IJ - It's not the basic questions that we're taking issue with. They're just funny. It's the answers that are pissing people off. Also the attempts to shutdown any viewpoint that differs from the grand word of Folley (he fought & died for that shit).
Fair enough mate, I'm definitely against shutting down alternate viewpoints [where's Ismene? He can back me up - we had some huge debates over there when I was a mod, and I'm sure I never stopped him from disagreeing with me

]
Some of the rules are mad. I just saw a thread closed because someone posted a Blue Defqon photo & asked for info on it. Why on earth is that not allowed when it would clearly be allowed here?
Funnily enough ED isn't for discussion of specific pills - that should be pillreports. The usual argument is that "no-one can know what is in your pill by looking at" and there's so much regional variation that there's no point and that you should just get a test kit. At least with PR you have people from a particular region looking at the report.
"Other forums have other rules". Why though?
Honest answer? Because no-one's ever been able to muster enough support to impose uniform rules accross BL

. The Aussies all think their rules are correct (and they are even stricter than ED, although ED got stricter over time due to some Aussie mods....in AusDD you're not allowed to talk about how much drugs cost - I got edited for explaining that people did Pipes instead of MDMA in New Zealand, because MDMA was so expensive

). The Lounge gets away with being horrible to newbies and posting total crap because no-one has been able to take it on (and just ban dozens of people). EADD is a fucking fortress that will resist any attempts at external control (that's a compliment

...I don't know if you were here when Catch-22 tried to impose a whole bunch of new rules on this forum? Let's say it didn't work).
Now if I was dictator of BL I'd probably be able to make the rules more similar accross the board, but it's impossible to do that democratically. Every forum would want to stick to its own rules, rather than compromise. So we have a situation where it's one board with some rules in common, and indvidual rules that have evolved in each forum.
Does that sorta make sense?
