DEA Serves Order To Show Cause to Three Walgreens Pharmacies

ugly

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
4,311
Location
FRIZZ
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: DEA Public Affairs

(202) 307-7977


Press Release

DEA Serves Order To Show Cause to Three Walgreens Pharmacies



NOV 28 – (MIAMI, FL) – Mark R. Trouville, Special Agent in Charge of the Miami Field Division, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), announced today the issuance of Orders to Show Cause (OSC) to three Walgreens Florida pharmacies: Walgreens #04727 located at 4950 S. US Highway 1, Fort Piece, FL; Walgreens #03629 located at 12028 Majestic Boulevard, Hudson, FL; and Walgreens #06997 located at 785 Lockwood Boulevard, Oviedo, FL (hereafter “Registrants”). An OSC is served as a notice to a DEA registrant to provide it an opportunity to show cause as to why the DEA should not revoke its DEA registration because its registration is deemed inconsistent with the public interest. These administrative actions do not immediately suspend a registrant’s ability to handle or distribute under its current DEA registration medications containing controlled substances such as oxycodone, hydrocodone or others listed in Schedules II – V.

“The diversion of pharmaceutical controlled substances continues to be a great concern for the DEA,” Trouville said. “A DEA registration is a privilege and not a license for bad behavior. These Registrants have a responsibility to their customers, as well as to the community, to be an advocate against prescription drug abuse that has plagued Florida since 2009, and not contribute to the epidemic. The Miami Field Division will continue to work with our local and state partners to assure that all prescription drugs are getting into the hands of legitimate patients for legitimate medical needs.”

On April 4, 2012, the DEA Miami Diversion Office served an Administrative Inspection Warrant (AIW) on the Registrants, as well as on three other Walgreens pharmacies in Florida and its Walgreens Distribution Center in Jupiter. The AIW at the Walgreens Distribution Center was served to determine if the distribution center maintained a system in place that detects and reports suspicious orders to the DEA and to prevent the diversion of control substances as governed by federal laws and the Control Substance Act relating to the proper distribution of control substances. The AIWs served at the six Walgreens retail pharmacies were done so to determine if the pharmacies were dispensing prescriptions issued for legitimate medical purposes and in the course of professional practice.

On September 14, 2012, the Walgreens Distribution Center was served an Immediate Suspension of Registration. An administrative hearing is scheduled to begin on that matter on January 7, 2013, in Washington, DC.

These actions are part of the DEA Miami Field Division’s continuing efforts to combat the state’s prescription drug abuse epidemic and its role as a major source to other states of diverted pharmaceutical drugs. On average, seven people die every day in Florida due to prescription drug abuse, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. The efforts in recent years have gone beyond arrests and criminal actions against Florida doctors, pain clinic personnel, and individually owned pharmacies that operated outside the scope of legitimate medical purposes. The DEA has utilized numerous resources to educate and work with its registrants and the public to battle this epidemic.

The Registrants may file a written request with the DEA, within 30 days after the receipt of the OSC, for an opportunity of an administrative hearing to determine whether the DEA Certificate of Registration at the Registrants’ locations should be revoked.
 
didn't even know walgreens was back in action here, i know the DEA pulled a major walgreens distribution center's permits not too long ago.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here, specifically, is an excerpt from their privacy policy:

If you access information on our websites, the following basic information is automatically collected and stored on Department of Justice servers:

- The name of the internet domain (for example, "xcompany.com" if you use a private Internet access account, or "yourschool.edu" if you are connecting from a university's domain);
- The Internet Protocol (IP) address (a number that is automatically assigned to your computer when you are using the Internet) from which you access our site;
- The type of browser and operating system used to access our site;
- The date and time you access our site;
- The internet address of the website from which you linked directly to our site; and
- The pages you visit and the information you request.

The Department of Justice does not use this information to track the browsing of individuals who access the site. This information is primarily collected for statistical analysis and technical improvements to the site. This government computer system uses software programs to create summary statistics, which may be used for such purposes as assessing what information is of most and least interest, determining technical design specifications, and identifying system performance or problem areas. In certain circumstances, however, we may take additional steps to identify you based on this information and we may share this information, including your identity, with other government agencies.
 
while i cannot fathom such circumstances mean anything short of doing "market research" with their info or other uses of that magnitude, i def understand hesitation given the nature (tho if i were in a position to be concerned, i probably wouldn't go and voice that i had cause for concern, if you catch my drift). If their site sees an IP pinging it over and over in rapid succession, copy/pasting data in bulk, that kind of thing is prolly what's capable of getting their interest.

i do know i'm much more comfortable speaking on these topics now that i'm much further removed from 'the scene' (not that i didn't have my paperwork at the time, mind you, but in FL sometimes the RX papers aren't worth much more than they're printed on)

It puts us on their radar.
you already knew we were there, and it's more than that- do you honestly doubt that there are no usernames associated with the DEA and/or its agents?
On the radar is where we must be anyways if we ever want to see any positive changes. Ideology /= trafficking, and in my observation, there's an incredible gap between the two in practice anyways (ppl who're trafficking or synthing are wayyyy less likely to be pro-legalization than end-level users, and the DEA could give two shits about end-level usage that's the local LE's venue)
Further, convincing or influencing the opinion of ppl associated w/ the DEA is wayyyy more effective than influencing a random person, no?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you already knew we were there, and it's more than that- do you honestly doubt that there are no usernames associated with the DEA and/or its agents?

This writer was targeted by them, back when this writer spoke much more freely and openly.

But, you know, they can only get what you give them. So why would you download their pages and willingly give them everything? Do you really need to find out more about Walgreens being served orders to show cause (whatever that means)?
 
if you were targetted for simply writing, i hope you trumpeted that shit as loud as possible...would love to hear more details if appropriate (feel free to erase this post if not the direction you'd like to see this go)

/also, can you message me? your box is full.
 
Top