DEA changes AMAs stance on MMJ

chocolope

Bluelighter
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
49
Location
Minneapolis
=D yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay


Activists get the DEA to remove obsolete information from its website claiming that the American Medical Association (AMA) still opposes medical marijuana.

On November 10th, the AMA reversed its long-held position that marijuana has no acceptable medicinal value and adopted a new policy position favoring medical marijuana. The AMA called on the U.S. government to reconsider its current classification as a Schedule I substance. (The government categorizes drugs into “Schedules.” Four of the five actually regulate the use of substances, but Schedule I drugs—such as marijuana, heroin and LSD—are completely banned.)

However, a week after the announcement of this historic reversal, the DEA still hadn’t removed mention of the AMA’s old, anti-medical-marijuana position from its website.

So, the advocacy group Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), an organization of cops, judges and prosecutors calling for the legalization and regulation of all drugs, created an action alert asking U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to order the DEA to scrub the bogus statements from the web.

After just one day of emails from activists, the information disappeared. One might conclude this quick response was the handiwork of Obama’s tech-savvy team, if it weren’t for the other government websites still spreading misinformation about the AMA’s position on medical marijuana. Both the White House “drug czar’s” office and the DEA’s “scare the children” youth website still contain inaccurate statements about AMA’s position on medical marijuana.

http://www.alternet.org/drugs/14441...ng_info_on_the_american_medical_association&/
 
I wonder if many members of the DEA feel betrayed by this change in position. Most of their legitimacy (IMO) comes from being able to justify the harm that they claim. Hopefully some of them are feeling uncomfortable.
 
yea, but that's bullshit that mj causes harm. I am not saying it's safe or there shouldn't be an age limit on smoking if it were to become legal, but we all know mary ain't not worse than booze cigarettes.
 
A small victory for the good guys.

Better than no victory at all.
 
Why? Well atleast 50% is because i was feeling vindicative, the rest probably split between the a bit of moral outrage at people getting killed or imprisoned over weed, that the justification of drugs being illegal mainly comes from the authority of modern medicine.

I really dont know, but i still hope it bothers a few cops.
 
Top