• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: Senior Staff

circumcision: do you have a preference for your sexual partner?

circumcised or uncircumcised- preference in your partner

  • i'm a female who prefers circumcised

    Votes: 8 21.6%
  • i'm a female who prefers uncircumcised

    Votes: 5 13.5%
  • i'm a male who prefers circumcised

    Votes: 10 27.0%
  • i'm a male who prefers uncircumcised

    Votes: 15 40.5%

  • Total voters
    37
Status
Not open for further replies.
I chose to not have my son cut cause genitial mutilation is wrong. any woman that doesnt like an uncut member just might want to look in between her legs, see the beauty and the correlation, and then get with the natural program.. unless that is you think that gential mutialion, like cutting the clit of a woman is acceptable.

Agree with you totally.
 
#savetheforeskin
I prefer uncut men BUT if you're cut I won't hold it against you because most of the time it wasn't your decision to get cut in the first place. A lot of awareness needs to raised to stop this unnecessary mutilation, circumcision isn't common-place in Australia anymore but obviously this is still an issue in the States. I've seen videos of babies being circumcised and it broke my heart that so many are forced to go through such pain for fucked up reasons such as "Looking like Daddy".
 
my preference is and always will be circumcised. guys that have a bunch of skin hanging are easily prone to bacteria and stis if they don't wash and are not hygienic.

There have been studies linking circumcision to a decrease in the likelihood of contracting HIV, simply because body fluids from whoever you've recently shagged can get lodged in there, but of course you should be using condoms and washing between sexual encounters anyway.

I'm actually in the UK, and initially the idea of a circumcised penis horrified me. My first serious BF was uncut, but my current partner is cut and I prefer it actually. Cut all the way.

I'm also in the UK, and all of my early male partners were uncut. Then I met a cut fella and I have to say I preferred it. Particularly because this guy was very into receiving blow-jobs, and as a wise woman once said to me regarding getting her (now adult) son cut, "It'd be nicer for girls to suck on"

And that has been my experience, pretty much.

Also, though I've only had the one cut partner, it pretty quickly and repeatedly became obvious that any loss in sensitivity was kind of channeled into stamina, turn-around time and endurance.

To be honest, reading what I've written, I'd say circumcision does more for the pleasure of some (not all, we all have preferences y'all) recipient of a cock than the actual man who has to carry the dangling thing around.

I enjoy bottoming(being to taker not the giver in gay sex) and medium sized, fat/thick and circumcised with a very defined mushroom head they usually call it feels so so good inside, it rubs your prostate and I can cum without touching anything!

Yeah, I think it depends a lot on the individual genitals in question, but from a lady perspective, that mushroom head thing totally helps (me at least) reach vaginal orgasm quicker. So again, it seems to benefit the receiver
 
Last edited:
I cannot do uncircumcised because the whole anteater thing freaks me out. I came across a guy who wasn't circumcised and it turned me off. I'm OCD and all the thoughts of how unclean some people can be stopped me from having sex for a long time. I was celibate from July 2007 until the guy I'm with now, but I wish that I had remained celibate because getting laid after a long period of being celibate, then have the guy not want to put out like a bitch is frustrating as hell. I would rather not have had sex period. I kinda wish he had been uncircumcised and no matter how much I cared for him, I would not have had sex with him. Even when I was in my faze of having a guy come through, turn me out, get me off, and leave, I always checked to make sure he did not have a turtleneck for his mushroom. The head of the dick is so beautiful and makes it tempting to worship the dick. That's just me.
 
Before the internet I had no idea htis was such a a heated debate. In USA pretty much the norm to be cut (at least for white folk, and to be honest most my black/minority friends are, at least the ones I've talked bout it with)

Personally, I'm happy with myself and I'm cut.. Sex feels amazing (sometimes a little too amazing ... If you know what I mean guys "slow down for a sec.... OK go")

It seems hetero guys are the most butthurt about this, which is odd, seeing as they are never on the receiving end.

Why so much frustration? Seriously? I understand the debate of doing it to an unconsenting kid... But as far as adults? Who gives a fuck
 
Last edited:
so will you get your son to have all his teeth out? braces shape the direction teeth grow. not the same as removing them

on a side note it was the fashion in my grandmothers time to have all the teeth removed as a wedding present

Otherwise healthy Teeth are removed every day for cosmetic reasons.
 
I still feel severely heartbroken as a result of watching a video of this being done to a baby.

To this day I still suffer from nightmares but it's the deep sadness knowing that babies are being strapped down and having this torture and damage inflicted on them for the most ridiculous reasons or for no reasons at all that really fucks me up. I still get horribly violent urges to smash stuff up, throw furniture around and kick down walls. Sometimes I just go into a terrible rage where all I can do is scream 120dB+ until I shred my voicebox.

Then I break down and cry.

I will never recover from seeing that video. That was in late April/early May last year.

I forget exactly what day it was but a sum of money was sent to someone in China about 3 days later, and a parcel containing enough Nembutal to take out a bull turned up 2 weeks later.

I used up all the Nembutal just to get to sleep and I honestly wish I had kept half of it because 12.5g is more than enough to do the job. Here in Australia, customs have really wised up and lots of parcels are not getting through so I am not going to bother trying to get any.

Looks like I'll be visiting the shrink a lot...I cant count the number of different meds I have tried in a vain attempt to eliminate the distress.

I cant even sleep properly any more.
 
What a lot of people don't realize is that circumcision causes a lot of sexual dysfunction for couples. The male foreskin serves a purpose to hold in the female lubrication. If the male is cut, then the lubrication leaks out around the edges during sex which makes it harder to stay lubricated. People think it's natural to have dryness issues during sex, but it's not -- it's the circumcision. Well, I'm sure there are other times dryness can occur (not aroused enough, not drinking enough, etc.), but you get the idea. This is why the number one "sex aid" product in America is lube. However, artificial lubes make things too lubricated or not enough, can be sticky, messy, etc.

In addition, even though cut men may not remember the circumcision when they were babies, we really cannot know for sure that it is not leaving behind some kind of psychological trauma or scarring. It's an unnatural act of mutilation. I expect there was a time, thousands of years ago, that there was a problem with too many foreskin infections in ancient Hebrew days because they had no soap, limited access to clean water, maybe some new STD spread, and this was a practical remedy which seemed to help, so they kept it up and figured God approved since they had fewer problems. It's similar to prohibitions on pork, that likely resulted from there being too many issues with people dying from undercooked pork or unsafe handling of it. These old religions "customs" start out for a practical purpose, and then are later just called "will of God" as a shortcut. But eventually, they outlive their usefulness. Today's modern standards of hygiene make circumcision unnecessary.

~psychoblast~
 
What a lot of people don't realize is that circumcision causes a lot of sexual dysfunction for couples. The male foreskin serves a purpose to hold in the female lubrication. If the male is cut, then the lubrication leaks out around the edges during sex which makes it harder to stay lubricated. People think it's natural to have dryness issues during sex, but it's not -- it's the circumcision. Well, I'm sure there are other times dryness can occur (not aroused enough, not drinking enough, etc.), but you get the idea. This is why the number one "sex aid" product in America is lube. However, artificial lubes make things too lubricated or not enough, can be sticky, messy, etc.

In addition, even though cut men may not remember the circumcision when they were babies, we really cannot know for sure that it is not leaving behind some kind of psychological trauma or scarring. It's an unnatural act of mutilation. I expect there was a time, thousands of years ago, that there was a problem with too many foreskin infections in ancient Hebrew days because they had no soap, limited access to clean water, maybe some new STD spread, and this was a practical remedy which seemed to help, so they kept it up and figured God approved since they had fewer problems. It's similar to prohibitions on pork, that likely resulted from there being too many issues with people dying from undercooked pork or unsafe handling of it. These old religions "customs" start out for a practical purpose, and then are later just called "will of God" as a shortcut. But eventually, they outlive their usefulness. Today's modern standards of hygiene make circumcision unnecessary.

~psychoblast~

Thanks for sharing all the info. Well, I'm glad that I don't need lube because I would be in trouble. Lol I am too old to wrap my brain around getting used to foreskin on a pens. Plus, the look of it bothers me and I will have difficulty getting in the mood to give a BJ. I get anxiety just thinking about it. I just can't imagine it at all.
 
Colin, it does serve one benefit - to provide an income for a bunch of scumbags who like to sexually assault babies.

Just because this shit happens in a doctors office does not change the fact that it is calculated sexual assault.

Let's just say I hope I never see anyone doing this to a baby. I'd probably take that sharp thing out of their hands and stick it in their eyes or their neck.
 
I circumcised my son and now his penis looks magnificent. No scalpel and no blood.

Come at me Flannel you fucking pussy. I'd bitch slap you down so hard you'd wish you could still feel the end of your own cock.
 
Why do you want to attack me just for sticking up for the rights of a defenceless child?

You need to take a look at why I am so upset and angry about.

You stripped your son of the most sensitive part of his penis and you make me look like I'm the bad guy?

No, you are the bad guy. You had no right to hurt your son like that. Have a look at the following link and tell me you feel the same way about this disgusting practice:

http://www.moralogous.com/2012/04/29/the-purpose-of-circumcision-is-to-ruin-male-sexuality/

Just take a good look at it. Then go and check this out too:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...9/myths-about-circumcision-you-likely-believe

Maybe, just maybe you will understand my anger.

Do you support abortion rights by any chance? The key argument for abortion rights is the right to control what happens to one's own body. If you do support abortion then why did you deny your son the right to control what happens to his private parts too? Why can't those rights be extended to protect the right to genital integrity?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top