Itsgoneundertheboa
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2015
- Messages
- 807
Possibly your both right? Because their is no answer. I don't count mr Community Justice / wolfsangel or whatever he may call himself today; your writing style looks very familiar sure Shambles already spotted it ?.
Countries / lines whatever you want to call them are created by those in power who wish to ring fence what it is theirs governed by force.
The only barriers that actually truly exist are those of a geographical nature. We have been brainwashed to fictional barriers and notion of cultures by our own leaders, the ones that wish to maintain those barriers and borders to protect their resource.
Immigration is simply movement of people to a place where the resource can substantiate the growth. If the first place were perfect no need for immigration.
The planet simply can not sustain the growth rate in the area of low resource; as pointed out birth rates are much higher in those areas as the likely hood of successful longevity of life is much lower.
So either you allow genocide or you allow immigration. Which one?
Radicalism and immigration two very different topics. They can't be discussed as one because the factors are very different. Perhaps to point out that the animal who starts this debate is a UK citizen born and bought up for a substantial part of their life in the U.K.
Countries / lines whatever you want to call them are created by those in power who wish to ring fence what it is theirs governed by force.
The only barriers that actually truly exist are those of a geographical nature. We have been brainwashed to fictional barriers and notion of cultures by our own leaders, the ones that wish to maintain those barriers and borders to protect their resource.
Immigration is simply movement of people to a place where the resource can substantiate the growth. If the first place were perfect no need for immigration.
The planet simply can not sustain the growth rate in the area of low resource; as pointed out birth rates are much higher in those areas as the likely hood of successful longevity of life is much lower.
So either you allow genocide or you allow immigration. Which one?
Radicalism and immigration two very different topics. They can't be discussed as one because the factors are very different. Perhaps to point out that the animal who starts this debate is a UK citizen born and bought up for a substantial part of their life in the U.K.