• REAGENT TESTING & DRUG CHECKING Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Featured Link 1 Featured Link 2
  • RT&DC Moderators: Senior Staff

Confirmed MDA

A

auto50048

Greenlighter
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
7
Just wanted to give some a heads up. I picked up some molly (sold as molly anyway) a few weeks ago. It was capped pretty sloppily, but was a fine white crystaline substance I used a triple reagent, which showed it to be straight MDA (i dont know how common this is). I chewed out my buddy about it, but he convinced me that the effects were almost identical and that I should try one. After looking on some of the trip reports, I was conviced to give it a try. I should say that I was visiting family in north Texas at the time (DFW).

I measured out approx 150 mg.

The experience lasted about 6 hours and was not a positive feeling in my opinion. I felt a little edgy, while at the same time felt somewhat sedated. There was no euphoria that I had felt previously with MDMA. I found myself hoping that the effects would wear off, because I didnt feel good.

For the record, I have rolled about 10-15 times in my life. I usually space them out about 1-3 months and never take more than a couple of beans.

I know that there are those that say that MDA is a pretty close comparison to MDMA. Maybe this is true for some, but I was definately not true in my experience.

Just wanted to put that out there in case anyone had been getting this.

Does anyone know why they would even market MDA? I mean, isnt it just as easy to forumlate MDMA?
 
lulz you can find synths all over the internet, its not illegal to discuss what theoretically one would do to synthesize MDA. Or probably even to not use theoretically.
 
For one, the reason you had an uncomfortable time was because you took a pretty big dose (150mg). MDA is mg per mg more potent than MDMA, requiring 60-80mg for effects. Imagine someone not used to MDMA taking 200mg's+ at once, they would possibly have an overwhelming experience, Ive seen it happen. About the "why would they market it". Not to go into details but the process for synthing both is pretty similar, and depending on the route it can be simpler and definitely more cost-effective (cuz its more potent) to make MDA.
 
Shulgin said MDA is a bit less potent milligram for milligram, if i remember right. It is easier, it seems, to synthesize MDA.
 
starbursts said:
you are paranoid as shit.
Click to expand...

/agree

Bluelight stays away from the discussion because it's illegal, and could give unwanted attention to the site.

But I just searched google and found a huge 27 Page document covering every single aspect of making your own MDMA.
This is the internet, if you wanted to find out how to break in to the pentagon, although illegal, I'm sure you could find viable information on www.google.com
 
LSDMDMA&8155173 said:
Shulgin said MDA is a bit less potent milligram for milligram, if i remember right. It is easier, it seems, to synthesize MDA.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure MDA is stronger mg for mg

It sounds like you took too much. The reason they make it is for people like me, who find MDA to be better than mdma. The majority of people I know prefer MDA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top