extraordinary pharmacology

[Adrenochrome]

Even if you're not trolling, and this technique is true, its not for people who are not in a very defined field of pharmacology/biology/chemistry, let alone hobby druggists

You're obviously not a person who is in those fields, moreover, you're obviously not a career-sciencetist; so let me use my arnold schwarzenegger impression and ask you, "WHO IS UR DADY AND WHAT DOES HE DO?"

 

[Refluxer]

What's wrong with you ppl?

 

[LuxEtVeritas]

let's consider this closed without a Mod dong so as one may not be around to do so but obviously the thread has both reached its limit of valid discourse and of acceptable antagonistic nature

EOD here, OK guys...for respect for the site

Thx

 

[spectrasonic]

The research was performed at the rockefeller research institute, a quite prestigious research institution. It was probably funded by the NIH.

the thread is a waste of bandwidth, the idea has no scientific backing, evidence or proof, and is merely a dressed up bastard of millions of man hours spent on SAR. It's not that I disagree with it, but what evidence is there to support it that has been published in peer-reviewed journals? (your previous link did not work) To me it is more of a crack-pot opinion/dream of a person trying to catch attention and be famous without actually doing any real science. Unfortunately these people are ubiquitous anymore.

So looking at this thread, spect. has initiated every personal attack, cursed at my lack of manners, and now is calling me a bloke? (sorry, doesn't offend us yanks.) You sure have a lot vested in this person's opinion.

Maybe you don't know what a troll is, but you are being one. I'm done with this.

So is this argument based on some sort of transatlantic schism, seeing as you consider the Rockefeller prestigious, but the work done at the UCL here in the UK somehow inferior?
How can a new idea possibly have scientific backing, evidence, or proof? How can any sort of conceptual innovation occur which would satisfy these demands of yours?
Oh, and bloke is not an insult, Sorry.

 

[spectrasonic]

Even if you're not trolling, and this technique is true, its not for people who are not in a very defined field of pharmacology/biology/chemistry, let alone hobby druggists

You're obviously not a person who is in those fields, moreover, you're obviously not a career-sciencetist; so let me use my arnold schwarzenegger impression and ask you, "WHO IS UR DADY AND WHAT DOES HE DO?"

You're right, I'm not a "career-sciencetist"
Who is my dady?
I don't know, maybe he's with my mumy?