Crime bosses say sharemarkets are for suckers

bit_pattern

Ex-Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
8,127
Crime bosses say sharemarkets are for suckers
Date
February 24, 2014 - 1:34PM

Even international drug traffickers need investment advisers.

That was Robert Mazur's job when he went undercover for the US government in the 1980s and '90s. Posing as a Mob-connected businessman, he helped the Medellin drug cartel launder and invest its suitcases full of cash.

Investors live on hope and it's the criminal's job to take advantage of that hope.

His clients were "the biggest crooks in the world," says Mazur, author of The Infiltrator: My Secret Life Inside the Dirty Banks Behind Pablo Escobar's Medellin Cartel.

Sam Antar says white collar crime is now easier thanks to a lack of resources for authorities.
Yet they "always told me that they don't gamble," Mazur says. "They don't take risk, which is why the stock market was of absolutely no interest to them."

Wait, criminals don't like risk? Murder, drug trafficking, fraud and bribery - all okay. But propose buying them shares of Twitter or Tesla, and they freak?

Investing, by definition, means trusting others. You must believe chief financial officers aren't cooking the books and rely on people like Mark Zuckerberg to make smart use of the billions at their disposal. For criminals who thrive on taking advantage of trust that's not an easy sell.

Convicted felon Sam E. Antar says stock-picking - trusting in people and numbers you can't directly verify - sets you up as a mark for the unscrupulous.

Antar was the chief financial officer of Crazy Eddie, Inc., an electronics chain led by Sam's cousin, Eddie Antar. The chain collapsed under the weight of its fraud in 1989. "Investors live on hope and it's the criminal's job to take advantage of that hope," Antar says.

The fact that he got caught is no consolation, Antar says. Regulators and investigative reporters have been losing the resources to uncover fraud. He points out, correctly, that the number of FBI white-collar crime prosecutions has fallen by half since the 1990s.

Antar now speaks on white-collar fraud, often to law enforcement groups, runs a website on the topic and consults for law firms suing on behalf of investors.

"If I wanted to be a scam artist today, I could be very, very successful," he says.

"I'd probably have less risk of being prosecuted and far less risk of going to prison." But as he also points out, criminals are as short-sighted as the rest of us, maybe more so. "Nobody ever plans on failure," he says. "The prisons are full of people who never planned on being there."

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/mark...for-suckers-20140224-33b3l.html#ixzz2uDBb1dwZ
 
There are different definitions of risk. Illegal business practices are certainly lucrative and provide a much higher and more consistently positive rate of return. On the other hand, they also introduce the risk of imprisonment.

A lot of people seem to have this concept of investing that it's about gambling with money and being risky. More often, it's about minimizing risk while earning an acceptable rate of interest. The long term goal is security, and being a criminal does not provide security. Being a criminal provides fast money at considerable risk.
 
Wait, criminals don't like risk? Murder, drug trafficking, fraud and bribery - all okay. But propose buying them shares of Twitter or Tesla, and they freak?

I wouldn't invest in Twitter either. I might invest in tech stocks that had good business plan and were going to be profitable. Just having alot of users with few ways to turn that user base into money doesn't seem like a good idea to me. I remember when Yahoo bought Geocities (the free make your own webpage service) for a billion dollars, it was only a few years later they shut it down because all it ever did was lose them money. Being a popular website means jack unless you are able to monetize that large user base. Stocks in Twitter or FB were going up just because they both kept getting bigger, now growth is slowing and as people realize these sites are lame and leave so their user base will shrink. Social media stocks are a bad idea for investing IMO. Even the number of users was over estimated as many people have 10 accounts. If i spent 10 grand on drugs and sold it to my friends that is low risk and a fast and large profit. Investing it in Twitter would be like throwing it away on a fad.
 
Top