• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Crystal Crisis

E-llusion

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Nov 3, 2002
Messages
5,975
A circuit party incident shows just how rampant 'Tina' has become -- and just how indifferent gay men seem to be about it.

It's a picture-perfect Saturday afternoon on South Beach the first weekend in March. There isn't a single cloud in the azure blue sky. It's the kind of day that reminds residents why they live in South Florida, and that goads visitors here by the thousands.

This particular weekend, hordes of gay men have come to South Beach for Winter Party.

At the Surfcomber Hotel, the site of this year's pool party, hundreds of handsome men in seductive swimwear are hanging out by the pool, bumping and grinding on the makeshift dance floor, parading their rippled abs and bulging biceps.

I'm standing with a friend soaking up the sea of flesh when our attention turns to a particularly muscular man with a hairy chest who's wearing a red ball cap. He's absolutely stunning, but it's not his body that grabs our attention. It's his inability to walk without stumbling. "He's really screwed up," my friend comments. "From the look on his face, it's probably Tina."

A Winter Party volunteer, wearing the signature pink T-shirt that helps them stands out in the crowd, approaches the unsteady man and asks if he needs help.

I overhear his friends dismiss the inquiry. "It's OK," they say. "We're his friends." Minutes later, there is a commotion in the packed crowd. The muscular man in the red ball cap has collapsed. His apparently unconscious body is slumped, limp in a white plastic pool chair. Four pink-shirted volunteers have surrounded him now. One of them has two fingers on an artery in the muscleman's neck, as if she is checking whether or not he has a pulse.

A band of volunteers heaves the chair up, and together they carry the unconscious man away. As they push through the crowd, the woman keeps her two fingers on the man's neck, and his pulse.

The crowd hardly pauses, barely seeming to notice that someone has been carried past them. The dance beat cranks, and the bodies continue to gyrate.

It's no secret that crystal meth is rampant at circuit parties all around the country. When I mention the pool party episode to my gay friends, and comment I may want to write about it, the response is almost universal: Big surprise, stop the presses.

And the crystal problem is hardly limited to circuit parties. It's all around us, on a daily basis, and it is wrecking gay men's lives every day -- financially, physically and emotionally. But what strikes me most, perhaps, is the nonchalance surrounding the issue. It's become so routine, many gay men don't even seem to notice it, or perhaps they just don't pay attention to it anymore.

Obviously, the drug use and crystal problem involves a serious issue of personal responsibility. But I can't help but think that there must also be a collective consciousness to this problem, if we as gay men -- as a group of people who have staked the claim that we are connected to one another in some sort of bond that forms a community -- hope to beat it.

In the early years of AIDS, gay activists combed the streets and the bars and the bathhouses, armed with condoms and safer sex fliers, gently reminding other gay men that all our lives were at stake. In our newspapers and our magazines, at our offices and in private homes, people were talking to each other about the risks and perils of unsafe sex, and the need we all had to help each other stay as safe as we could.

It didn't save everyone from HIV, or replace the personal decision-making at the moment of truth. But there was, at least, a recognition that we were all in this together, and that we needed to hold each other's hands, literally and figuratively, because even with the best intentions, we are all human, and we all slip up sometimes.

To some degree, aren't we all supposed to watch out for each other? Particularly in places like Miami and Fort Lauderdale, or the Castro or Chelsea or Provincetown, or any of the other gay ghettos where we've congregated by the droves to create our own little gay Meccas, our insular, protected, safe spaces where we can fashion the kind of world we think is better than the places we came from. Aren't these places, at least -- the places where we've worked so hard to make being gay so easy -- supposed to come with something more than crowded bars and naked pool parties? Or have we created places where we are so callous to each other that we no longer notice, or care, if our community is partying itself to death?

After the pool party, much later that evening, I get a poignant reminder about why, as gay men, we need to care about and care for our own.

It's almost midnight, and I have driven with a date from Fort Lauderdale back down to Miami to go to Winter Party's leather party, at a bar called the Loading Zone. We park no more than two blocks from the bar. I am wearing jeans and a leather harness, without a shirt. My date is also shirtless and in jeans, with a leather vest. Our outfits are typical leather bar gear, and we think nothing of walking dressed this way from our parking spot to the bar.

Apparently, a lot of Miami residents feel otherwise. As we stroll down the street, passersby yell catcalls from their car windows. Then, one car speeds by, and there is a rapid succession of thuds in front of us. My date feels something hit his leg. To my disbelief, I look down to find we've just been pummeled by a barrage of raw eggs. After cleaning off his jeans, we continue to the bar.

There, men seem to walk around wild-eyed. Everyone's drinking water and sucking on lollipops--one sign of people using crystal. We decide to stay only an hour at the Loading Zone. As we leave, we see four guys, acquaintances from Fort Lauderdale, huddled in the shadows behind the bar. There's no doubt in my mind what they are doing.

The next day, Sunday, March 6, I am at Winter Party's beach party, right on the gay beach at 12th Street. The enormous swarm of muscled men dwarfs even the crowd at the previous day's pool party. It's another bright, hot Florida afternoon, and everyone seems to be hanging out shirtless and in sunglasses.

I have my camera in my hand, and I'm taking pictures to publish in the gay newspaper that I edit in Fort Lauderdale. It's something I do frequently at such events, and I understand that different people have various comfort levels with their face being shown in a gay publication.

Initially, I assume that is why so many people decline to remove their sunglasses when they agree to have their picture taken. Then I ask a smooth young Latino in white pants and a sailor's hat to pose, and he gladly agrees. Lean and well-defined, he looks adorable in his little outfit on the beach. But he would look so much cuter without the dark sunglasses that hide too much of his face.

I ask him to remove them, and he emphatically shakes his head no. "I can't show my eyes," he tells me. "They're a mess." Soon after, I come across the muscled man in the red ball cap from the pool party the day before, the one who had been carried away in the chair. He, too, is wearing sunglasses.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Crisis

By Mubarak Dahir, AlterNet.
Posted April 18, 2005.

Link
 
omg another reason why meth is the worst drug ever!
 
While I don't personally like meth, and wouldn't mind seeing less of it around, I hold the same stance as with any other thing in life: Moderation is the key.
 
Nobody can deny the the problem with Crystal in the gay community. It is not being used responsibly and it has huge links to AIDS spread in gay communities. Unprotected anal intercourse in common amongst gay sex parties. Meth a lot of the time is fueling these parties. Getting tweaked, fucking for hours, unprotected with multiple partners is not a good thing. ANybody that knows meth understands this reality.
 
There is no denying the correlation between crystal meth use and increased rates of HIV infection among gay men. To say that comparing the two is sensationalist is to show a true lack of understanding of the enormity of this crisis.
 
"crisis" Drug use is not a crisis, it is a decision. Telling people what to do in the privacy of their home whether it be drugs or telling gay people to be straight, its none of your business. Also, alcohol is a much bigger problem in the gay community, why not try and get rid of a much bigger "problem". You'd think a community of people that are persicuted would somehow relate to drug addicts and how they are percieved. If people want to get clean, only THEY can do it. Also, comparing a disease that killed millions of people, made millions of children orphans, and turned ended up killing a lot of spouses cause their scumbag husband/wife fucked around on them to a drug that kills a handful of its users each year is fucking ignorance. The drug problem, like the aids problem needs to be addressed with harm reduction and if they legalized meth, controlled the quality, provided a safe setting for use, and medication for sleep, meth addiction wouldn't be 1/1000th as bad as it is now. Also, as for the sharing of needles with meth that has nothing to do with meth, but with people not being able to get rigs OTC. What the US government did to drug use might be comparible to what the catholic church did to AIDS by saying condoms don't do anything to prevent aids, and how they are againest condom use, but their totally different.
Don't preach harm reduction with sex cause it saves lives, but blast drug use all together. People arean't going to stop using drugs because people tell them, and if everyone was informed of the real dangers of drugs their would be a lot more drug use cause most people think that LSD can kill you, that heroin is toxic, and that oxycontin is the same as heroin, but of these informed people a much smaller % of them would die, and the same with sex if people are going to do it either way, better to save them and maybe encourage a few that otherwise would be scared shitlessly, than to send them out their in the dark. Just imagine if as many people that thought their was heroin in E, that LSD can make you think your an orange for the rest of your life, and that the first time you use heroin you get hooked though that pulling out your penis from a girls vagina before you ejaculated stopped the chance of AIDS, or prevented pregnancy. The biggest difference between Aids among gays vs meth addiction between gays, almost all gays have sex, many are much more permiscuas than straight people and thus they have a higher chance of getting aids from having unprotected sex. Most gays don't use meth and most that do are not addicted to it, unless their statistic is different than that of the general populas. AIDs is a virus with no cure, addiction even being a disease is thought to be bunk by many scientists and other experts in the field, just look at how many smokers their are and were 60 years ago, if you use a substance and you like it you want to use it again. Everyone is addicted to something and unless addiction is a disease that everyone has, its more likely that AA and NA like 12 step groups came up with this and floated it around for the past 60 years. Ask anyone what would you rather have, AIDS or be a tweaker and I put money that the only people that might say aids are either going to NA or never tried meth, and thats if anyone would even choose that. Just my opinion, but than again I'm not a gay tweaker, nor a tweaker with AIDS, but I know if I did have AIDS I would do as many drugs as I could afford.
 
Last edited:
^^^First of all, use fucking paragraph breaks.

Also, alcohol is a much bigger problem in the gay community, why not try and get rid of a much bigger "problem".

Have you actually read any literature on the relationship between HIV and crystal meth? No similar relationship exists between alcohol use and HIV infection.


The drug problem, like the aids problem needs to be addressed with harm reduction and if they legalized meth, controlled the quality, provided a safe setting for use, and medication for sleep, meth addiction wouldn't be 1/1000th as bad as it is now.

Legalizing meth is not the answer. Gays use meth regardless of its status, regardless of its purity. It's the associated behaviors that accompany its use that is the problem.

Also, as for the sharing of needles with meth that has nothing to do with meth, but with people not being able to get rigs OTC.

Again, you're missing the connection. HIV infection and crystal meth use is tied together because of risky behavior, not specifically the sharing of needles. In fact, the majority of gay crystal users do not inject, but rather snort or smoke it.

Just my opinion, but than again I'm not a gay tweaker, nor a tweaker with AIDS, but I know if I did have AIDS I would do as many drugs as I could afford.

This only solidifies the obvious realization that you don't know what you're talking about. Don't try to post about topics which you clearly have no grasp.
 
Legalizing meth is not the answer. Gays use meth regardless of its status, regardless of its purity. It's the associated behaviors that accompany its use that is the problem.

i believe the middle ground between full legalisation and prohibition is a license system. if, in order to purchase meth, you must complete a course (with test) that prepares you for difficulties that arise, and lets you know any warning signs of addiction and otehr problems, i think the OD and addiction rate would plummet if the license were free or at low cost--almost every user would eitehr have attended this course or be using with someone who has
 
that make is a fucking increadibly good idea qwe - good thinking
 
i dont see any problem with gay men using meth and having lots of sex where they all KNOW they are risking catching aids. it would be one thing if the gay community didnt know about aids, but because they do, its just their choices that are causing their problems, let them make their choices and leave them the fuck alone.

and as far as O.D.s go, meth is like one of the harder drugs to straight up die from, you will have many problems and serious medical issues before death actually occurs, compared to coke and depressant drugs(by far the most popular drugs) the O.D. potential is a joke. the issue is aids here, and bringing up over doses is just weakening their argument.
 
Tying in together methamphetamines, gays and AIDS. If people cannot rationalize the ludicrousness of this then they deserve to be a gay person, with AIDS and addicted to meth.
 
"Obviously, the drug use and crystal problem involves a serious issue of personal responsibility. But I can't help but think that there must also be a collective consciousness to this problem, if we as gay men -- as a group of people who have staked the claim that we are connected to one another in some sort of bond that forms a community -- hope to beat it."

This, buddy, is where your opinion is wrong. THE issue IS personal responsibility. Go ahead and use crystal, but do it as safely as possible, and above all, moderately. Go ahead and fuck a bunch of people for four, eight, twelve hours straight whatever, but wrap some latex around your dick first, alright?

You as gay men aren't the group bonded. We as people are. If everyone did their individual part to be as safe as possible, then the collective consciousness would be looking out for itself. Go ahead and encourage preaching, intervention, or whatever you think one person is supposed to do to another to keep them from the harm of drugs and AIDS, and see what it gets you. Your problems aren't gonna go away like that, because you can't control someone. You've got to teach them to control themselves.
 
The drug problem, like the aids problem needs to be addressed with harm reduction and if they legalized meth, controlled the quality, provided a safe setting for use, and medication for sleep, meth addiction wouldn't be 1/1000th as bad as it is now.

Guess again mate!
Nothing like a simple solution for a complicated problem eh?

I guess this is more of an american issue, over here in Europe meth is practically nonexistent.

But i wonder, with amfetamines you normally have problems getting/maintaning erections. Is this not true for meth? Or they just munch Viagra along with it?
 
i dont see any problem with gay men using meth and having lots of sex where they all KNOW they are risking catching aids. it would be one thing if the gay community didnt know about aids, but because they do, its just their choices that are causing their problems, let them make their choices and leave them the fuck alone.

So, we should leave all the folks in Africa to die because, by god, they know that theirs is the worst area for AIDS and if they're having sex, it's their fault, we should just leave them the fuck alone?

Give me a break.

One of the problems with crystal meth use is the tendency of many people to engage in unprotected and uninhibited sex while under the influence; that is, they sometimes engage in behavior they wouldn't otherwise while sober. Now, this isn't to say that they shouldn't know what they're getting into, but it underscores the seriousness of the problem.

On the flip side, some of the men who use crystal DO use condoms. However, the lengthy and rougher sex that often takes place results in a much higher likelihood that the condom will break. Additionally, some men who have receptive anal sex while on speed are less sensitive to pain responses and may be inclined to have more aggressive sex for longer periods where injury is more likely to occur and the risk of HIV infection is increased.

I'm not sure which is worse - those of you who fail to appreciate the seriousness of this crisis, or those of you who decry gays and would rather assign blame than even entertain possible answers or solutions to the problem? :\
 
chugs said:
that make is a fucking increadibly good idea qwe - good thinking

thanks
its based on leary's philosophy
 
How exactly is granting meth a quasi-legal status going to affect those who use it for the primary purpose of enhancing sex? While OD rates (although not a HUGE problem) would likely be reduced, I highly doubt any change in gays' behavior would result.

Moreover, allowing some to have the drug and not others is going to continue fueling an underground market whereby gays (or anyone else for that matter) can easily score some dope from their friends.

Furthermore, going through an actual class to become educated about such a dirty drug would certainly carry with it some negative stigma, something that many 30-something gay professionals would rather avoid, even more so if they know a guy who has a license already.

I think the overall idea of harm reduction and education certainly has its place, but this approach, especially concerning a drug like crystal meth, and especially considering the underlying issues of drug use and risky sex, lacks any real probability of success.
 
^

the class could include information on why meth causes an increase in aides, and information on how to test yourself for aides

yes they can get meth from friends, however why not go to the class to buy for yourself if the class is very cheap or free? also, as i said in my original post, most people will be doing meth after having gone to the class OR being with someone who has gone to the class. hence those who have gone ot the class will be more able to handle situations that arise

perhaps it should be anonymous?
 
*shrug*

Maybe I'm biased. I just know first hand how meth has destroyed the lives of my friends, gay and straight, and the costs that come with its continued abuse.

Something definitely needs to be done. I just don't think granting any sort of legal status to the drug - thus making it easier to obtain - would benefit anyone.

With that said, I think any program that seeks to educate those who are going to use drugs anyway about meth's associated risks, can only help.
 
qwe said:
i believe the middle ground between full legalisation and prohibition is a license system. if, in order to purchase meth, you must complete a course (with test) that prepares you for difficulties that arise, and lets you know any warning signs of addiction and otehr problems, i think the OD and addiction rate would plummet if the license were free or at low cost--almost every user would eitehr have attended this course or be using with someone who has

Unfortunately, we live in a reality of wealthy retards running everything.
 
Top