Colorado Recreational Marijuana Sales Exceed $5 Million In First Week

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
32,765
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
n-MARIJUANA-large.jpg



"Colorado Recreational Marijuana Sales Exceed $5 Million In First Week

Colorado marijuana dispensaries made huge sales in the first week of legal recreational marijuana.

Owners of the 37 new dispensaries around the state reported first week retail sales to The Huffington Post that, when added together, were roughly $5 million.

That's a lot of green for Colorado's legal weed.

Colorado, the first state to allow retail recreational marijuana sales to adults age 21 and older, has projected nearly $600 million in combined wholesale and retail marijuana sales annually. The state, which expects to collect nearly $70 million in tax revenue from pot sales this year, won't have its first official glimpse at sales figures until Feb. 20, when businesses are required to file January tax reports, according to Julie Postlethwait of the state Marijuana Enforcement Division.

Denver's 9News was first to report statewide retail sales on New Year's Day, the first day legal pot shops were allowed to operate, exceeded $1 million. Interest dropped in the days that followed, according to shop owners, but many reported customers still waiting in lines out the door.

"Every day that we've been in business since Jan. 1 has been better than my best day of business ever," Andy Williams, owner of Denver's Medicine Man dispensary, told The Huffington Post.

Owners of larger shops told HuffPost they sold from 50 pounds to 60 pounds of marijuana in the first week. Smaller shops sold 20 pounds to 30 pounds, proprietors said.

Under state law, Colorado residents may legally buy up to one ounce of marijuana in a transaction. Tourists can purchase up to one-fourth ounce.

But the initial rush to buy legal weed was so great that many shops imposed caps on the amount each customer could buy, or raised prices to curb demand and stave off a possible shortage. So far, none of the retailers reported supply problems.

Prices also were boosted by the state's 25 percent tax on retail purchases, including a 15 percent excise tax and a 10 percent sales tax. Voters approved the levy in November. Local taxes can add more to what customers pay.

Shop owners said their sales were biggest the first day. Each day since, sales have been roughly half the New Year's Day volume, the business owners said.

One-eighth of an ounce of marijuana was selling for an average of $65 around the first of the year, according to Marijuana.com.

Despite the surging sales, Joaquin Ortega, co-owner of Denver Kush Club dispensary, was quick to note to HuffPost that federal laws against marijuana sales and possession present obstacles to Colorado's legal retailers. The Justice Department has said it won't challenge legalization laws in Washington state and Colorado as long as the states prevent out-of-state distribution, sales to minors and drugged driving, among other conditions.

Still, the federal prohibition means banks won't accept marijuana businesses for traditional bank accounts, and retailers said they can't take advantage of traditional business tax writeoffs.

"People think we all became millionaires," Ortega said. "But as a business owner, I can't write anything off for the last three years."

Banks have said they fear they could be implicated as money launderers if they offer traditional banking services to the pot businesses.

Marijuana businesses often cannot accept credit cards, leaving them to conduct transactions in cash. They say that's a burden for taxes and payroll, and a safety risk.

Monday night, Denver City Council urged banking regulators to grant Colorado marijuana businesses access to the federal banking system, so they can use the same banking services as other businesses.

Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colo.) is seeking reformed access to banking for marijuana businesses with his Marijuana Business Access to Banking Act (H.R. 2652), which would create protections for banks that offer services to state-sanctioned marijuana-related businesses.

"The banking legislation sponsored by Congressman Ed Perlmutter is a common sense approach to bring financial legitimacy to the legal marijuana industry," Denver City Councilman Albus Brooks told HuffPost. "It's ludicrous and unsustainable to force large neighborhood businesses to operate entirely with cash. Congress needs to act, and act now."

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that the Department of Justice is also drafting legal guidance on how banks can work with marijuana businesses in states like Colorado and Washington, which both legalized recreational marijuana for adults 21 and over.

Dispensaries in Washington state are expected to open later in 2014."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/08/marijuana-sales-colorado_n_4552371.html
 
This whole thing is going along nicely. Rest of the world please take note.

Hopefully the banks will change their tune in time?
 
This is awesome.
Who didn't see this money coming, legal marujuana should be in every state there's so much money to be made.

If I owned a bank I'd be balls deep in that money by now!
 
I bet the Feds are hoping for a wave of dispensary robberies caused by the cash policy that they can blame on the fictitious criminogenic effect of cannabis.

On a side note, why must they base their prices on the artificially inflated back market price then add taxes from there? I suppose it is because people are still willing to pay it but holy fuck, it's worth more than many precious metals per gram...

Past your northern border it goes for 25-35 dollars a gram, and it's mostly dank even if bought from a punk still living with his parents.
 
I still can't figure why so many people are considering this surprising in the least.

I know more pot smokers than I know Christians, priests, judges, Jews, homosexuals, heterosexuals, women above the age of 47, and Labradors named 'Benny' combined.

People smoke pot.

They've done that since I was a wee lad.

Thank goodness they can do it in at least 2 states out 50 without the threats of legislative righteousness threatening their resolve.
 
I still can't figure why so many people are considering this surprising in the least.

I know more pot smokers than I know Christians, priests, judges, Jews, homosexuals, heterosexuals, women above the age of 47, and Labradors named 'Benny' combined.

People smoke pot.

They've done that since I was a wee lad.

Thank goodness they can do it in at least 2 states out 50 without the threats of legislative righteousness threatening their resolve.

Everybody smoke pot.
Not really every one but pretty much every one smokes pot.
 
Im not sure what you are saying here pmose.. cause if you are arguing against DOA then your study actually backs him up.. what are you saying?

"suggesting that marijuana use may just influence the likelihood of getting caught committing these crimes."

from the study you posted.. so in other word MJ helps likely helps catch criminals?
The study does not back his statements nor yours.
That quote you took is not about property and income-producing crimes; it was about violent crimes.
MJ helps catch criminals? I do not get it.
 
Last edited:
Is english your first language?

"suggesting that marijuana use may just influence the likelihood of getting caught committing these crimes."

in other words MJ may help catch criminals..
Again, all I can do is repeat everything I said and say again that you are wrong.
The study found marijuana does not influence the probability of someone, in the group studied, commiting a violent crime. It does not help anyone catch violent criminals, it hurts criminals by making them easier to catch.
 
A sentence is commonly defined as "a complete unit of thought." Normally, a sentence expresses a relationship, conveys a command, voices a question, or describes someone or something. It begins with a capital letter and ends with a period, question mark, or exclamation mark.

The basic parts of a sentence are the subject and the verb. The subject is usually a person, place, or thing. The predicate (or verb) usually follows the subject and identifies an action or a state of being. You can identify the subject and the predicate the following short sentence:

MJ may help catch criminals.

In this sentence, the subject is a noun: MJ; the verb--help--shows action and answers the question, "What does the subject do?".

In addition to serving as subjects, nouns may also function as objects in sentences. Instead of performing the action, as subjects usually do. Objects receive the action and usually follow the verb.

The following sentence answers the question, "What was hurt?", it also demonstrates that pronouns may serve as subjects and as objects:

It hurts them.

The subject pronoun 'It' stood for MJ and object pronoun "them" stood for criminals.

The common object pronouns are me, you, him, her, it, us, and them. They take the place of nouns in a sentence.

The common subject pronouns are I, you, he, she, it, we, and they.

You should be able to identify the main parts of the basic sentence unit: SUBJECT plus VERB, or SUBJECT plus VERB plus OBJECT. Examine the following sentence:

MJ helps catch criminals?

The subject names what the sentence is about, the verb tells what the subject does or is, and the object receives the action of the verb. Although many other structures can be added to the basic unit, the pattern of SUBJECT plus VERB plus OBJECT can be found in even the longest and most complicated structures.

This can be looked upon as two independent sentences; the first has an object which is the subject of the second, "MJ helps [noun] catch criminals." This missing noun we can assume to be, "police":

Police catch criminals.
MJ helps police.

Indeed police do catch criminals and we presume marijuana causes criminals to get caught, but criminals do not want to get caught, so it would not really be "helping" them.
Police use cars, batons, and neighborhood watch groups to catch criminals; criminals use marijuana to catch a high. Nobody uses marijuana to stop violent crime.

(This was mostly plagiarized from http://grammar.about.com/od/basicsentencegrammar/a/sentenceunit.htm)
 
Last edited:
…And hopefully it will shape and change the rest of America and then other parts of the word soon too, including Australia. It's going to be hard for out politicians here to criticise cannabis now that obama has come out with this statement recently.

I'm hoping this is the catalyst for worldwide change with regards to cannabis laws and use and legality.
 
yawn.. if criminals are easier to catch then this aids catching them


but back to the main point of this thread mad amounts of people are smoking weed and nothing bad is happening......
No. Just stop it.
If the pronoun "this" somehow means "criminals are easier to catch" then the statement would be true; it would also be intensely trivial. It would be like saying ouchies hurt because they ouchies.
It is obvious by "this" you mean "marijuana". Which is what you were saying earlier. Ugh. I will speak in metaphor:
Healthy legs help velociraptors catch cavemen.
Broken appendages cause cavemen to get caught (you would not say getting caught helps the caveman. Would you?)
The situation helps velociraptors, yes, but there is no logic to a literal interpretation of the statement, "Broken legs help catch cavemen."
Do brontosaurus go about the day breaking caveman legs to help veloci... OK, I see perhaps this metaphor has run cold.
Police neither smoke nor is anyone, other than you, suggesting that we should supply pot to help police catch violent criminals.
....
Is that the main point of this thread? Well shoot, I guess the point is wrong.
I of course came here to make fun of the potheads for spending $5m on emptiness, but everyone does that anyway. Oh the pain.
....
People are smoking weed. Yes.
Bad things are not happening. No.
Is smoking pot... somehow related to these bad things?
 
…And hopefully it will shape and change the rest of America and then other parts of the word soon too, including Australia. It's going to be hard for out politicians here to criticise cannabis now that obama has come out with this statement recently.

I'm hoping this is the catalyst for worldwide change with regards to cannabis laws and use and legality.
I keep hoping the next time I shit that gold comes out. If making pot legal does more harm than good, we can only speculate. I guess no and have seen way more pro-legal propaganda bullshit than fucking stars in the sky. The supposed "potheads' burden" of drug propaganda is nonsense. Refer Madness is how old and who gives a shit?
Just be aware of the capital system you just got sold into/have been living in (the 10% of the pop. smoking pot) and if you get called a loser for smoking pot, maybe that is because people are d-bags. Just do not wasted. The pro arguments are ridonkulous. Alcohol may be bad but it is legal. Don't get wasted. Prescription drugs are a huge problem and they are legal. Don't get wasted. Making pot legal is not going to change pot. It will increase harm. They did not make it illegal just to piss off the Chinese/Mexicans/Blacks and suck up to lumber industrialsts. There is always going to be profit, idiotic discrimination, and lines of conspiracy.
 
Making pot legal is not going to change pot.

It may change some things, like labelling of THC and CBD %'s and what strain it is and stuff like that. Currently here people buy street pot and most of the time they dont know how potent it is at all and what is added etc, there has been stories passed around here that some dealers or distributors add stuff to the pot to make it heavier or stickier and things like that, stuff that isnt natural at all.
 
Top