Yo guys
After trawling BL for a while now, I've decided that once summer's over and I'm back on the gain-train once again, I'm going to do my next bulker blast properly. By properly I mean working out exactly which compounds are going to work best for my goals, their respective dosages and running time, and ultimately sourcing them (NOT THE POINT OF THIS THREAD).
This has led me back to GH (growth hormone - somatropin). Over the last couple of weeks I've touched on reading up about peptides, particularly GHRP-2/6. Now I understand utilising peptides over directly injecting the hormone itself has its benefits, such as not messing with the pituitary's closed-loop feedback for GH pulses (correct me if I'm wrong there - haven't read any papers, just forum posts/random webpages). If correct, such things will effectively make peptides more valuable than GH itself. Anyway, to the point of the thread:
*******Please do not mistake the following for price discussion. No prices or sources are to be named, whether they be legal or otherwise*******
Assuming the cost for either of these compounds will be uniform across their sources (ie source A, B, C etc all sell their compounds at exactly normal market rate), which route is the best bang for buck so to speak? By this I mean dollar-for-dollar which compound will be the most effective - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, or just straight HGH? Dosage is irrelevant, since we're talking in terms of cost here. If you need to use X-amount of GH to achieve a certain result, but Y-amount of GHRP-2 to achieve the same result, which one was the cheaper option?
Yes, I realise I wall-of-text'd a really simple question; I just wanted to make sure it was clear what I'm asking while also ensuring it's clear I'm not discussing actual market prices.
Thanks all
After trawling BL for a while now, I've decided that once summer's over and I'm back on the gain-train once again, I'm going to do my next bulker blast properly. By properly I mean working out exactly which compounds are going to work best for my goals, their respective dosages and running time, and ultimately sourcing them (NOT THE POINT OF THIS THREAD).
This has led me back to GH (growth hormone - somatropin). Over the last couple of weeks I've touched on reading up about peptides, particularly GHRP-2/6. Now I understand utilising peptides over directly injecting the hormone itself has its benefits, such as not messing with the pituitary's closed-loop feedback for GH pulses (correct me if I'm wrong there - haven't read any papers, just forum posts/random webpages). If correct, such things will effectively make peptides more valuable than GH itself. Anyway, to the point of the thread:
*******Please do not mistake the following for price discussion. No prices or sources are to be named, whether they be legal or otherwise*******
Assuming the cost for either of these compounds will be uniform across their sources (ie source A, B, C etc all sell their compounds at exactly normal market rate), which route is the best bang for buck so to speak? By this I mean dollar-for-dollar which compound will be the most effective - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, or just straight HGH? Dosage is irrelevant, since we're talking in terms of cost here. If you need to use X-amount of GH to achieve a certain result, but Y-amount of GHRP-2 to achieve the same result, which one was the cheaper option?
Yes, I realise I wall-of-text'd a really simple question; I just wanted to make sure it was clear what I'm asking while also ensuring it's clear I'm not discussing actual market prices.
Thanks all
