How can one separate "visual representations" from "thoughts"? I suppose I am asking whether "thought" isn't just a global term for mental phenomena such as visual imagery, sub-vocalisation and etc.Weebl8bob said:Strange.. ever since I was little I saw these patterns without the use of psychoactives and always assumed that it was a visual representation of my thoughts so to speak........
I'm not sure how you can tell those apart. I guess that if they stay the way they are, no matter what you think about, it's like you're "seeing" them. If the drug works directly on the visual brain area, you could say you "see" them (as opposed to having weird concepts in the mind that you just "visualize"). There was a thread about this quite recently in PD already.Do you actually see them? Or do you imagine them?
True. That's FAQ material...you don't see ANYTHING with your eyes, but with your brain
In connection with the previous quotation, a very good point as well.When you look at an image, you don't see the whole image but instead infer what the image is and your brain fills in the rest. There's tons of optical illusions that play on this. I think hallucinogens make this ability of your brain hyperactive, so that your brain fills in more than what's there (or in the case of CEVs, fills in nothing).
psychedelicious said:I see lattice-tunnels (following Jack Cowan's and his (?) posse's research) during periods of physical strain and intense physical activity. I used to say that the pattern was like the magnetic field, but with a duplicate set of field lines rotated 90* and overlayed onto the first set of field lines.
I made a thread about this a while ago - fascinating! I just made this in photoshop - very close to the patterns I see:
![]()
The pattern floats in my focal point/center of vision.
Awesome thread!
The pattern floats in my focal point/center of vision.
Beenhead said:^ It sounds like you have never seen classic CEV. They are patterns overlayed on the back of your eyelids, just like you see the grass. Except your eyes are closed and they are incredibly detailed patterns, not grass.
They generally occur in all their brilliance during higher doses.
I believe the brain is sending junk signals to the visual centers of the brain, and the brain sees patterns. They are there and its not in the minds eye, or imagination. They are as real as looking at the pattern on a beautiful rug or curtain, just behind closed eyes.
But these types of patterns only occur with the use of 5ht2a psychedelics, marijuana does not do it, nor does anticholinergics.
When you look at an image, you don't see the whole image but instead infer what the image is and your brain fills in the rest. There's tons of optical illusions that play on this. I think hallucinogens make this ability of your brain hyperactive, so that your brain fills in more than what's there (or in the case of CEVs, fills in nothing).
someone should genetically engineer mushrooms that produce 2ce that would be the shit X ten
However there is a very interesting study that took place in Leipzig about 15 years ago. Jochen Gartz, a mushroom explorer whom I know quite well, has done some fascinating studies with Psilocybe species by raising them on solid media containing strange tryptamines that are alien to the mushroom. Apparently the enzymes that are responsible for the 4-hydroxy group of psilocin are indifferent to what it is they choose to 4-hydroxylate. He has taken things like DPT or DIPT and put them in the growth media and the fruiting bodies that came out contain 4-hydroxy-DPT or 4-hydroxy-DIPT instead of psilocin. In fact, he has a patent on the process. These active compounds are made by the mushroom so they really are natural and yet they never have been observed in nature. I'll give you even odds that if you put spores of a psilocybe species on cow droppings loaded with 5-MeO-DMT you would come out with mushrooms containing 4,5-HO-MeO-DMT. This way you avoid a 10 step synthesis by growing a psychoactive mushroom that contains no illegal drug.