psood0nym
Bluelighter
This article is part of an ongoing investigative journalism piece drawing from a number of different sources, including studies, recent meetings of organizations involved with pain management and policy, etc. There is no one source for this article. Also, there is no "stupid journalist" who wrote it. There are two journalists in the byline. Regarding the comments asking what we're going to prescribe for cancer patients, the article states:
"In an email, Nelson said he also supported the idea of a label change that would block the prescribing of opioids for chronic, non-cancer pain."
No offense to anyone in particular, but I don't think many people actually read the article before getting angry, scared that their opiates are going to be taken away, over generalizing the content of the article, and finally logging in to vent about what are arguably tangential topics. This is my first time ever reading internet comments ... is this usually how things go?
"In an email, Nelson said he also supported the idea of a label change that would block the prescribing of opioids for chronic, non-cancer pain."
No offense to anyone in particular, but I don't think many people actually read the article before getting angry, scared that their opiates are going to be taken away, over generalizing the content of the article, and finally logging in to vent about what are arguably tangential topics. This is my first time ever reading internet comments ... is this usually how things go?
Last edited:


