, and they gained a steady following among Deadheads and Haight-Ashbury revivalists from around the Midwest. The gigs were profitable, but Tebeau wisely recognized that a substantial chunk of his change was lost to the rental fees he paid to the host venues.

On April 8, 2004, the bandleader tapped his savings and borrowed money from family members to purchase Camp Zoe, a sprawling tract of land squarely located in the middle of nowhere: about 80 miles southeast of Fort Leonard Wood near the tiny town of Eminence. Formerly the site of a church youth retreat, the property borders the Ozark National Scenic Riverways near the Current River.

Tebeau envisioned the perfect venue for Schwagstock: beaches, caves, swimming holes and a secluded place to party.

continued at: http://www.riverfronttimes.com/2013-06-13/news/jimmy-tebeau-crack-house-statute-schwagstock/
 
I'm not sure I understand...they say he is responsible for hundreds (thousands?)of people using, buying and selling drugs where he is a member of a band and I guess cause he owns the land. It says that he was ok with certain drugs but not "harder" druga. I mean, I'm sure he didn't print it in ads or get up to the mic and announce it, right? So how can he be responsible for what they were doing...and how would they determine what he was ok with and not ok with...

And if he wasn't selling then how did he profit? Just because people knew that drugs were used at these festivals so they were popular and therefore drew bigger crowds?

I'm not familar with these types of music festivals but have heard plenty people speak of them. Isn't it just kind of assumed that people will be doing drugs at all of them?

Someone who knows about these types of things, please educate me...:\
 
Chilling simply chilling. I really wish je wpuld of fought this in court. I cant imagine a sane jury would of convicted him missouri or not.
 
I don't think this was motivated by drugs at all. I think this was a land grab by the government at the behest of some developer. Supposedly the 330 acres are prime riverfront real estate.
 
Schwagstock is a pretty shit name for a festival IMO. But sounds like a nice place for it, shame he's been busted for what others do there tho, pretty hard to stop using and dealing at large events, don't think promoters here have been held responsible in that way before, but for events and festivals here nowadays you have to pay for a certain amount of police presence and sniffer dogs on top of your security I think
 
Last edited:
Not saying I agree with it but I live in the area and the festival was fucking notorious for drug use/sales. Not to say that other festivals aren't but I'm not surprised that the whole operation was shut down.
 
I really can't believe this, prosecuting someone for absolutely nothing pretty much. People take drugs at every fucking festival and whether or not there is slightly more at this one is pretty irrelevant unless you can prove the people running it are involved in drug sales imho. This guy has been fucked in the ass well and truly.

As someone else said this probably is more about a land grab than drugs, so some super rich asshole/s somewhere can become even more super rich, in reality though that is worse than if this had been motivated by some misguided desire to reduce drug use in that community. Yay capitalism.
 
If they can prove that some developer was trying to grab the land they need to put a bullet in them or at least lock them up for the rest of their days. Pure and simple. Capitalism or not, this sort of shit is absolutely unacceptable. I would do it myself if someone was doing that to me if I had even half a chance.
 
Top