Family issues warning after teen suffers severe brain damage from synthetic marijuana

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Family issues warning after teen suffers severe brain damage from synthetic marijuana

HOUSTON -- On December 7th Emily Bauer began to slur her speech, stumble, complain of massive migraine headaches and began to turn violent, psychotic, and too difficult for her frightened family to control.

Her family called for an ambulance to take her to the nearest hospital. But within 24 hours she was being life-flighted from a Cypress-area hospital to the Texas Medical Center, the victim of a massive series of strokes.

She suffered severe brain damage. She was only 16 years old. And the culprit was synthetic marijuana.

“She actually had swelling on her brain that they had to drill into her head to relieve the pressure,” said her father Tommy Bryant.

“They didn’t even know if she’d make it through that procedure. But they had to do it.”

Emily has turned 17 since she has been hospitalized at Children’s Memorial Hermann. But doctors warned her family it could be her last birthday.

Doctors discovered that Emily’s brain damage was extensive. She was disconnected from life support. Plans were being made to donate her organs if she died.

A month later Emily is still alive but she can’t walk, she can’t feed herself, and she is blind.

Recently she began to recognize her parents and is able to have limited conversations. But Bryant and his wife have been given no assurances how much of their daughter will ever come back.

“It’s hard,” Bryant told us of the now month-long ordeal. “It literally, the way we’re looking at it now, is we’re gonna re-raise a child. I don’t wish this upon anybody, anybody at all,” he said.

Bryant has since discovered that his daughter and her friends were experimenting with synthetic marijuana brands like Kush and Spice that the teens purchased over the counter at a convenience store near her home.

Multiple injuries and deaths across the United States have been linked to the products sold as incense or potpourri in small packets and marked with the disclaimer “not for human consumption.”

Lawmakers and municipalities have been struggling for years to outlaw the products and their ingredients.

“Some of the chemicals that we’re reading online that are in these things, I mean I wouldn’t put on my grass,” said Bryant.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse says about 11 percent of high school seniors reported using synthetic marijuana, according to a 2011 survey.

And calls about synthetic marijuana to the American Association of Poison Control Centers more than doubled between 2010 and 2011.

Bryant and his family, with their daughter still in the hospital and hoping she can be transferred soon to a physical rehabilitation facility,

have started their own Facebook page dedicated to Emily’s story and the dangers of synthetic marijuana. It’s called S.A.F.E. – Synthetics Awareness for Emily.

“If we reach one more kid, a family that doesn’t have to go through this, that doesn’t have to spend hours upon hours, nights upon nights in a hospital not knowing what their kid is going to get back,

then I feel like we’ve accomplished one small thing,” he said.

Emily’s family and friends will also hold a fundraiser and benefit for Emily Saturday January 19th at Mezzanine Lounge, 2200 Southwest Freeway in Houston to help pay for her rising medical expenses.

with video -

http://www.kmov.com/news/health/186340462.html
 
sad. really sad. ill go ahead and say it, assuming synthteic cannabinoids were to blame, had she had the real thing i wouldnt be writing this. in frederick MD about 2hrs from where i live they recently busted a guy with what the city paper described as a barrel of MDPV and 2 big bags of white powders identified as jwh (forget the numbers, it was the 2 most popular ones tho) and a ton of some kind of tea like substance that they used to make the spice stuff.

there are so many in the series of synth cannabinoids you never know what you could be possibly ingesting.
 
that is a sad story; as much as i hate drug criminilization or anything related to it, i think gas stations and shit should stop selling this stuff. We don't know enough about it to be selling it, especially to minors and things like this are bound to happen to someone. Given that milllions of people use synthetics without issues, maybe it just had something to do with her genetics/biology or whatever. Either way, synth noids should only be used by researchers and those who know the risks, not teenagers who recklessly get high on whatever they can find.
 
sad. really sad. ill go ahead and say it, assuming synthteic cannabinoids were to blame, had she had the real thing i wouldnt be writing this.

Cerebellar Infarction in Adolescent Males Associated With Acute Marijuana Use
Stroke Associated with Marijuana Abuse
Stroke with neuropsychiatric sequelae after cannabis use in a man
Cannabis Use, Ischemic Stroke, and Multifocal Intracranial Vasoconstriction

The Scientific literature: It disagrees.

I'm sad to hear anyone has been injured, particularly when partaking in what seems like harmless fun. I agree that synthetic cannabinoids should be studied further, and people aware of the risks. But people should be aware of the risks of drugs in general, including the supposedly harmless ones.
 
^given that cannabis has been used for thousands of years i think we need more evidence than that to conclude that regular old cannabis is harmful. Really, this should have been researched intensely in the last few decades but due to the illegality of cannabis it hasn't, so there's still more to figure out. We could have had 40-50 year long studies on the effects of cannabis by now.
 
^given that cannabis has been used for thousands of years i think we need more evidence than that to conclude that regular old cannabis is harmful. Really, this should have been researched intensely in the last few decades but due to the illegality of cannabis it hasn't, so there's still more to figure out. We could have had 40-50 year long studies on the effects of cannabis by now.

Being used for thousands of years does not make something safe. Mercury(ii)Sulfide has been used as a cosmetic for 1000 of years. Arsenical bronze has been used for food utensils for 1000 of years, tobacco has been used for 1000 of years. Etc, Etc. Particularly since a) The issue at hand is fairly rare. b) I'm not really convinced that people who believed in demons causing disease and lived in rock houses would of been able to figure it out, with their lack of MRI, CT, pharmacology theory and with the mathematics for the statistical aspects of epidemiology not, well, being invented yet. In any event, I don't think it's intellectually honest to handwave away a fairly large body of scientific evidence presented by many sources of a long period of time on the basis of "Lol ancient people did it!" Is that even your rational for dismissing it? Or is appeal to consequences? If P then Q. I like Q. Therefore P. In this specific case. "If this is not true, then Cannabis has no evidence of being harmful. I like cannabis. Therefore, this is not true.
 
yes i know but given the long history of use without issue, it does say something. People haven't been consuming mercury sulfide safely for a thousand years, so i wouldn't take it based on that. My point is that in those thousands of years no one has died and no society has collapsed because of cannabis use. That's not my rationale for dismissing it. I'm too high for logic right now but i think you can grasp my point. If there were tons of studies that were reproduced showing a definite link to cannabis and having a stroke, i'd be a bit more concerned than i am.
 
Hasnt there been alot of deaths from the use of synthetic cannabis and it has been around for how long? And deaths directly from cannabis? Supposedly none, not sure if this is true though, and cannabis has been used for how long?
 
yes i know but given the long history of use without issue, it does say something. People haven't been consuming mercury sulfide safely for a thousand years, so i wouldn't take it based on that. My point is that in those thousands of years no one has died and no society has collapsed because of cannabis use. That's not my rationale for dismissing it. I'm too high for logic right now but i think you can grasp my point. If there were tons of studies that were reproduced showing a definite link to cannabis and having a stroke, i'd be a bit more concerned than i am.

There are a lot of studies if you go looking. You don't KNOW how many people died of strokes from cannabis in the 1000s of years past. Neuropathology and toxicology where not exactly developed disciplines 2000 years ago in the Thai jungle. The death is not particularly dramatic or distinct to the extent that an illiterate goat herder would be able to tell it apart for any other seemingly natural/random death.

Hasnt there been alot of deaths from the use of synthetic cannabis and it has been around for how long? And deaths directly from cannabis? Supposedly none, not sure if this is true though, and cannabis has been used for how long?

Death from THC toxicity as such is not the cause of death and won't be listed as such. Kind of like how when a smoker dies of lung cancer it's not listed as "nicotine toxicity", or death from kidney failure in a type II diabetic is not listed as "Sugar toxicity". The papers are pretty clear, and there is consensus.
 
Just came across this site that is 'DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THOSE WHO DIED AS VICTIMS OF SYNTHETIC MARIJUANA'... Some of these people died whilst under the influence doing dangerous stuff, but some died directly from the use of the drug(s).

http://tothemaximusblog.org/?page_id=560

Since this substance hasn't been around even 10 years yet, it seems very unsafe to me compared to cannabis, but that's just my view, I wouldn't touch it if I was paid, but I enjoy cannabis every now and then.

According to the Psychonaut Web Mapping Research Project, synthetic cannabis products, sold under the brand name Spice, first appeared in Europe in 2004.[10] The brand "Spice" was released in 2004 by the now-dormant company The Psyche Deli in London, UK. In 2006 the brand gained popularity. According to the Financial Times, the assets of The Psyche Deli rose from £65,000 in 2006 to £899,000 in 2007.[11] The EMCDDA reported in 2009 that 'Spice' products were identified in 21 of the 30 participating countries. Because 'Spice' was the dominant brand until 2009, the competing brands that started to appear from 2008 on were also dubbed 'Spice'. Spice can, therefore, refer to both the brand 'Spice', as to all herbal blends with synthetic cannabinoids added.

No official studies have been conducted on its effects on humans.[33] Though its effects are not well-documented, extremely large doses may cause negative effects that are in general not noted in cannabis users, such as increased agitation and vomiting.[34] Professor John W. Huffman, who first synthesised many of the cannabinoids used in synthetic cannabis, is quoted as saying, "People who use it are idiots."[33] "You don't know what it's going to do to you."[35] A user who consumed 3 g of Spice Gold every day for several months showed withdrawal symptoms, similar to those associated with withdrawing from the use of narcotics. Doctors treating the user also noted that his use of the product showed signs associated with addiction.[36] One case has been reported wherein a user, who had previously suffered from cannabis-induced recurrent psychotic episodes, suffered reactivation of his symptoms after using Spice. Psychiatrists treating him have suggested that the lack of an antipsychotic chemical, similar to cannabidiol found in natural cannabis, may make synthetic cannabis more likely to induce psychosis than natural cannabis.[37]
Studies are currently available which suggest an association between synthetic cannabinoids and psychosis. Physicians should be aware that the use of synthetic cannabinoids can be associated with psychosis and investigate possible use of synthetic cannabinoids in patients with inexplicable psychotic symptoms.[38] Also, people with risk factors for psychosis should be counseled against using synthetic cannabinoids.[39]
Myocardial infarction (heart attacks) were associated with the use of the synthetic cannabinoid K2.[40] Also, convulsions were associated with the use of a synthetic cannabinoid product.[41]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_cannabis#History

sad. really sad. ill go ahead and say it, assuming synthteic cannabinoids were to blame, had she had the real thing i wouldnt be writing this.

I tend to agree with this quote.
 
Of course, that these products may be (probably are) risky does not imply cannabis has no risks/that it does not cause strokes. VX gas and plutonium dust are vastly more toxic than synthetic cannabis is, does that mean synthetic cannabis is therefore safe?
 
Of course there are risks with cannabis too, I used to green out as a kid and spew and stuff. Drinking too much water can be harmful and even deadly as well.

To me fake pot just seems really risky. It is a psychoactive designer drug derived of natural herbs sprayed with synthetic chemicals that hasn't been around for even 10 years yet and we are seeing alot of deaths and issues with users, and with cannabis it is a plant that has been used for along time (with not nearly as many documented cases of harm on humans) -

Evidence of the inhalation of cannabis smoke can be found in the 3rd millennium BCE, as indicated by charred cannabis seeds found in a ritual brazier at an ancient burial site in present day Romania.[6] In 2003, a leather basket filled with cannabis leaf fragments and seeds was found next to a 2,500- to 2,800-year-old mummified shaman in the northwestern Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China.[116][117] Cannabis is also known to have been used by the ancient Hindus of India and Nepal thousands of years ago. The herb was called ganjika in Sanskrit (गांजा/গাঁজা ganja in modern Indo-Aryan languages).[118][119] The ancient drug soma, mentioned in the Vedas, was sometimes associated with cannabis.[120]
Research has failed to show that cannabis increases risk of death.[17][18] In particular, it has never led to overdose death.[19][20][21] According to a 2006 United Kingdom government report, using cannabis is much less dangerous than tobacco, prescription drugs, and alcohol in social harms, physical harm, and addiction.[22][23] According to former US DEA chief administrative law judge Judge Francis Young:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_(drug)#Safety

Of course people can do and use what they like, but it just seems a very risky kind of high to me compared to cannabis.
 
Of course, that these products may be (probably are) risky does not imply cannabis has no risks/that it does not cause strokes. VX gas and plutonium dust are vastly more toxic than synthetic cannabis is, does that mean synthetic cannabis is therefore safe?

i get your point about the history of use being irrelevant especially compared to scientific data. I'll have to look into the stroke thing some more, it's not something i've ever heard of before this.
 
^given that cannabis has been used for thousands of years i think we need more evidence than that to conclude that regular old cannabis is harmful. Really, this should have been researched intensely in the last few decades but due to the illegality of cannabis it hasn't, so there's still more to figure out. We could have had 40-50 year long studies on the effects of cannabis by now.

Any drug is bad when abused or if the stuff is tainted with other chemicals. The fact is, marijuana is alot less harmful than portrayed in the media and all the drug scare tactics.
 
Are you scared yet?

Pure propaganda. Lots of bullshit here. If they can make public the mechanism by which the synthetic weed caused the stroke I would believe it. Moreover, if they knew the mechanism they would most certainly make it public.

This article is just spouting out some BS to scare lay people and cause a knee jerk reaction. So the girl and her friends were experimenting with synthetic marijuana. That means that more than just her ingested the same substance. Why didn't all her friends also stroke out? Why aren't all the other people who ingest these substances having strokes? Why aren't there any direct quotations about synthetic weed causing her strokes from the doctors who treated her?

How in the hell do the authors of the article draw the conclusion that the synthetic marijuana is what caused her stroke? Sometimes young people have strokes, it is certainly less common than with elderly people, but it does happen due to various natural causes. Normally a stroke is caused by either a blood clot (many potential causes) or an aneurysm (with such a young patient usually some form of trauma or vessel structure abnormality).

From her symptomatic it sounds like a typical aneurysm with bleeding in the subarachnoid portion of the brain (CT would verify this pretty accurately). If the bleeding is not stopped fast enough local oxygen deprivation follows, which then leads to tissue destruction, which then leads to an increase in overall pressure within the skull leading to the necessity of a trepanation. Sadly, time is brain, and they didn't quite hit the deadline.

Could the synthetic marijuana have exacerbated an already present problem? Sure, why not, but there is no evidence that even this happened. There is no doubt that synthetic marijuana abuse (like any abuse) is unhealthy, and could lead to potential health problems (for instance lung problems and/or specific neurotransmitter imbalances is what first comes to mind). However, I would not include brain or other types of aneurysms among these unless evidence can be provided showing otherwise.

So as a friendly message from our lovely, objective media... remember kids, don't take synthetic marijuana because it makes your brain bleed...
 
Last edited:

I don't think I agree with what you are saying, exactly, though I do agree that it is important to point out the risks of cannabis, as many people tend to downplay the risks.
But as far as whether the literature disagrees, I wonder if you are giving undue weight to a few poorly done studies.
I would argue that the ones you cited don't show much, if anything at all, about whether there is a link between cannabis and stroke.
The first study includes only 3 subjects.
The second study, just one.
The third study, just one as well.
Total of the first 3 studies: 5 subjects.
These are case studies, which show little about relative risk or cause and effect.

The fourth study you cited found signs of cannabis use in 13 of 48 stroke patients.
All of them were also tobacco users.
Their conclusion is worded very weakly (Multifocal angiopathy associated with cannabis consumption could be an important cause of ischemic stroke in young people)

Anything that raises blood pressure could "cause" a stroke, even if it is not the "ultimate cause".

But is the incidence of stroke or aneurysms in the cannabis-using population comparable to that the skydiving population, for example、or people who have sex, or work out, or those who drink coffee - all of which raise the risk of aneurysms in at least some people (coffee is one of the most commonly noted risks)?
None of those studies can even attempt to answer that question.
If you or anyone else has links to studies that do answer this question, please share them.
Until I see a study that does, I will remain agnostic to the question of whether cannabis use can lead to / cause aneurysm or stroke.
 
Their conclusion is worded very weakly (Multifocal angiopathy associated with cannabis consumption could be an important cause of ischemic stroke in young people)

They worded it that way to avoid saying something untrue.

Look, I agree that cannabis is a largely benign drug when considered against other drugs, but the fact is that it impacts cerebral blood flow significantly and this logically could lead to stroke in a few infrequent cases.
 
Top