by supporting nazis, you are supporting people who are actively attempting to stifle - and outlaw - free speech.
backing nazis is extremely counter productive if you honestly do care about free speech.
but it's a total red herring. nazis pretend to be oppressed when they are prevented from oppressing others.
this whole point seems completely lost on you, which is why it's ironic that you think arguing
against fascist mobs is arguing against free speech - when it is the exact opposite. i would argue that counter protesters are the the people fighting for free speech.
have you read or heard the sort of violent rhetoric these nazis come out with?
they're not making pie-in-the-sky speeches, they're threatening violence and genocide, and praising fascist groups like Golden Dawn who regularly murder opponents and people of colour in Greece.
fresco said:
Thats actually the best way. Identify them, and publicly shame them.
Now think about it, if you were not allow them to march, then how would you be able to locate them all??
see, some people say doxxing is highly unethical, because you may bring suffering to the lives of people who have no connection to nazi politics (such as nazis' families, children etc - or cases of mistaken identity).
if you really think these people
should be "named and shamed", why support their campaign of public intimidation and vilification in the first place?
but to answer your question, plenty of fascists and alt-right turds have been doxxed in the last 12 months - long before they had any sort of street presence, so allowing them to form lynch mobs is not a requirement of outing them.
