cengsuz
Greenlighter
Either way is fine if the guy is clean.
I chose to not have my son cut cause genitial mutilation is wrong. any woman that doesnt like an uncut member just might want to look in between her legs, see the beauty and the correlation, and then get with the natural program.. unless that is you think that gential mutialion, like cutting the clit of a woman is acceptable.
my preference is and always will be circumcised. guys that have a bunch of skin hanging are easily prone to bacteria and stis if they don't wash and are not hygienic.
I'm actually in the UK, and initially the idea of a circumcised penis horrified me. My first serious BF was uncut, but my current partner is cut and I prefer it actually. Cut all the way.
I enjoy bottoming(being to taker not the giver in gay sex) and medium sized, fat/thick and circumcised with a very defined mushroom head they usually call it feels so so good inside, it rubs your prostate and I can cum without touching anything!
Of course we do. It's called orthodontics
so will you get your son to have all his teeth out? braces shape the direction teeth grow. not the same as removing them
on a side note it was the fashion in my grandmothers time to have all the teeth removed as a wedding present
What a lot of people don't realize is that circumcision causes a lot of sexual dysfunction for couples. The male foreskin serves a purpose to hold in the female lubrication. If the male is cut, then the lubrication leaks out around the edges during sex which makes it harder to stay lubricated. People think it's natural to have dryness issues during sex, but it's not -- it's the circumcision. Well, I'm sure there are other times dryness can occur (not aroused enough, not drinking enough, etc.), but you get the idea. This is why the number one "sex aid" product in America is lube. However, artificial lubes make things too lubricated or not enough, can be sticky, messy, etc.
In addition, even though cut men may not remember the circumcision when they were babies, we really cannot know for sure that it is not leaving behind some kind of psychological trauma or scarring. It's an unnatural act of mutilation. I expect there was a time, thousands of years ago, that there was a problem with too many foreskin infections in ancient Hebrew days because they had no soap, limited access to clean water, maybe some new STD spread, and this was a practical remedy which seemed to help, so they kept it up and figured God approved since they had fewer problems. It's similar to prohibitions on pork, that likely resulted from there being too many issues with people dying from undercooked pork or unsafe handling of it. These old religions "customs" start out for a practical purpose, and then are later just called "will of God" as a shortcut. But eventually, they outlive their usefulness. Today's modern standards of hygiene make circumcision unnecessary.
~psychoblast~
I circumcised my son and now his penis looks magnificent. No scalpel and no blood.
Come at me Flannel you fucking pussy. I'd bitch slap you down so hard you'd wish you could still feel the end of your own cock.
Why do you want to attack me just for sticking up for the rights of a defenceless child?