Crackdown on bitcoins?

teological

Bluelighter
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
475
Location
Morefeindville
http://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/states-put-heat-bitcoin-002600584.html

..

States Put Heat on Bitcoin
The Wall Street JournalBy Robin Sidel | The Wall Street Journal – Wed, Jun 26, 2013 10:26 AM AEST...
.


Email



Print
...

.
.

Related Content.
.
.SALT LAKE CITY, UT - APRIL 26: Software engineer Mike Caldwell shows the front of a physical Bitcoin he minted in his shop on April 26, 2013 in Sandy, Utah. Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency used over the Internet that is gaining in popularity worldwide. (Photo by George Frey/Getty Images)View Photo.
SALT LAKE CITY, UT - APRIL 26: Software engineer Mike Caldwell shows the front of a physical Bitcoin he minted in his shop on April 26, 2013 in Sandy, Utah. Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency used over the Internet that is gaining in popularity worldwide. (Photo by George Frey/Getty Images)

..
.
.


State regulators are warning virtual-currency exchanges and other companies that deal with bitcoin that they could be closed down if their activities run afoul of state money-transmission laws, according to people familiar with the matter.

According to people familiar with the situation, banking regulators in California, New York and Virginia in recent weeks have issued letters telling the companies that they need to follow the state rules or prove that the rules don't apply to them.

The warnings fall short of formal "cease and desist" orders, which would demand that the companies immediately stop engaging in their business, these people said.

Still, the moves show that state regulators have moved beyond merely scrutinizing virtual currencies and now are taking steps to prevent people and companies from using them for illegal activities. Federal regulators already are cracking down on virtual currencies.

Similar actions are expected from other states in coming weeks and months, according to people familiar with the matter. California, New York and Virginia are three of the 48 states that require the companies to obtain money-transmission licenses to operate. South Carolina and Montana don't have such rules.

The money-transmission rules vary among states, but most require detailed financial data, business strategy and information about the company's management. States also typically require companies to put up a bond that could run as high as several million dollars.

The actions aren't related to the announcement last week that Mt. Gox, the largest bitcoin trading exchange, has halted withdrawals of customer funds in U.S. dollars. The Tokyo company said it was making system improvements.

Unlike dollars or euros that are backed by a central bank, bitcoin users can create the units in a process called "mining." Users also can trade the currency on a number of exchanges or swap it privately.

The state actions come three months after federal regulators issued guidelines placing virtual-currency exchanges under the same comprehensive anti-money-laundering requirements as traditional money-transmission businesses such as Western Union Co. Since then, a handful of bitcoin exchanges have registered with the U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

The California Department of Financial Institutions has issued at least three warnings to bitcoin-related companies in recent weeks, according to people familiar with the actions. One of the recipients is the Bitcoin Foundation, an industry-backed group that promotes the digital cash.

Patrick Murck, general counsel for the Bitcoin Foundation, said it is a nonprofit organization and doesn't engage in money transmission. The group is formulating its response to the letter it received from regulators last week.

A spokeswoman for the California banking department declined to comment on the warning letters, saying the communications are confidential and "the goal is safety and soundness and compliance with the laws that DFI enforces."

California is particularly important to the bitcoin community because many of the startup companies that are tied to the virtual currency are based there. California and New York are known for having stricter money-transmission laws than other states.
Bloomberg News Bitcoin supporter Peter Vessenes
"Bitcoin businesses are spending a lot of time and energy figuring out how to stay out of California," said Peter Vessenes, chief executive of CoinLab, a Bainbridge Island, Wash., company that has registered as a money-services business with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. CoinLab is waiting to launch any exchange-related services until it gets its "state licensing strategy sorted," said Mr. Vessenes, who also is chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation.

The New York Department of Financial Services issued a similar letter to BitInstant, a New York company that allows customers to buy and sell bitcoins. The company earlier this month alerted customers on its website that it wasn't accepting cash deposits "as we make steps to transition to our new website."

Charlie Shrem, chief executive of BitInstant, couldn't be reached for comment. The company has registered as a money-services business with federal regulators.

"Virtual currency firms inhabit an evolving and sometimes murky corner of the financial world," Benjamin Lawsky, superintendent of New York's Department of Financial Services, said in an interview.

"The extent and nature of their operations morph constantly, so it's important for regulators to ask the hard questions and stay ahead of the curve in order to root out dangerous or illegal activity," he said.

In Virginia, a company called Tangible Cryptography suspended the purchase of the currency through its service called FastCash4Bitcoins after receiving a letter from state regulators who received a complaint that the company was operating as an unlicensed money transmitter, according to a notice on its website. Company representatives couldn't be reached for comment.

Tangible Cryptography said on its website that its activity is exempt from licensing requirements and that the commission's initial assessment contained factual errors.

"While we respond to the commission's notice, the prudent action is for the company to suspend all new transactions," the company said.

A spokesman for the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions declined to comment on whether it has issued similar notices to other companies.

Write to Robin Sidel at [email protected] and Andrew R. Johnson at [email protected]


More From The Wall Street Journal
•The Fed Signals a Slow Down; Traders Head for the Exits

•http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323836504578553463435747322.html

•Missing the Target

.. .
.
@y7finance on Twitter..
. .
.

Sponsored Links.
.
.
Australian Stock Report

www.AustralianStockReport.com.au

Free Trial - Our Team will show you which Shares to Buy & Sell Everyday


Dividend Stocks To Buy
 
All this does is take Bitcoin down a notch but it encourages further development of cryptocurrency. What needs to happen now is for the exchanges to kowtow respectfully to the state while someone releases a Bitcoin fork which encrypts or otherwise obsfucates transactions instead of publishing them openly as is the case with Bitcoin. Without wallet addresses being spewed into the public domain every time a transaction occurs, there would no longer be a way to tie anyone cashing out to any transactions other than the exchange transaction.
 
Not surprised at all by this turn of events. The greed and lust for power in America's capitalist society is sickening.

While reading this article, I was constantly reminded about a film regarding the 2008 Wall Street stock market crash, about how the rich got richer, and how the middle-class and poor got poorer. Now I know it's only a movie, but it's obviously based on a true story. A true story which many of you were probably personally affected by.

There's this scene near the end of the film where the antagonist starts to voice his opinion on the matter to protagonist, who lost his job, his wife, his house, and just about everything else. And I just wanted to share what this piece of shit (very convincing acting IMO) has to say:

You know that there's not a person on this earth that's worth over a hundred million dollars that came by that money honestly?

The Vanderbilts, the Carnegies, the Gettys, the Morgans, the Hursts, the Rockafellers...

They just annexed territories and licenses and businesses and killed the native population and imported slaves and sold guns to both the north and the south during the Civil War and they're heroes, they're American heroes!

We teach our children, what... honesty and hard work are the keys to success?

My children... my children are not gonna go off to some war, they're gonna go to Yale, they're gonna go to Harvard.

And it's gonna be the dumb, stupid, white trash kids and the black ghetto kids that are gonna fight America's senseless wars and they're gonna protect American security and business, and it's gonna be my business.

My business is gonna be richer and richer and my bonuses are gonna get bigger and bigger, and it's the same old story.

It's the bankers and the owners and the advisors that get rich!

And it's the little people, who buy their stock and always lose in the end - people like you!

It's a free trade system, my friend.

That's capitalism.

That's competition in a capitalist society, that's how the cream always rises to the top.

That's how the strong survive and the weak die off.


So yeah, regarding bitcoins - I think that sadly it's just a matter of time before some angry, greedy conservative, backed by many other angry and greedy conservatives, drafts a bill which will make it either prohibitively expensive or outright illegal for bitcoin exchange companies to continue operating in the US. And they'll make sure that it's passed and signed into law by President Obama. And of course the rest of the western world will probably, eventually follow suit.

It really is the same old story I'm afraid. The selfish politicians can't get the bitcoin companies to give them a share of the profits in a civil manner. So they make it mandatory in the form of new laws without consulting with any of us like a true democracy should. And again, it's bloody sickening to witness how greedy some of these old farts can be.

Ya know - I read somewhere that the 10th richest American has enough money to provide shelter for every single homeless person living in the US? I can't remember where though, but if I manage to find the article, I'll share it. Crazy shit huh?
 
Top