I can understand, and have repeated myself, the desire for transparency and openness on how the site is run. It helps donors feel more comfortable with where their money goes and keeps law enforcement from thinking we're running some sort of drug selling scam. The open information idea helps all parties. \
However, it does become self defeating if we use the opportunity to become a niggling of every decision made

Some of this frustration has already shown through in some of the replies by the owner and admin group, but we're still trying to be as up front as we can. We just don't enjoy being second guessed on a system that is proven to work, has provided safety for the site and members for nearly a decade, and has not caused us any legal issues to date.
Without the offering of ideas, or the review of a current status quo, we could indeed be pissing away more money than necessary or leaving ourselves open to a vulnerability we didn't see coming. In that vein, the ideas are appreciated. Just keep in mind, we're not inclined to fuck with something that is working. If someone wants to do more legwork than we have in finding a host with reasonable hardware and service contracts, in a freindly country, with a live person on the hardware that we are wholly comfortable with and able to reach (as opposed to outtages over the past year because the host was on holiday 8) ), all for a cost
significantly less than we're currently operating with - we'd be more than happy to check into it and see if it makes sense to switch when the current contract is up (I'm not sure if jb signed up for a year, or more, we'll ask him). But at least for 2008, we've shared what our costs are and our desire to build an emergency fund above operating costs (for legal fees of creating legal entities, setting up snail boxes for those who don't trust paypal, etc). We're telling you everything so you know the boat we're in for this year at least.
Beyond that, we can check out other hosts, but they will have a damn hard time beating the sense of security and stability our current host now provides. And, as others have noted, if you think we're overspending or doing less or more than we should - that's your opinion, and your welcome to share constructive ideas or suggestions, but that's a seperate issue from donating - you can still donate, or not, (or extra

) based on how you feel or simply on how you appreciate what this site has done and continues to do for you, and thousands of other people around the globe. Any and all donations are helpful, even if it's a nickel. Any and all constructive suggestions are helpful, so long as it's construtive and a suggestion - niggling or bitching doesn't improve a damn thing.*
*noted, several aren't bitching, I'm just making the point of comments need to be defined. "It could be better" is not defined,
HOW it could be better is, and could be acted upon.