Mariposa
Bluelight Crew
morninggloryseed said:It would have to be a federal prosecution to get you under tha analogue law, but there are weird local laws they can charge you with. They can say it was fake MDMA if they want to, and charge you for trying to sell that. That doesn't mean they will win, but if they do bring up charges it's going to cost you a bit of money for a lawyer.
Basically it will all come down to your prior record, your attitude and demeanor in court, and how good of a lawyer you have. The federal government is not going to get involved over one capsule but if they do bring charges, it's going to be a headache in the least. But I doubt you are going to go to jail over one capsule of 2C-I. Probation at the most. Unless you have a terrible prior record.
SD- I agree with morninggloryseed's post in its entirety. The Analogue Act is a federal law and it is overwhelmingly doubtful that they'd even attempt to extend it to one capsule of 2C-I.
Charges against individuals in possession of research chemicals are somewhat uncharted territory under the law.
I'm not a chemist- perhaps someone who has more knowledge about testing of RCs can provide some enlightenment of how easy or difficult it is to discern 2C-I (which is not federally scheduled as yet) from other RCs in the 2-C family.
The underage drinking charge was a citation. You weren't driving, so this is not a matter for which you could be charged with a DUI. If I am incorrect in my assumption, please provide clarification- but you can't get a DUI unless you were operating a vehicle.
A plea of not guilty seems to be the appropriate course of action to take here. If you hire an attorney, the attorney can always attack the method by which the 2C-I was tested if the test results come up such that the substance was illegal.