• REAGENT TESTING & DRUG CHECKING Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Featured Link 1 Featured Link 2
  • RT&DC Moderators: Senior Staff

.G/Lady vs. G./Lady

has anyone noticed microscopic blue specks on them, with a beveled edge? you can't even see the blue unless your really eying them up in the light? the woman only shows one leg, and they're 'crumbly'.
 
That was a newer batch of the originals I believe. The first ones (G. , .G , and sunflowers) were bright white, no colored specks. The more recent ones (with the single leg) have had the blue specks. As the original G. ladies have now been tested on ecstasydata.org to contain only MDA (not a MDMA/MDA mix as everyone had originally thought), these are probably the same.
 
^^
hypothetically....

if someone were to have the 'new batch (beveled edge, single leg, microscopic blue specks)' which probably only contains mda, would you advise them to suck up the loss (if you define mda as a loss) or try and trade them with someone for different ones?
 
MDA is my favorite of all of Shulgin's chemicals, so perhaps my advice would be a little partial... Sorry for that. Either way, there is no such "sucking up the loss" in this case as many people actually prefer MDA.
 
i've had lots of different G's... the 'triple stacked' .G's, the flatter G.'s, and the blue speckled ones too. i know the white G.'s are supposed to be highMDMA/lowMDA, but the ones i've had lately (new york area) have been extremely trippy, way more than the original .G fatties were. i dont have a tester, but i know what MDA feels like, and im almost positive these new G.'s are cut with a research chemical...2c-x?
 
I doubt a 2C-"X" chemical. If one has experienced any of the 2C's, it's obvious there effects are way different than MDMA (different from comparing MDMA to MDA for example). Just a good dose of MDA in my opinion--- what would make you 'almost positive' these new ones are cut with an RC?
 
About a month ago I had ladies, I think they were G. also but not exactly sure, that came up positive for speed and a 2c-x substance using marquis. Never ended up trying them and just got my money back.
 
funboy87 said:
i've had lots of different G's... the 'triple stacked' .G's, the flatter G.'s, and the blue speckled ones too. i know the white G.'s are supposed to be highMDMA/lowMDA, but the ones i've had lately (new york area) have been extremely trippy, way more than the original .G fatties were. i dont have a tester, but i know what MDA feels like, and im almost positive these new G.'s are cut with a research chemical...2c-x?
Click to expand...

I recently picked up three of the blue speckled ones, are they legit?
 
the blue speckled ones are legit (mdma/mda Medium-ish?) not as strong as the white ones tho.

and OBVIOUSLY i have tried research chemicals and i obviously know that they feel nothing like MDMA, or MDA, which is why it was obvious to me that these pills were cut with something else. i tripped harder off one new G. than 3 or 4 of the old .G's many months ago, and it felt totally different. one thing i noticed was the intense psychedelic feelings were on and off throughout a 12 hour peroid. i would feel relatively normal, then a minute later i would be trippin again. very wierd, i've read reports of .G's containing 2c-i (which ive done 3 times). cant say if it is that or something else, but definately not MDA.
 
Well, once again, all I can say is that the original G. ladies have been tested to only contain MDA. All the others are the same in my opinion. Send one of those "2C-x" pills to ecstasydata.org if you are so sure they are different. Until I see those results, I call bullshit on this idea. Most people would buy 2C-s as what they are--no need to "trick" people into buying them. You are still posting MDMA/MDA combo (even if you are referring to a different batch/color) which has already been proven incorrect as well through the testing (the submitter also suspected a combo pill with the G.). These pills are MDA!

http://www.ecstasydata.org/viewtablet.php?ID=1593

Don't understand why you all are trying to soil this pill's good, clean name with research chemical "propoganda"; but I don't agree at all...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=5658
^
These people (in the link above) are talking the same RC bull that you are--at least they have their iffy test results to fall on (though a green color could indicate speed as well). Not really an issue in your case though---you have no proof. Show pics of the test results if you have them...

http://www.pillreports.com/index.php...y_pill&id=5656
http://www.pillreports.com/index.php...y_pill&id=6586

These two are the exact same press, just thick and tall instead of fat and flat (like the first one above)-- all from the same maker--2 of the 3 you have specified tested positive for MDxx, the other one is suspected MDxx. They tested on ecstasydata as MDA. Until you have legitimate proof otherwise...MOD EDIT: No personal attacks. ~RB

Also...this one you mentioned-- (http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=5656)
Read the comments on this report. Everyone is actually discrediting the whole 2C-x theory.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thexmancometh said:
http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=5658
^
These people (in the link above) are talking the same RC bull that you are--at least they have their iffy test results to fall on (though a green color could indicate speed as well). Not really an issue in your case though---you have no proof. Show pics of the test results if you have them...
Click to expand...

Actually, the user in this report used a Marquis reagent, which shows orange for speed/amp, not green. I think you have your reagents mixed up.

We could argue and argue until we are blue in the face over the 2Cx possibility - but EcstasyData has this pill already tested at MDA and MDA only. http://www.ecstasydata.org/viewtablet.php?ID=1593

Of course there could be other batches, but what is the reality of someone using a 2Cx compound in a pill? It would cost more $$ than the typical fillers, binders, ect. In my opinion, people are getting a very high dose of MDA and they are not used to it, therefore they feel "trippy". MDA in high doses can be extremely trippy, and with the quality of pills these days very few people get to experience a damn good pill.

Just my .02. :)
 
OK- i did not come on this website to fight with people, and i thought i knew something about g spots since xxx. sorry to xman for callin u an idiot. i hope you people are careful about the pills u take, even if you think u know what they are...
 
Last edited:
Did a quick search... I was misinformed--my apologies. The actual substance I was thinking of was:

A.5 Dimethoxy-meth HCl CHCl3 107 Moderate olive (reaction)

(A.5 stands for the Marquis Reagent)

Source: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183258.pdf

Wouldn't this actually be DMMDA? If so, it has been described as similar to LSD, maybe this is something to be looked into...
 
EcstasyData has this pill already tested at MDA and MDA only.
Click to expand...

man, i hate correcting a mod but this pill contains mda AND mdma, although the .G is mainly an mda pill, it has a noticeable amount of mdma as well. Im not saying this because of simply how it felt, but i have never seen any indication of the pill not being a combo.

However, any 2c-x presence is very unlikely, although i know that now we have other pills with the same .G or G. press, some are blue and they are on pillreports, and those specifically are probably about half as strong. It's possible that one/a few of the knock-offs have something like 2c-i, but i still think its unlikely... yet not impossible.
 
FractalStructure said:
man, i hate correcting a mod but this pill contains mda AND mdma, although the .G is mainly an mda pill, it has a noticeable amount of mdma as well. Im not saying this because of simply how it felt, but i have never seen any indication of the pill not being a combo.

However, any 2c-x presence is very unlikely, although i know that now we have other pills with the same .G or G. press, some are blue and they are on pillreports, and those specifically are probably about half as strong. It's possible that one/a few of the knock-offs have something like 2c-i, but i still think its unlikely... yet not impossible.
Click to expand...

You're not really 'correcting' me, you're trying to correct eData, who uses a GC/MS to test these pills. You're going to argue with GC/MS results? 8(

I stated before that we can argue this point until we're blue in the face. I am sure there are different batches and everything but arguing with a GC/MS test is pretty pointless. :|
 
Check out my post Northeast region, I have pics of a new batch of these going around NY area. It is a very well made knockoff that you should not buy. Hope this helps someone out there.
 
all i know is, these pills rocked me *MOD EDIT: No event names, please. ~RB*
good shit!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top