Daring to Ask the PED Question

slimvictor

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
6,477
Location
"Darkness cannot be dissipated with more darkness.
If everyone is secretly suspicious of so many athletic achievements in the 21st century, why aren't we talking about it?

excerpts from article below:

The following anecdote is 100 percent true …

NBA players get tested up to four times during the course of a season. The fourth time can happen at any point from October to June, but once it happens, that's it. So if your fourth test occurs after your 71st game, you're clear the rest of the way. It's a running joke within NBA circles, something of a get-out-of-jail-free card: Once you pee in that fourth cup, you're good to go. Put whatever you want into your body. Feel like smoking enough weed to make Harold and Kumar blush? Knock yourself out. Feel like replacing your blood with cleaner blood so you have more endurance for the playoffs? Knock yourself out. Feel like starting a testosterone cycle because you might have to play 25 grueling playoff games over the next 10 weeks? Knock yourself out. Remember how competitive these guys are. What would they do for an edge? How far would they go? And why are we giving them the choice?

The following anecdote is also 100 percent true …

Not everyone tests for elevated testosterone. For the leagues or sports that do, they must account for people with naturally elevated levels of testosterone. That threshold is higher than you think because they're accounting for biological outliers — some athletes might naturally have twice as much testosterone as the average person. All right, so let's say you're an NFL player that has to test three times higher than the "average" threshold before getting flagged. Conceivably, you could rely on a controlled amount of HGH, something that bumps you up … just not TOO high. Maybe you jack up your testosterone levels a little under three times higher than they should be. Guess what? That's still legal! Do they have patches that can briefly bump up your levels without prolonged traces? Yes, they do! Did one famous athlete (not an NFL player) use that patch on his testicles to bump his levels close to that threshold, fall asleep, keep his patch on too long and subsequently fail his next test? Yes, he did! It's amazing this doesn't happen more often.

The following anecdote is also 100 percent true …

When Bertrand Berry and Ty Warren suffered a complete tear of their triceps, it took them six months to recover. When Arizona left tackle Levi Brown suffered a complete tear of his triceps in August 2012, the Cardinals immediately put him on their season-ending injured list. When Ray Lewis suffered a complete tear of his triceps in mid-October, we thought he was finished for the season … only he returned to action a little more than two months later. During the third month of his "recovery," he made 17 tackles in a double-overtime playoff game in Denver. In 13-degree weather. At age 37.

So when Lewis's name landed in this week's PED scandal, nobody tumbled over in shock. We wasted the rest of Super Bowl week talking about him, wondering whether he cheated, watching his denial for signs that he was lying, Googling "deer antler spray" and talking about everything other than the game. Eventually, the moment will pass, like it always does. Nothing will change. Sadly, the collective irresponsibility of some sports media members — call it "cornballbrotheritis" — ruined any rational media member's chances to question the current environment. You don't trust our ability to handle such a loaded subject, nor should you. We've ruined your trust too many times.

I just know that athletes shouldn't be able to have it both ways. Don't hide behind your players unions and allow your player reps to fight against better drug testing, then flip out if Jalen Rose and I decide to have an impromptu "Who's On Your 'I Need To See You Pee In A Cup' Team This Year?" podcast. Again, we have the technology now. We can protect clean players from competing against dirty ones. Why aren't we using it? Henry Abbott's exhaustive piece on the NBA and PEDs made a fantastic point: Why did FIFA make biological passports (the single best way to catch cheaters right now) mandatory for the 2014 World Cup, but the NBA can't even convince its players to allow blood testing?

Really? You're that fearful of what we'd find in your blood, NBA players? If you're not fearful, why allow your representatives to make it seem like you're that fearful? How can you expect me NOT to wonder if you're cheating? Especially when so many other world-class athletes are cheating? Are you really expecting me to believe that Don MacLean, Matt Geiger, Soumaila Samake, Lindsey Hunter, Darius Miles, Rashard Lewis and O.J. Mayo — seven guys with a combined two All-Star appearances — were the only NBA players who ever used banned performance enhancers?

Let's see what's in everyone's body, once and for all. I think you'd be surprised. You'd wonder if some were glorified junkies. You'd be confused about why we placed such a belated priority on concussion awareness while continuing to ignore HGH and steroids and painkillers. Why wasn't the recent story about the NFL's Toradol waiver a bigger deal? What's the difference between taking HGH and Toradol, anyway? What does the word "performance enhancer" really mean? It's OK to borrow a dead person's ligament to regain your 95-mph fastball, but it's not OK to boost your testosterone for those same results? It's OK to travel to Germany to inject stem cells into your damaged knee to stimulate recovery and regeneration, but it's not OK to replace your blood with better blood to increase your stamina?

How did we decide what's right and wrong? Did we just arbitrarily make up a bunch of rules with no correlation to one another? Why won't our favorite athletes help us out by pushing for more accountability within their sports? The goal should be simple: total transparency. Every American professional league should have the best possible testing. Period. And if athletes don't think it's fair … well, I don't think it's fair that some of them cheat. So there.

I believe that Ray Lewis cheated. I believe that to be true based on circumstantial evidence, his age, his overcompetitiveness, the history of that specific injury, and the fact that his "recovery" made my shit detector start vibrating like a chainsaw.

I believe in my right to write the previous paragraph because athletes pushed us to this point. We need better drug testing. We need blood testing. We need biological passports. We need that stuff now. Not in three years. Not in two years. Now. I don't even know what I am watching anymore.

full article at
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/8904906/daring-ask-ped-question
 
Why can't we just legalise performance enhancers for everyone? Nootropics are legal, "ADD" is an accepted excuse for being on amphetamines, and caffeine is sold to children, not even over the counter. I'm sure the introduction of e.g. HGH and steroids wouldn't change a lot. People already source them illegally in gyms and from grey-market distributors. If you could go to the pharmacy and grab a couple sticks of roll-on transdermal testosterone "deodorant" and a package insert telling you to stop use when you start growing breasts and your liver shuts off, would it not be safer than buying your "juice" from Steve at the gym? Or buying wierd ass peptides from pseudolegit "vendors"?

Maybe I'm just wierded out by the double standard in society. Mental performance enhancers - nicotine, amphetamine, caffeine? Sure those are perfectly acceptable, even children will be put on a course of a powerful NDRI these days. But god forbid you alter your physiology.

Both incur risks, don't get me wrong, but I would say you could get equally as fucked up on amphetamine as you could with a steroid.
 
i think we're slowly transitioning to full use of PED for sports, for academia, for enjoying life. We now live in a culture that is obsessed with drugs, whether medicinal or recreational. It dominates the media, the drug war is a facade and really we all want that edge in whatever we are doing. Maybe it's the result of capitalism and big corporations or just human nature or evolution but it's something that is going to happen and will define our age. In history we'll be seen as a culture, or even on a global scale, a world 'addicted to drugs', something that was definitely not as prevalent in the past. Pharm/drug/PED use is permeating every aspect of our culture and is only becoming more and more apparent as time goes on.
 
Pharm/drug/PED use is permeating every aspect of our culture and is only becoming more and more apparent as time goes on.

+1. Folks are beginning to realize that while excess and abuse are never good, total abstinence from drug use isn't necessarily optimal either.
 
I cant believe that an elite pro athlete would use sports science, technology and chemistry to improve his performance. And I find it hilarious that people who drink, smoke, do prescription drugs, and eat junk food while sitting on the couch, point to pro athletes and call them disgraceful cheaters.
 
Sekio's point about the definition of PED being difficult to verbalize without including many other commonly-used drugs in your definition is very important, I would say.
This is a problem that would not exist if were had less of a slanted view of drugs as a society (or -ies).

Most people who posted above support the idea of athletes freely using PEDs.
I certainly sympathize with this view, and I would like to watch (but not play) sports where everyone was using HGH and testosterone. I like to see people excel, and perform beautifully in a crucial situation (after having just come back from an injury).
I like to see athletes I like come back from injuries faster, too. Who wouldn't?

But those who used PEDs when they were against the rules of the sport did something unfair.
Those who used them when they were not technically illegal did something sneaky but rational (highly motivated). Wasn't even a great need to sneak, in most sports. Nearly everyone was (is?) doing it. Who wouldn't?

In some slight way, it pisses me off a bit that McGwire used PEDs to hit more home runs in a season than Babe Ruth or Roger Maris ever did. I used to revere those records. But now I feel a bit stupid for having done so. Too attached to the numbers, to the past. The future is here. It is interesting to watch how PEDs can push everyone up between a notch or two. I want to see someone hit 100 home runs in a season...and only lead the league by 10.

I feel bad for the athletes that don't want to risk their livers, or don't want to blow up their heads and get hundreds of pimples.
But I don't think that they are the "pure" ones.
This is basically a puritan/Christian idea, maybe.
(I think that they are the ones who are respecting their health over wealth, and I definitely appreciate their vantage point - I am very careful about my health, and would hate to be pressured to use drugs that damage my liver in order to continue my profession)

It seems like a very complicated issue, but basically we have to come down to this:
it is an individual's right to choose what (not) to put into his/her body.
 
Top