CretiNation said:Well basically because whenever I've heard of anyone ODing from illegal drugs they always go after whoever supplied the drugs and try to get them for murder. Obviously it makes no sense at all but that's what I've read. Have you found that this isn't the case? Cause if so I guess we just read different news articles.
My guess that he got the pills is yeah, obviously baseless, but you know. He was 26, she was 18. He probably got the hotel room for a good time that night so is it really that absurd to assume he also bought the drugs? Maybe, but if my girlfriend died from ecstasy I had gotten there's no way in hell I would say that I was the one that got it, would you?
As a female who is the younger one in my relationship, and who has rented alot of hotel rooms and bought alot of "supplies" for parties, I would say why the hell do you assume that just because shes the younger chick she didnt do any of th planning or organizing.
people always think that the girl aint the one buyin the shit or doing any of the settin up of a situation, like somehow, girls dont know how to buy drugs or rent a hotel room or what the hell ever. girls are just as capable of wantin a night out and makin that happen as guys are.
Theres a 50/50 chance that the guy got the pills and a 50/50 chance it was the girl. Just becuz he said he didnt buy them, that dont affect the odds of who it was in any way. He could be telling the truth for all you know. He could A. Have bought the pills, and said he didnt. or B. Not bought the pills, and said he didnt. Theres a equal chance of both, with nothin pointin towards one side or the other.
That is why i said your post is complete speculation. there is no evidence at all or anything to imply that the guy bought the pills, other than "He said he didnt." Is denying guilt a sign of guilt? do you think that is a good piece of evidence to back up your theory?
Not tryna be a dick, just attempting to show you why your theory is unstable.