• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

EADD seeks hot new mod action [THREAD SHOT ITS LOAD]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I had BHM, along with about 10 other people, on ignore for a while, when theye were telling me things i didnt want to hear at the time of my phenazpam train wreck. They've all be un-ignored one by one. Most people stayed out of that one, but out of those that did get involved some were supportive, some were deliberately trolling, others were just stating opinions and facts.
 
EDIT - not drinking sparkly wine

Marmz, Alb is a big boy, he knows I <3 him dearly, and knows I'm only giving him a big ole rib poking about the whole cowardice thing. I think you're being a little overly sensitive here.
Possibly, and this answer is loads more preferable and more accurate than your previous one.

Who's your guess for the Mod who's already been chosen?

I'm praying it's Shamanthambles.

I recon Colt Dan should be given a chance if theyre taking on more too.

too many time zones
Well that's a real shame because I think you were probably a frontrunner ;p

post more in EADD, kthnx <3

See Aronson and Mills (1959) and Gerard and Mathewson (1966).

You cunt. <3

Festinger and colleagues (1950) proposed the theory of group cohesiveness that suggests that cohesiveness can be considered as attractiveness to individuals within the group and attractiveness to the group as a whole.[7] Lott and Lott argue that interpersonal attraction within the group is sufficient to account for group cohesion.[8] In other words, group cohesion exists when its members have mutual positive feelings towards one another.

Cool, so I was right about the erotic dreams then. But just didn't credit you with being pervy enough to dream about them in a group-sex kinda way *

Whatever, I'm fucking impressed regardless, knock ;p

Tell me more about your dreams please ....




* Might give that one a ponder myself one day ;p
 
If theres a couple of positions going I'll use this account for one and my alt for another... I can play good cop, bad cop then all by myself...... ;)
 
Haha =D

Yeah seriously we're still debating but we felt a few more mods would bring better coverage when I'm off being a student and one of us occasionally gets stuck in a drug circle. So yeah I think a few more apps are still needed. Even if you're not sure, but think it might work out, do it. It's more of a learning as you go process bar the Official BL handbook you get when you join and guidance from current mods along the way.
 
Possibly, and this answer is loads more preferable and more accurate than your previous one.

Who's your guess for the Mod who's already been chosen?

I'm praying it's Shamanthambles.

I recon Colt Dan should be given a chance if theyre taking on more too.
[/SIZE]

Was going to make an alt account called "ShamanThambles" and apply for a giggle, sadly life is too short.

I think Shambles has been there/done that modwise and posting periods are becoming more sporadic. ColtDan has the perfect credentials IMO; he is unemployed and spends all day and night taking different drugs while posting here. Problem is I'm currently in his bad books and can see him being quick to release the infract trigger on my ass.

Personally I think 3 mods do the job. 2 could even do it, maybe. If you post something that 3/4 mods wouldn't snip, wouldn't warn, wouldn't close etc... with 4 mods it's always going to get penalised. More mods means less lenience altogether; tighter controlling; restriction. 5 mods is just silly.
 
We're looking at it as having greater coverage so someone is (almost) always here to sort things out. People are not going to get penalised just because we get more mods; we do discuss action to be taken between the three of us as it is and that won't change. A lot goes on behind the scenes to ensure everything is fairr as it can be and if an infraction is given that's unfair it can always be reversed if it's seen to be as such. We do disagree sometimes and a few new perspectives will help, IMO.

So don't worry about that, we try not to restrict things too much here and as I said before a lot of discussion goes into how to deal with stuff. We're not going to go all fascist just because we have a few more people :D
 
Was going to make an alt account called "ShamanThambles" and apply for a giggle, sadly life is too short.

I think Shambles has been there/done that modwise and posting periods are becoming more sporadic. ColtDan has the perfect credentials IMO; he is unemployed and spends all day and night taking different drugs while posting here. Problem is I'm currently in his bad books and can see him being quick to release the infract trigger on my ass.

Personally I think 3 mods do the job. 2 could even do it, maybe. If you post something that 3/4 mods wouldn't snip, wouldn't warn, wouldn't close etc... with 4 mods it's always going to get penalised. More mods means less lenience altogether; tighter controlling; restriction. 5 mods is just silly.
Colt Dan has said he's not into censoring personal stuff/beefs (there's wastebasket all that can be dumped in anyway if it's a choice between censoring and not), so unless you're going to be advising people to start slamming meth, I think you'd probably be left alone ;p


And perhaps there's more to the recruitment story than the mods are letting on. Ever think of that one ;)
 
Ooh, tasty conspiracy theory? :D

If I give a ;), will that mean something I don't intend it to?
 
Im all for freedom of speech and threads going off topic, it keeps the threads alive. apart from breaking the rules of no source mentioning, no racism or slating people that have died on here, etc. infractions are pretty pointless from what ive gathered. the only modding i see that needs doing on here is the said source mentioning and perhaps foolsgold and brimz spamming links all over the place. although i do the same now and again

Haha, raas i'd just be abusive to you if you pissed me off, much like i do now. which wouldnt be good for the atmosphere as seeing an abusive mod isnt a good example to set, lead by example

anyways cheers for the little vote of confidence marmz and bb <3 love ya, you lovely peoples, i aint gonna apply though, much better people for the job on here than me plus i cant really be assed x
 
Yeah MDB, where's yer intel from, huh ... huh?

No backing down now either ... giz a hint Mr Coulson, who's yer source?

I have my moles. No, no one has leaked anything, i just misunderstood someones PM about the mod position on The Darkside. It seems that has been decided, i thought they were talking about EADD, but they weren't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top