• Welcome Guest

    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
    Fun 💃 Threads Overdosed? Click
    D R U G   C U L T U R E

⭐️ Social ⭐️ Hard drugs now sold 'legally' in Canada

Hope he’ll now try to promote idea of heroin being available for addicts like in Switzerland, UK, NL and some other places rather than idea to sell it openly. Prescription heroin, even provided for free to addicted people would have far better outcome considering individual harm reduction, all kinds of positive results in society as whole and on just about everything beside profits of pushers.
 
Wouldnt it be nice if the drugstore car was like the ice cream car and drove around once a week?

Drugs to the fucking pharmacy! It aint a civilized world till the access to what one feeds the veins with is easy and non-discriminatory.
 
There are already certain cities where you can essentially buy psychedelics openly, Oakland and DC being two examples.
Is DC like it is with weed, its legal but you still gotta gift it to make sure your not selling it? like th way most newly legalized states allow "gifting" of weed with the purchase of another item....
 
I can't believe this is real. This is insane to me.
No it's not insane. Prohibition is insane. Drugs aren't the problem, addiction isn't the problem. The real problem is impurities, a lack of supply, absurd prices and drug-related crime. This "drug truck" or whatever it is doesn't solve the problem, but it's a step in the right direction. Or to say it in the words of William S. Burroughs: "I don't regret taking junk, I only regret the times I live in."
If drugs were legal people could lead completely normal lives, have families, pursue careers, etc. All the problems connected to drug use, especially opioids which are completely harmless to the body, stem from its illegal status.

7l89m4.jpg



7l8a1k.jpg
 
Last edited:
Is DC like it is with weed, its legal but you still gotta gift it to make sure your not selling it? like th way most newly legalized states allow "gifting" of weed with the purchase of another item....
Yes, that's exactly how it goes.
 
I heard he'd got busted after only a day or two in operation?

He got arrested the same day, from what i read there was a cop parked there up the street throughout the day just watching what was happening. Then later on they came in deeper and arrested the dude, i think they were just letting him make more sales to make the case stronger. Hopefully he doesnt get in too much trouble it was a noble act.

Personally i believe all drugs should be legal and tested for purity, it would cut out the cartels and stop countless OD's from drugs tainted with Fentanyl like there are here in North America. Just because there is access doesnt mean you will inevitably go off the rails. Personally i can get some really good designer opioids easily and cheaply but i choose not to cuz my life is more manageable on Bupe and i stay on it.

Sometimes i dabble and get high for awhile on something like O-DSMT "just as good as morphine" and since its pure and i can weigh it precisely im safe as possible. I could be doing this same routine with pure Heroin and live a productive life. Even when i was using Heroin for years daily and it was good clean Dope i still worked everyday and had a productive life.

Not everyone destroys their world, sure i had some bad years earlier in my opioid addiction but as i got older i learned how to manage things much better. Ive got really bad herniated discs and need to be on opioids to function at work, i accept having this lifelong habit. Having access to safe pure heroin would be a blessing, its wonderful antidepressant and is top notch pain killer.
 
if its technically illegal why would they want a passport ?

The whole thing smacks of NWO depopulation agenda imo (both the illegal flood of drugs and the legal proliferation).
100% agenda driven. Welcome to Opium Wars, X.XX

This is one way is one of many ways that you can weaken, control, and herd people, so that they never become opposition. By and large, people cannot accept the idea that there is a war being waged against them. And people are like, "What's with all this division", and "How did it ever get this bad?"

The more things change, the more they stay the same.
 
I can't believe this is real. This is insane to me.
As far as I know this wasn't a serious business, it was more or less a stunt to make a point. But that point needed making; and far from being insane I believe it's the only rational way to handle drugs.

Believe it or not but in my home country of Germany, several members of both the medical profession and law enforcement have seriously proposed the re-legalization of drugs. I'm deliberately saying re-legalization because not much more than a century ago, any 'respectable' person could legally acquire various drugs at pharmacies and this wasn't regarded as some massive problem that was gonna be the end of society as we know it. Heck, the Sears catalogue sold handy little morphine injection kits.

The drug problem is largely a drug policy problem.

Yes there will always be a proportion of addicts, there were addicts back in the day too of course. The difference was there were far less of them (counterintuitive, I know), they weren't generally dying all over the place as they had access to a pure product of predictable potency, they also weren't automatically pushed into the role of social pariah. There's no reason on earth why even a dependent habit should cost you your health and your job and your last shred of dignity, apart from the fact that as a user you're a criminal by default who's paying inflated black market prices, and has to chase after his supply all the livelong day. This leaves neither the opportunity nor the inclination for a regulated life.

The fact remains committed users will get their shit one way or another, and most users (including those of so-called hard drugs) statistically do not become addicts. While individuals with zero interest in drugs are not suddenly going to smoke crack cocaine just because it's legally available. Those with problematic using habits would at least be in much better health and could be helped more readily without all the added legal and social problems.

I don't want coke sold at the nearest kiosk, no. That would be irresponsible. I don't support the 'free market' model for any substance including the currently legal ones (if it was up to me there'd be no advertising for alcohol). I DO however think all going substances ought to be available legally and in as safe a form as possible to those who wish to consume them. (Via specialist licensed drug shops with strict regulations and pharmacy-trained staff.)

For one, the only way to prevent any and all addiction is to curb any and all drug use, and this cannot realistically be done. Even the most draconian measures historically enacted (death penalty for opium smokers for instance) have never achieved this. For another I believe it to be wrong to punish someone for what is essentially a victimless crime. The only person I can directly harm with my drug consumption is myself, and we do not otherwise penalize and criminalize damage to the self.
 
Fellow harm reduction forum members, 11 year member of this website here. Mother. Unaffiliated voter. Probably lightest usage of my life currently right now after 21 years of heavy substance abuse since age 15.

Please tell me what YOU see are the pros AND cons to this?

I can't believe this is real. This is insane to me.
I think it's fucking great wish I had 1 locally. I really hope people are mature while enjoying themselves. Can,t say there's no element of apprehension but hopefully the positives outweigh the negatives. Man...
 
if its technically illegal why would they want a passport ?

The passport thing will end up not mattering. Remember Denver? I was there.

As soon as enough people with some form of passport are going to have accelerated access to dope, they're going to arbitrage it over to a sizeable group of people. Canadian police have about 4% of the resources they need to even look into something like this, and they know it. Everyone watched Denver. Some of us watched it from quite close up, as it happens.

The whole thing smacks of NWO depopulation agenda imo (both the illegal flood of drugs and the legal proliferation).

Unlikely. Remember that the two primary populations of Canada, Innuit and North European transplants, both come from lineages that have histories of shamanistic narcotic drug use. This might not be depopulation so much as people reverting to their nature.
 
Personally i believe all drugs should be legal and tested for purity, it would cut out the cartels

facilitating drug addiction is perpetuating misery. it's really hard to imagine doing that at scale without sociopaths ending up in charge of the program. at that point we may end up asking the question of whether we were better off just leaving this in the hands of cartels.
 
I snort a t shirt but not for years because of how stepped on it is. I don't think I've ever had pure coke in my life.
I had a connection give me a sample to try once, "right off the kilo"...I get back to my room (third story hotel room) and open the bindle...there sits a single,dime sized fish scale looking flake with the oily iridescent sheen..I throw it in the spoon, hit it with a tiny bit of water..it just kinda disappeared..I taste a little drop of the water..it had a very delayed numbing effect..so I slam it..it surely didn't feel like the coke this guy usually sold..I instantly felt like superman..like I had unlimited power..no usual nausea..no usual ringing ears..just power..I got up and was looking out my window at the street 3 floors down and got the idea that I could jump out the window unharmed and stop a moving car..my gf asked if I was ok..I told her that I felt like I could jump out of the window..lol..only then did I get a massive rush that had me just lay back on my bed and close my eyes and it felt like I was just falling through clouds of euphoria..lasted like 10 minutes..amazing shit...
 
is there any other source than vice?
Why is vice bad?

Did you know it was founded by one of the founding leaders of The Proud Boys (senior editor of early vice), but ironically now is known as a leftist publication?

Hmmmmmm

Either way, duckduckgo or google surely will bring other reports.

Why does the factual death of a person need to be from a certain news outlet?
 
Last edited:
I don't care to waste my time on source that I have myself repeatedly observed to straightening the bends or making otherwise shady stuff (like article stating how MDMA will not help your flu and then referencing very few experts who have nothing but speculation and rationalizing but not actual direct touch to topic or study, or the video about datura, which had claims never before or after repeated AFAIK). It has nothing to do with topic but in my eyes Vice is worse than yellow journalism, it does not even smell like journalism. I never read it.
 
Top