Drug dominoes begin to topple

LogicSoDeveloped

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
3,427
Location
The Mountains
As more and more U.S. states move toward marijuana legalization, the Obama Administration needs to take a stand

Call it the Marijuana domino effect.

Less than two weeks after Washington and Colorado voted to legalize and regulate cannabis, lawmakers in five other states say they are considering similar bills.

In Latin American, Mexican President Felipe Calderon says Uncle Sam now has lost the “moral authority” to ask other nations to maintain the cannabis prohibition and combat trafficking.

A fundamental change has occurred, he added, that requires the rethinking of public policy in the entire Western Hemisphere.

Calderon joined the leaders of Belize, Honduras and Costa Rica on Monday calling for the Organization of American States to study the change, and saying the U.N. General Assembly should hold a special session on the prohibition of drugs by 2015.

What didn’t seem remotely possible a fortnight ago suddenly seems inevitable.

Lawmakers in Rhode Island and Maine said they intend to introduce marijuana legalization bills for debate next year, politicians in Vermont and Massachusetts indicated they will, too, and Ohio may join them.

Since even homegrown smuggled from Colorado and Washington would be far cheaper than B.C. Bud or Mexican schwag, with the exception of a few border states, the Sinaloa cartel could soon lose up to half its total income from American cannabis consumers.

A Mexican think-tank says the two states may do more damage to the country’s bloodthirsty narcoterrorists than the war on drugs came close to achieving.

Meanwhile, in Washington, D.C., the Obama Administration is flummoxed by the sea change in the public mood towards marijuana and the expensive, failed attempt to control it with criminal laws.

Few would have predicted the pot prohibition could fall almost overnight like the Iron Curtain, nevertheless the two-state triumph for has set off a series of tremors that suggest the people’s will has shifted.

America appears to have reached a tipping point in terms of attitudes toward cannabis and, if the weight of public opinion truly has passed the fulcrum, change could be rapid.

Legalization campaigns are no longer smoky affairs financed by dime bags peddled by Cheech-and-Chong aficionados and Big Lebowski-Dude wannabes.

They’re well-funded, well-organized and cross partisan lines: In swing state Colorado, pot outpolled President Barack Obama.

The stoned and the sober agree the prohibition is an abject failure: It’s easier for kids to get weed than alcohol or tobacco.

Those in B.C. pushing for change have taken notice and embarked on a similarly professional campaign that addresses middle-class concerns instead of staging smoke-ins.

Legalization promises tax revenue for governments and an above board alternative lifestyle for those with a gift for growing or retailing the herb.

Washington State thinks there’s a half-billion a year in tax revenue waiting to be harvested and everyone understands the black market must be dismantled.

Legalization will mean kids aren’t saddled with lifelong criminal records, our communities will be rid of illegal grow-operations and gangs will lose a key profit centre.

It is estimated the U.S. could save $7.7 billion by legalizing pot and generate another $6 billion by taxing it at the same rate as alcohol and tobacco

How the states propose to regulate and tax larger scale production and distribution is the billion-dollar question.

Colorado has until July 1 and Washington until the end of next year to issue a statewide regulatory plan, and both say they plan to meet the deadlines.

President Obama may be willing to go with flow.

The U.S. federal government so far has refused to denounce — or accept — what has happened, even after the state governors asked this week for clarification.

Obama faces 18 states that have legalized medical marijuana with a spectrum of regulatory models that range from supplying anyone with so much as a broken heart, to meting it out to only the seriously debilitated and dying.

As a candidate in 2008, and again as president in 2009, Obama promised restraint when it came to enforcing federal laws against med-pot.

His record is questionable — he has been tough on states with liberal access and less aggressive with those maintaining more rigorous regimes.

Regardless, many of his donors and advisers urge him to use his second term as a chance to pursue authentic drug-policy reform.

He could watch as more and more states vote on legalization, or he could lead.

Regardless, the dominoes have begun to topple: and Canada will follow.

source: http://www.vancouversun.com/Mulgrew+Drug+dominoes+begin+topple/7555366/story.html#ixzz2CQkC89FU
 
Wonder how long it's going to be until this reform reaches the rest of the world, and how long it'll be afterwards until we see reform for other drugs. I want heroin maintenance already!
 
It is incredible how fast this has all happened. I thought I spent too much time on Reddit to believe people were becoming more liberal about weed but seems like it's actually happening.

Any UK BL's will know of the Ecstasy trials where they have MDMA to people live on TV in a trial to see what happens and whilst it was not a brilliant advertisement for it, it seems as though we are heading in the right direction.
 
^ We're not heading in the right direction.. the government are banning chemicals left right and centre..

We need to blow up The Sun and Daily Fail offices.
 
They are banning all the RC's that come on to the market but surely exposure of MDMA and other drugs is a good point? As in, that is the best we can hope for right now without blowing up the Daily Fail.
 
Sorry to be gloomy, but the WA and CO laws might still be struck down by the Supreme Court once challenged. It already struck down similar laws in the past under the Commerce Clause which says that the Fed has the right to regulate drug laws within its borders. You can bet there are already people (like big pharma and the DEA) working around the clock to make a case against it. If the U.S. loses face then the global drug laws begin to change so they're going to try and stop it. Besides, based on the story coming out of Ecuador about the drug money, there is way more private money to be made by the U.S. government by keeping narcotics illegal.

The domino effect will only begin if WA and CO's laws survive the coming months.
 
"And ohio may join them"

O happy fucking day! I have been waiting to hear something like that. Fuckk yeah fuckk yeahh

Looks like marijuana legalization is the craziest thing that's going to happen in 2012. Its not the end of the world its the beggining of a brand new start!
 
Sorry to be gloomy, but the WA and CO laws might still be struck down by the Supreme Court once challenged. It already struck down similar laws in the past under the Commerce Clause which says that the Fed has the right to regulate drug laws within its borders. You can bet there are already people (like big pharma and the DEA) working around the clock to make a case against it. If the U.S. loses face then the global drug laws begin to change so they're going to try and stop it. Besides, based on the story coming out of Ecuador about the drug money, there is way more private money to be made by the U.S. government by keeping narcotics illegal.

The domino effect will only begin if WA and CO's laws survive the coming months.

Maybe, maybe not, if the US Supreme Court strikes down the new laws in WA and CO, I wouldn't be surprised if some countries (especially in South America) are so pissed off at the base hypocrisy that they just go ahead and adjust their drug policy anyway. Honestly, I think the ball is roll on this one, it's just a question of whether the US wants to lead the pack or drag it's feet.
 
"And ohio may join them"

O happy fucking day! I have been waiting to hear something like that. Fuckk yeah fuckk yeahh

Looks like marijuana legalization is the craziest thing that's going to happen in 2012. Its not the end of the world its the beggining of a brand new start!

I have been of the strong belief since reading Mckenna's work on the i-ching that this is a monumental year for this reason. What is bigger than stopping all the death, corruption, greed, incarceration and fear? The end of drug illegality could truly make this world a better place for MANY reasons. The cannabis market alone could cure the world hunger problem. Cocaine regulation and taxation could easily take care of all domestic health care and heroin regulation and taxation could take care of the rest! The blip on the radar for 2012 is this! and I have thought that since I was 13. I am so happy to see this happening in the year 2012, though I would be much happier to have been born into a world that works from the get-go. Of course it is still federally illegal, it is still not a for sure thing, but really, have we ever been remotely this close? There is a lot that needs to be fixed, baby steps of course will show the world that the drug problem lies in it's prohibition, not in it's use necessarily.
 
A Mexican think-tank says the two states may do more damage to the country’s bloodthirsty narcoterrorists than the war on drugs came close to achieving.

Alcide, this is what I was talking about when I said that American & British drug users were not responsible for Mexican deaths. The prohibitors are the responsible ones: they blackened the market.

I wish this author would cite his sources.
 
Sorry to be gloomy, but the WA and CO laws might still be struck down by the Supreme Court once challenged. It already struck down similar laws in the past under the Commerce Clause which says that the Fed has the right to regulate drug laws within its borders.

What case was that specifically? I don't remember laws being struck down. I remember that somebody sued the Federal government to try to abolish the Controlled Substances Act. Tried and failed. Tried and died. At least, that's how I remember it.
 
Im surprised the entire continent of Central and South America have yet to decriminalise marijuana.
 
Last edited:
I seen this coming :) I foresee once half the states legalize Marijuana. The federal government will have little choice other then removing it from schedule 1 substance.
 
At the same time to me it almost seems hard to predict whether someone will be pro or against legal marijuana regardless of political affiliation unless they are very religious or something
i honestly dont know what the current supreme court is like... maybe some used to be hippies back in the 60's and there is hope?
 
^We could only hope

i have a feeling it will be denied by the supreme court. This would be too good to be true

Then again....the end of the world is predicted in december...maybe this has a hand in it 8o
 
seriously i wil be very mad if the end of the world happens as then those awful doomsday preppers on tv would be all like "i told you so, nah nah boo boo"
 
Top