Half U.S. ecstasy comes from B.C.

masheadatronic said:
The reason why you think the MDMA you have is good is because of the impurities and the MDMA, really clean MDMA i.e. 90% + pure would not fuck you up (in a normal dose) it would however feel very nice.
Click to expand...

^now this sir, makes ZERO sense.

unless the impurities in his mdma are all psychoactive ingredients(which from what i understand, is NOT the case), then it wouldnt matter much; he'd just need a larger amount for each dose since less of it would actually be MDMA.

so what you're saying is that PURE mdma doesnt fuck you up the same as unwashed MDMA??? i mean maybe pure mdma is a better grab(...'cause you are getting a product of higher purity, meaning less MGs of the powder/crystals is required), but you can't tell me your statement has any truth to it....

if so, let me have it :p
 
ktx49 said:
so what you're saying is that PURE mdma doesnt fuck you up the same as unwashed MDMA???
Click to expand...

Yes. It is a much cleaner high, you can feel the impurities in my opinion in less pure MDMA, it is not just that you need more, the effect is different.

Any MDMA that is 90-95% pure feels VERY clean, you feel as clean as the drug is and the effect is much different to MDMA that is say 70% pure (even if you were to take that little bit extra of the 70% pure stuff.

Trust me I have had MDMA of all different kinds of purities imaginable and I can tell the difference through the feeling very easily.
 
Last edited:
yeah, you'll never want the brown to yellow poorly washed/cut garbage once you've had some really good 98%+ molly. same goes for meth or anything else. it's gross.
 
masheadatronic said:
Yes. It is a much cleaner high, you can feel the impurities in my opinion in less pure MDMA, it is not just that you need more, the effect is different.

Any MDMA that is 90-95% pure feels VERY clean, you feel as clean as the drug is and the effect is much different to MDMA that is say 70% pure (even if you were to take that little bit extra of the 70% pure stuff.

Trust me I have had MDMA of all different kinds of purities imaginable and I can tell the difference through the feeling very easily.
Click to expand...

Sounds like dick-sizing to me (I just do not "trust" that you have that knowledge, but who knows, you may be a chemist.) But that aside, I haven't had a meth-cut pill in a long time and I live in Florida, USA. Here's a list of pills I've had since spring '05 that I believe have had zero-to-little meth in them:

white "1"s (MDA:1)[still clean (no meth) as far as I'm concerned]
blue AT&T (aka "waves")
pink girlscout
yellow mercedes
white lexus
pink heart
pink CK
white euro

That may not seem like many, but thats 8 out of 13 presses I've tried in the last year. And 5 out of those 8 I've tried in the last 8 months. I may just be lucky, but that would mean that the majority of the pills I've tried in the last year (more specifically in the last 8 months) have been clean (as far as I'm concerned.) Therefore I would side with the folks who say that the majority of the US's pills (more specifically Florida) are not made here in the US. I would have to agree that the majority of Europe's pills are clean (due to the fact that there really isn't any meth there, to my knowledge-correct me if I'm wrong.) I would also agree that the meth-cut pills are either pressed here in the US or in Canada and that the MDMA itself is being shipped from outside North America. Whatever, my two cents. Hopefully I'll get some rolls tomorrow.
 
Since when was correcting people known as dick sizing?

lol

If you can't be bothered to do any research or look up the fact that purer MDMA feels a lot different to less pure then don't even bother to bring out a dicksizing comment. Every different batch of any drug will have slight differences depending on so many different variables but one thing for sure is, the purer the drug the cleaner it will feel.
 
^ Unless your'e a chemist, that synthesizes his/her own MDMA, I just dont see how you would know the specific purity of the MDMA you may or may not have used. That is all that I am questioning. Of course purer MDMA will feel different from less pure MDMA, I think that goes without saying.
 
Out of all the MDXX compounds I think the one that is being made the most in the US is MDA (and yes by this I do mean the small scale kilo labs). MDA is cheaper and easier to make than MDMA or MDE and also the precursors are much easier to obtain. There is quite a bit of pure MDA coming out of California.
 
Tylerdurden said:
Yeah, the US blaming it's drug problems on other nations, same old.
Click to expand...

Atleast they mix it up a bit... In 1906 drugs started being controlled because of racism. Atleast they are a little bit more convincing.
 
foxinaboxwithsox said:
Out of all the MDXX compounds I think the one that is being made the most in the US is MDA (and yes by this I do mean the small scale kilo labs). MDA is cheaper and easier to make than MDMA or MDE and also the precursors are much easier to obtain. There is quite a bit of pure MDA coming out of California.
Click to expand...
Elaborate please? The "precursors are easier to obtain..?" huh? In short, the most basic and easy synths all start out the same, if yer making MDA or MDMA, the difference comes closer toward the end and the only real problem would be if you were to tally incapable of obtaining something like methylamine (or a number of other chemicals that all chemically are doing the same thing) ... and yeah, while methylamine is one of those chemicals you just DON'T BUY unless you want an all-expenses paid vacation for the next 10-25 years, there are so many ways to make it the point becoms moot and it isn't really an obsticle at all ... I wont go into so much as the basic componets used but it's all OTC (and by "OTC" I don't mean shit you can get at yer local Wal-Mart, sorry, you can't make any MDxx compound without an order from a chemical supply house - by "OTC" I mean shit you can get from a chemical supplier without having to as much as show ID ... the initial precursors are still the same, be it you go from safrole, piperonal, eugenol, etc... still the most common method used in these small scale American labs is to start with safrole ... I wont get more specific ...

The short end of it is that your aurgument doesn't really work as the precursors one needs to make MDMA are the same as those needed for MDA, it only changes a little toward the end (this is going based on the most common synth's the DEA has found in use in domestic-American lab busts and on the many synths out there and which ones are more complex then others/which require watched chemicals/etc...)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top