• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe

Does believing in Evolution say a lot about you

Status
Not open for further replies.
And i was under the impression your post was in reference to my posts about evolution being fact?

Never mind.
 
Rico,

Yeah, they have all been "debunked"
debunk this one

Fossilized trees have been found BURIED
upright and in original condition
Now I am fortunate enough to live on a rather big property and am in my woods all the time.
I see dead trees pretty much daily. You know what dead trees do? They rot and fall over.....Timberrrrr

Now how does a tree live for millions of years to be slowly buried by sediment?

Here is where you go to your Evolutionary Gestapo (EG)
for some "imaginative" answer to refute what we can observe.
Again, willfully blind

Google fossil tree standing upright pics
for pretty pictures
 
Last edited:
^Instead of asking endless questions, why won't you answer any yourself?

If not evolution, what? You just sound delusional when you constantly piss on everything other people say without offering a better explanation.

Stop talking about evolution as religion. You are the only one pushing any sort of religious agenda here.
 
Chill....
dont let a little post on a tree get you all shaky
Just post your rebuttal to my last presented point or if you cant kindly move along.

Whether you get answer you want or not your view will be represented
 
methamaniac said:
Chill....
dont let a little post on a tree get you all shaky
Just post your rebuttal to my last presented point or if you cant kindly move along.

Whether you get answer you want or not your view will be represented
Click to expand...
As I stated before, I believe you are very insecure in your own faith. You seem to be simply obsessed with discrediting what others may believe. Everyone believes in different things man. Is proving somebody wrong that important to you? You are very insecure and probably have self esteem issues. Have a good life.
 
To all you who have the patience to continue in this "debate", thank you. It seems futile in a way because it's certain that no one will change meth's mind, but a lot of people will be reading this, and he's definitely making a fool of himself and the creationist perspective. So at least know that it's helping other people learn about science and exposing the ridiculousness of some extreme creationists' perspective.
 
Care to comment on puntuated equilibrium
( absolutely crucial for your faith)
and how it conveniently works
didnt think so
thank you for you participation
Even Richard Dawkins wont commit to this one

Guys Louis Pasteur challenged Darwin's theory.
And debunked idea of spontaneous generation (Darwin supported) with law of biogenisis.
(Note: I didnt say theory)
The man had courage, was father of modern biology/microbiology, rejected Darwin's theory of evolution , and belived in creation

How can you willfully disregard a visible Law just to cling to a theory.
Folks science will go with a theory till something better comes along. I understand this. But if it ain't right it ain't right. The evidence is there if you will look.
I wont mention 2nd Law of thermodynamics, as you have already thrown that one out the window if you believe in evolution.
Inanimate material doesn't come together to make things more organized. Dont pick up your room for a week if and see if it gets more or less organized.

^^^^
I hope a lot of people read this and wake up
 
Last edited:
It's really sort of sad that the methamaniac is the only person who's actualy positing arguments rather than a bunch of immature and idiotic personal attacks.

It really doesn't make you look any smarter when your reply to an argument is, to call a spade a spade, "why are you an idiot?".

(I'll reply after dinner.)
 
http://www.c4id.org.uk/index.php?op...ons-of-darwinism-&catid=52:frontpage&Itemid=1


^^^
Now whats ignorant is punctuated equilibrium.

And scientist having to say a plethora of animals had to invisibly exist 500-800 million years ago
300 million years is a pretty big gap, but I let that slide
What I want let slide is 300 million years without one single dam transitional fossil for proof. Guess what we have to use our "imagination" . Kinda like when they show you
5 to 6 pics of a fish spawning into a man and say, "presto" evolution before your eyes.

We have an EXPLOSION of fossils in the Cambrian layer. All appearing at once.
Big problem for evolution. IT mandates tiny invisible changes steady over millions of years.
Where are the " changes" remains at?

Same place as all the transitional primate to human forms-------- cleverly absent

Look behind the curtain Dorthy

Notice nobody disagreeing with me now that I pulled out the big guns and tore the mask of wizard of oz
 
^I don't disagree with you at all. What you are saying is not even wrong. There's a point when you stop banging your head against the wall.

sekio said:
It's really sort of sad that the methamaniac is the only person who's actualy positing arguments rather than a bunch of immature and idiotic personal attacks.

It really doesn't make you look any smarter when your reply to an argument is, to call a spade a spade, "why are you an idiot?".

(I'll reply after dinner.)
Click to expand...

I dunno, I feel like we may be reading different threads. I haven't seen a heap of civility from the OP, just a lot of passive-aggression.

I don't think what I wrote was similar in any way to how you've characterised it. Then again, I don't even know if you are talking to me or just pretty much everyone. In which case I would wonder at the usefulness of sweeping generalisations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top