Seriously? Your applauding prohibition?
In any case, the scientific community is going to be in a huge uproar over this as there is legitimate research going into these compounds
Tobacco companies like to spray their stuff with new addictive chemicals all the time that nobody really knows whats going on. Also, there is reports about the firesafe cigarettes being more toxic than ever before. yay.
I'm sure whoever the hell is making these blends shouldn't have access trouble.
I actually own a tax paying distribution company and recently had to switch designer drugs... and like you said it wasn't hard.
Banning 5 chemicals out of 4000 = .125% success rate in banning synthetic designer drugs...
Nice job feds...
(Why hasn't there been action against chemicals like 4-MMC yet... and other nasties... To go after the RC's first is something to laugh at!)
SOoooooooooooooooooooooooo... Are we all forgetting that little thing called the Federal Analog Act? Yes there are 1000s of ANALOGS to the banned ones. But if you have an analog of a schedule I substance, you get prosecuted just as you would any other schedule I substance.
Yes, everyone is just giddy about the few 'noids listed. Might the chems chosen be deliberately selected because they cover the major cannabinoid molecular-geometries -- thus allowing capturing all the others as analogs?SOoooooooooooooooooooooooo... Are we all forgetting that little thing called the Federal Analog Act? Yes there are 1000s of ANALOGS to the banned ones. But if you have an analog of a schedule I substance, you get prosecuted just as you would any other schedule I substance.
Don't see why so many of you are hating on this shit. Its a substitute for those who don't have the freedom to smoke the real thing.