chugs
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2004
- Messages
- 2,025
Although i empathise with anyone who has been raped i wonder if "throwing the book" at them will stop it from happening. I've been the victim of crime and i know many friends and family who have also been affected by crime.
Yet we've been throwing the book at murders and rapist for decades, if not centuries and it does nothing, it doesn't prevent crime nor does it sate the victims need for satisfaction.
The problem i see with crime is that in reality it's a health/genetic problem. Yes, murder, crimes of violence etc.
Take crimes of violence. For hundreds of thousands of years humankind has glorified humans which extol in violence and aggression. These men are given the best women, allowed to acquire wealth (i guess they take it really), are allowed to propagate their genes. It has only really been in the last 100 years that we've suddenly realised that aggression on the scale our genetics impose on us has created the situation we have before us. There is no balance or equilruibum in our system, violent men are allowed, if not encouraged yet victims are told to hold back on revenge and allow "the system" to get them satisfaction.
We sway back and forth on the crux of an advanced society which seeks to solve it's problems at the root (for example remove the gene and treat the individual to abhor violence) whilst we continue to glorify all types of violent occupation and sports. We hate the idea of a state removing choice, by genetic/psychological reprogramming yet we think by imprisoning those who fuck up that this is somehow a solution.
For every rapist you put in jail that person will come out even worse then when they went in. They'll go on to hurt and fuck up yet more people. And what for, a misguided attempt to sate a victims pain?
How does that fix the victims pain, by imposing pain on the perpetrator? Yes they need to be punished but the hell holes we call jail are not the solution (and never were).
Yet we've been throwing the book at murders and rapist for decades, if not centuries and it does nothing, it doesn't prevent crime nor does it sate the victims need for satisfaction.
The problem i see with crime is that in reality it's a health/genetic problem. Yes, murder, crimes of violence etc.
Take crimes of violence. For hundreds of thousands of years humankind has glorified humans which extol in violence and aggression. These men are given the best women, allowed to acquire wealth (i guess they take it really), are allowed to propagate their genes. It has only really been in the last 100 years that we've suddenly realised that aggression on the scale our genetics impose on us has created the situation we have before us. There is no balance or equilruibum in our system, violent men are allowed, if not encouraged yet victims are told to hold back on revenge and allow "the system" to get them satisfaction.
We sway back and forth on the crux of an advanced society which seeks to solve it's problems at the root (for example remove the gene and treat the individual to abhor violence) whilst we continue to glorify all types of violent occupation and sports. We hate the idea of a state removing choice, by genetic/psychological reprogramming yet we think by imprisoning those who fuck up that this is somehow a solution.
For every rapist you put in jail that person will come out even worse then when they went in. They'll go on to hurt and fuck up yet more people. And what for, a misguided attempt to sate a victims pain?
How does that fix the victims pain, by imposing pain on the perpetrator? Yes they need to be punished but the hell holes we call jail are not the solution (and never were).
Last edited: