swampdragon
Bluelighter
Who suggested that? I would find it hard to censor myself especially when mildly fooked. 8("no-drug-talk Gibberings"
Thats so fucking stupid it spins my brain
Who suggested that? I would find it hard to censor myself especially when mildly fooked. 8("no-drug-talk Gibberings"
Thats so fucking stupid it spins my brain
Well in Other Drugs they have 'no-gibberings drug-talk'. Why not a 'no-drug-talk Gibberings'.
Well in Other Drugs they have 'no-gibberings drug-talk'. Why not a 'no-drug-talk Gibberings'.
I would actually fucking love that.How about simply a No butt hurt gibberings where people aren't allowed to whinge about the weather, the government or embedded video?
Why would you want 10 pages added over night. That's a lot of reading for the moderators n they're gotta check other threads too.
If people don't want 'triggering' discussion they could start a 'no drug talk thread'.
It'd be a pretty slow moving one though.
I think BL gives huge amounts of what I would class as personal and privacy freedom, much more so than FB.
Wouldnt be so sure of that. Huge amounts i seriously doubt. This place is probably high priority for being monitored, after all its one of the biggest drug forums. it would make sense for it to be monitored. spying agencys, or whatever, blatantly would properly look into us easier than we realize. Facebook apparently logs everything but i dont give much of a shit.
That would fuck me over. I wouldn't be able to do sarcasm anymore.How about a no-duality-of-meaning gibberings, where everything that's written is written at face value and has no underlying message or any ambiguity in how it can be received. What do people think?