• ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️



    Film & Television

    Welcome Guest


    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
    Forum Rules Film Chit-Chat
    Recently Watched Best Documentaries
    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • Film & TV Moderators: ghostfreak

Film: War of the Worlds (2005)

rate this

  • [img]http://i1.bluelight.nu/pi/16.gif[/img]

    Votes: 8 16.7%
  • [img]http://i1.bluelight.nu/pi/16.gif[/img][img]http://i1.bluelight.nu/pi/16.gif[/img]

    Votes: 9 18.8%
  • [img]http://i1.bluelight.nu/pi/16.gif[/img][img]http://i1.bluelight.nu/pi/16.gif[/img][img]http://i1

    Votes: 17 35.4%
  • [img]http://i1.bluelight.nu/pi/16.gif[/img][img]http://i1.bluelight.nu/pi/16.gif[/img][img]http://i1

    Votes: 14 29.2%

  • Total voters
    48
/rant #2

Atlas, I'm with you!

War of the Worlds is a flashy but tedious movie which feels cobbled together out of scraps from the space invaders junkpile from which it liberally steals.
It’s got the unwashed working classes (as if Spielberg would recognize them if they ran up and polished his limo) meandering for their imperiled lives, it’s got devious, long-term plans for the hostile takeover of America and The Whole World, and it’s got rude, ugly creatures who seek to annihilate and consume everybody who isn’t on their team.

Any CNN report about the Bush or Howard administrations will give you a bigger scare.

This isn’t to say that War of the Worlds is a terrible movie. It’s not. There’s loads of energetic CG Sturm und Drang and
some shallow family drama which may seem adequately “meaningful” to summer audiences -- though there’s more depth
in Married: With Children. (Also, however Spielberg backpedals now, it felt much more honest in Close Encounters
when Roy Neary abandoned his family to take up with the galactic rubberheads. Just as it felt honest when Indiana Jones
used his cowardly gun to kill the elegant Arab swordsman. In movies, gut-responses play true!) I could almost let this
thing squeak past without panning it, but it’s a matter of perspective.

If this movie had been created with a modest budget and released with any degree of subtlety, it would be, simply, a very redundant but adequately engaging sci-fi
action romp.

But since it’s being pushed as The Movie To See (and no offense to Paramount or Dreamworks – they both release some fine movies), expectations going in are forced up much higher. And those expectations simply are not met.

So let me make fun of it a little, via dialogue which should be in the movie, but, alas, isn’t. First the humans:

“Hey, let’s drive our stolen minivan through that enormous throng of desperate pedestrians – that sure won’t cause us any hardship!”

“Y’know, since those multiple, unstoppable, fast-approaching death machines are mercilessly attacking us, let’s all climb aboard this extremely vulnerable ferryboat – they’ll never catch us then!”

“Gee, let’s all scuffle about behind this 48-inch tall antique mirror – then that persistent, evil, well-lighted camera-sensor- tentacle thingy certainly won’t notice us!”

(Come on, screenwriters. Come on, Writers Guild. Please.)

And now for the Martians (or whatever they are – basically an uninspired cross between the ID4 aliens and the CG
Gollum):

“Gosh, it sure was smart of us millions of years ago to plant one of our giant death machine thingies directly under what would become a popular intersection in contemporary New Jersey!”

“Goodness, how’s about we just leave most of rural Connecticut alone – I mean, it’s not like there are any humans there
or anything!”

“Wow, we sure are scientifically advanced and everything – but just for kicks, let’s go roam that bluish planet sans
spacesuits and see what happens to us!”

Egad. See, the problem with this War of the Worlds is that under the slightest scrutiny it collapses into nonsense!!

One minute they’re frying people to ashes with laser beams, another they’re simply killing them (we don’t
know how, but this gives us a quiet and effectively eerie scene at a river), the next they’re drinking their blood through big flexi-straws, and then suddenly they’ve got ‘em in big mesh cages – presumably en route to a big Martian wok? One can sense Spielberg straining to ramp up the tension with multiple kills and louder effects and Big Metaphors, but he’s
repeatedly undone by the silliness and inconsistency of the writing. Starship Troopers – also a very flawed sci-fi
adaptation – is a better alien onslaught movie: Meaner, smarter, more disturbing.

Since this year is the thirtieth anniversary of Jaws – a near-perfect thriller which holds up beautifully three decades later – it’s worth taking a minute to ask: What’s up with blockbusters nowadays?

Surely someone with Spielberg’s power would at least recognize the importance of elegance and character-development and enchanting storytelling over bluster and blam-blam – if not, whenever possible, struggling to implement these qualities of a Great Movie.

But like many Hollywood stews with way too many cooks, War of the Worlds adds up mostly to a big kettle of tepid overkill.

One rubber shark, Steven – that’s all it took before. One rubber shark.


/rant #2
 
Well I saw it last night and I agree with all those who said it was very tense.

For me it was tense. My chest was tighter watching this movie than any movie I can remember. It wasn't necessarily horror or terror, more of like a "holy fucking shit" feeling that I had.

I gave it a 3. I wouldn't buy it, but if you're into these kinds of movies, I can see how you defintely would enjoy it. The special effects were great, the storyline was weak, but over a 3
 
atlas said:

Science fiction is supposed to be believable, either by virtue of common sense, or some kind of in situ justification. The idea of spacemen jaunting over from Mars, trying to kill us, and failing on account of these things we've discovered with microscopes was believable several hundred years ago... it just isn't today.



no, science fiction is based on what you're willing to let go
as far as what you know.... yes, you and i know that, were
WE to travel somewhere, we'd try and find out if we could
inhabit the world... and where spacesuits as a j.i.c....

they had been here before... long before we were here,
presumeably... and it was our interaction with the environment
that created the germs that weren't there when the aliens
were here before... that was the whole point... when the
narrative said something to the fact that we had "earned"
the right to survive... because the germs had mutated from
older germs and we had mutated with them ...

now, some people can take it there with what they're willing
to invest in a science fiction movie... others cannot... but THAT
is what science fiction is based on... not being believable,
necessarily...


besides, change THAT part of the story, and people would
have bitched and bitched and ranted and raved about that:

"man! Speilberg sucks for changing the ending! i wanted
the germs to kill them bitches...!!!"

can't win for losing.


atlas said:

And fuck Morgan Freeman for grabbing the largest, dullest hammer in reach, writing obvious on it with a black marker, and swinging it into my head at the beginning and end of the story.


why fuck Freeman for something he didn't write?

he just showed up, got paid, and broke camp.

can't be a hater on that.

Chaos Butterfly said:

I have vague recollections of the TV series when I was younger, and I used to have nightmares about it. It was some seriously scary stuff :)

i don't recall it being a tv series...

a book...
then a radio broadcast...
then a movie...
but not a tv show...

are you talking about V, maybe ;)
 
loved the effects but tom cruise just leaves me cold. i like to feel some sort of empathy with movie characters but i didnt care about anyone in this film. only time i came close to liking tom cruise was in magnolia but he still sucked
 
Awesome. I was slightly disappointed that I didn't get to see more of the machines destroying things and obliterating human life on a massive scale, cuz I really like the machines destroying things. I also thought the alien machine drivers were too dumb, like when they were looking at pictures of people and fumbling all around. That just didn't say "advanced alien race" to me enough. But god damn I put myself in the reality of that movie and I was scared. Can't I give it 3.5 stars?

If you're one of the people that "hate" this movie, you must be a Tom Cruise hater, cuz there is no other reason to hate.
 
Yeah I didn't like cruise nor his character throughout watching this film, but that didn't take away my understanding that they are simply trying to survive. It's this basic plot which sold it for me.

I liked the little girl's comment (albeit an overly clever one for her age) about the splinter in her hand, and how her body will reject it on it's own. It subtley gives away the ending of the film.
 
Pretty good movie. I really enjoyed the human nature in survival situation theme -- Tom Cruise v. the mechanic, Tom Cruise v. Tim Robbins, scarcity and the mob attacking the car. My usual complaint with Spielberg is overuse of cliches, and here it is the same. Could have done with much much less of Dakota Fanning's shrill screams, much less of the lingering close ups on the actors' eyes. Not that I didn't enjoy his character, but I couldn't help but laugh when Tim Robbins showed up. He just had that crazy look in his eye. It does look like a bit of Kubrick rubbed off on Spielberg. There were a couple of cool shots where the lighting and the feel almost seemed like Eyes Wide Shut.
 
lee harvey said:


If you're one of the people that "hate" this movie, you must be a Tom Cruise hater, cuz there is no other reason to hate.

Thats not true. I actually like Tom Cruise a lot!
 
***SPOILERS***

This movie had me laughing like crazy...some observations:

-Tom Cruise and his kids take the solar powered minivan on over to his ex-wife's house, right? Then they go down to the basement when a damn PLANE crashes into the house. Well luckily they were okay, but the house and everything around it was tore up from the floor up. EXCEPT that minivan, which was sitting right where he parked it, not a dent in the fender. Man I guess Ford doesn't fuck around any more.

-Tim Robbins living underground with that hood over his head damn near the whole time. When he was introduced we busted out laughing, he looked like a crazy Obi-Wan. I swear they should've given him a light saber instead of a shotgun. "Not my blood!!!! NOT MY BLOOD!!!"

-At the end, the military doesn't notice birds on the alien machines, but Tom Cruise does. "LOOK AT THE BIRDS!!!! LOOK AT THE BIRDS!!!!" "Well damn Tom Cruise, we supposed to be some hard mufuckas at the top of our game, protecting y'all civilian asses from unstoppable evil that's the size of a skyscraper, but damn if we even noticed that those birds broke through the force shield and are sitting up on the evil alien death machines that are trying to kill us all RIGHT NOW. Thanks my brotha, Collin Powell ain't have shit on you!!!!"

-Worse wrap up to a movie EVER. They really thought thirty seconds tagged onto the end could do it? This was like ending the Usual Suspects about ten minutes early, and just cutting it off right in the middle of a scene and then having a voice over go: "Okay suckas so Verbal Kent was that guy alright, he stuck everybody good fashion, THE END."

Overall the laughably bad parts of this movie made me not feel cheated out of my ten dollars.
 
Soundtrack said:
***SPOILERS***

This movie had me laughing like crazy...some observations:

-Tom Cruise and his kids take the solar powered minivan on over to his ex-wife's house, right? Then they go down to the basement when a damn PLANE crashes into the house. Well luckily they were okay, but the house and everything around it was tore up from the floor up. EXCEPT that minivan, which was sitting right where he parked it, not a dent in the fender. Man I guess Ford doesn't fuck around any more.

LOL!!


you're so right on that!!!


damn!
 
Left to Right said:
Call me a pussy, but I did feel a little uncomfortable watching it. I wasn't pissing my pants scared, but I really got caught up in the tension.

Yeh I felt that too - there was something uneasy about the whole movie, I was trying to put my finger on it. Some of the acting wasnt the greatest in places, but I think of lot of the tension had to do with the fact that you never really liked the character to begin with - you were put off in the beginning and werent on "stable footing" for what was about to happen as it were. Its very different from the usualy science fiction farce.

3/4


Alltogether a good move, I still rate Batman begins over "War" any day!
 
I was impressed by the special effects but very dissapointed with the ending. Really stupid IMO. The acting was weak in some parts but overall kept my interest.

-weez
 
physix said:
i don't recall it being a tv series...

a book...
then a radio broadcast...
then a movie...
but not a tv show...

are you talking about V, maybe ;)

It was a TV show or maybe a miniseries, but definately on TV. More recent than V I think.
 
SPOILER ALERT









Ok, the stuff that pissed me off about this movie:

Wouldn't the aliens themselves, over time, develop immunity to what ails us? They've basically already crippled the humans, can't they just come back again and again and again? I'm sure there are plenty of them.

What was so special bout the area of Boston where the kids mom was at, that it didn't get blasted by the tripods? It was untouched!! IT'S BOSTON!!! I don't get that.

Also, how did the kid magically survive the battlefield? He had disappeared, then moments after, this fireball of an alien thing comes at Tom Cruise, and it all looks to be just destroyed. I don't get it. The whole family coming together thing to me was ridiculous.

The van thing was also ridiculous.

I did think it was incredibly intense in the theater, and totally worth seeing.

I have never seen an ending so wrapped up, though. 8(
 
Top