ecstasy vs meth

[GrOwThSpUrT]

MDMA gives me horrible comedowns, the happy feeling and energy feel way too forced to me, it makes people sound, and often look, like complete idiots.

Meth is bad for you, it's addictive, but the high is much better. Not when you take it day after day after day, but when you just take one dose or maybe a second one if it doesn't seem to be enough an hour after taking the first one. You'll be fine the entire evening/night and the comedown is nowhere near as crappy as the MDMA comedown.

The people that look like crap because of meth are the ones that use it to stay up for days at a time, and ofcourse you're gonna feel like fucking shit when you've been up and on drugs for that long. Try staying awake for a week on MDMA and tell me how the comedown feels.

Meth owns MDMA any time. I have only used meth about 10-20 times in my life in the past 3 years. I did MDMA quite a bit more than that. Meth rules, just don't get any large quantities of it, don't redose after already having been up all night. Just don't be a (r)etard and you'll be just fine. Just don't use it too often(I'm talking a few times a year max here)

 

[Rated E]

MDMA has given me a new perspective on certain issues and my life. I believe I'm actually a happier person for taking it (except in those rare periods of abuse). Its helped me connect with my friends in a way which may not have been possible without it, and i've developed socially aswel. Plus its fun as all hell :D .

I haven't done meth, but i doubt i could ever get as much from it, as i have with e.

 

[Vivid]

meth is cheaper, has a "better" administration methodology, and um, doesnt burn as big of holes in brain-tube

Remember the ads with those picture of the holes in the brain said to have been caused by ecstasy? The scientist who did that study later retracted his findings because he later found that he gave the subjects methamphetamine instead of mdma due to a "labeling error".

 

[RaverRack]

Remember the ads with those picture of the holes in the brain said to have been caused by ecstasy? The scientist who did that study later retracted his findings because he later found that he gave the subjects methamphetamine instead of mdma due to a "labeling error".

also they were not HOLES IN THE BRAIN simply areas that registered lower in that particular indicater.

 

[indelibleface]

And, of course, E doesn't drain your spinal fluid, but I think that guy was joking.

 

[Rated E]

^^ No, but it releases serotonin, i think thats why idiots get it confused with 'releasing spinal fluid'.

 

[Rated E]

Oh and yea, you know who was a meth head? Thats right, HITLER!!!

 

[Submarine]

Ecstasy is far better for the world and for interpersonal relationships. I know that it certainly helped me come out of my social shell and open up to other people. I believe that no drug is inherently bad, but methamphetamine is just abused by too many people. Meth fits the American society very well by maximizing productivity and minimizing down time; very materialistic and ego-inflating.

 

[Sprinklervibes]

A productive methhead? Hmm

 

[Rated E]

^^ Hitler was a productive meth head.....

 

[Sprinklervibes]

He was "productive" before he started shooting meth. A lazy bum won't turn into someone productive when he starts shooting meth.

 

[Spectum]

ecstasy is the way. There is far less addiction risk.
On meth I simply don't care about others' feelings or emotions. Methamphetamine takes out the beast in me. No way.

 

[shn()z]

also they were not HOLES IN THE BRAIN simply areas that registered lower in that particular indicater.

Yeah, but "HOLES IN THE BRAIN" is so much sexier and more lurid. Talk about lowered indicators or serotonin levels and people's eyes glaze over. How are you going to scare Mr. & Mrs. Middle America and boost ratings with scientific mumbo-jumbo? HOLES IN THE BRAIN! Everyone, no matter how dull-witted, can picture a brain with HOLES in it... and know right away it's something you don't want to have!

 

[bowdenta]

A productive methhead? Hmm

I have never met a nonproductive methhead. no matter if they are cleaning their house, organizing their cds or counting the haird on their leg, they are always doing something

oh and I know people that make mad loot making sales 12 hours a day

 

[swifty]

for me the two go hand in hand, its like a meat pie and sauce, so I can't really compare them, where there's one, there's usually th other and I enjoy them both for the different high they produce.

 

[Entity of 1]

haven't tried meth. don't want to. honestly, i think it's just as bad as crack or heroin, and those are too bad for me personally. I like x a lot tho, and I don't think that any other temptation will make me stop liking it. in truth, x does much better things to your body and brain than meth, and does less damage, so that's what i would suggest and encourage for anyone in a dilemma for favorites.

 

[cucarot]

fuck meth....get your roll on people..

 

[eRollin]

Remember the ads with those picture of the holes in the brain said to have been caused by ecstasy? The scientist who did that study later retracted his findings because he later found that he gave the subjects methamphetamine instead of mdma due to a "labeling error".

you saw the special ecstasy on the rise report too?

 

[RavenousBlonde]

then dont get pills get molly... put it in a capsule and take it..... molly is alot less hit and miss

Make sure what you've got is actually "molly", and not substance "xyz" crushed up and put into a cap. It takes zero effort to crush up something, place in a cap, and pass it off as "molly". Testing kits don't lie.

The holes in the brain and draining your spinal fluid stuff is utter bs. But, most of you already know that.

 

[eRollin]

Make sure what you've got is actually "molly", and not substance "xyz" crushed up and put into a cap. It takes zero effort to crush up something, place in a cap, and pass it off as "molly". Testing kits don't lie.

The holes in the brain and draining your spinal fluid stuff is utter bs. But, most of you already know that.

thats what i was thinking. if someone can gather adulterant ingrediants, color them, press them and sell them as something its not wouldnt it be just as easy to just crush up adulterants and sell them?