Brighton considers drug-use rooms in bid to reduce deaths

foolsgold

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
12,898
Location
about finished with this world
Brighton could become the first city in the UK to provide rooms where people would be able to use illegal drugs safely without the fear of prosecution.

Their use is one of the recommendations in an independent report commissioned by Brighton and Hove City Council.

The aim would be to reduce drug-related deaths in a city described as having had "a drug abuse problem for decades".

But critics said the move could amount to colluding with poor lifestyle choices, or even illegal behaviour.

Sussex Police welcomed the report but emphasised the importance of a "holistic approach" to illegal drugs.

The research by the Independent Drugs Commission for Brighton and Hove proposes providing consumption rooms - often referred to as shooting galleries - where people could use their own illegal drugs under the supervision of professional healthcare workers.

They would provide medical care if required.

'Illegal behaviour'
The intention is to reduce the risk of overdoses and other drug-related deaths, as well as decreasing the amount of drug-taking on the streets of Brighton.

It also suggests making Naloxone, a prescription drug which can prevent fatal overdoses, directly available to users.

Services for young drug takers should also be separated, according to the report, to prevent them mixing with older, more established users.

Mike Trace, vice-chairman of the commission, told BBC Radio 4's Today: "We have said to the authorities in Brighton that you need to look at this because it's something that could reduce drug-related deaths - which is an issue in the city - but also because it could take a lot of public drug use and drug markets off the street."

He said there were various models that could be adopted - for example drugs provided by medical professionals, or users buying illegal drugs and using them in the rooms.

However, there was a "grey area" over whether a law change would be required for this sort of service, he said.

Councillor Rob Jarrett, chairman of the council's adult care and health committee, said the area had had a problem with drug abuse "for decades" and the council would take the recommendations "very seriously".


But Chip Somers, chief executive of Focus 12, an abstinence-based rehabilitation centre, told the Today Programme: "We've got the balance between providing addicts with care and harm reduction techniques completely out of proportion and we're now colluding with really quite poor lifestyle choice and in this case illegal behaviour."

The potential cost of any such project has not been revealed - but Mr Somers said it would be "very expensive" and "for that sort of money you could put 40 or 50 people through a complete rehabilitation project".

Nic Newman, a recovering addict, warned there could be a risk that addicts would be encouraged to use drugs more than they would have otherwise.

"Some people might take more risks if [they are] in a clinic with a managed room. With nurses on hand I can push the boundaries a bit more, can't I?" he told BBC Breakfast.

'Big issue'
The commission consists of 10 local experts - including Kate McKenzie, mother of recovering drug addict Hannah McKenzie - who have been working over the past year on recommendations to reduce the dangers of drugs in Brighton.

More than 60,000 people in Brighton and Hove, which has a population of just over 270,000, have used drugs, according to the commission. They include more than 2,000 problem heroin and cocaine users.

For several years Brighton had more drug-related deaths than any other city in the UK - in 2000, 67 residents died from drug misuse.

In 2011, Brighton saw 22 drug-related deaths - nine per 100,000 people over the age of 16 - making it eighth in the table of UK drug-related deaths.

Ch Supt Nev Kemp, divisional commander for Brighton and Hove, welcomed the report, adding the recommendations would be discussed.

Decriminalised consumption rooms are in use in Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, Norway, Switzerland, Canada and Australia.

In the UK, King's College London is carrying out a study on administering diamorphine (medical-grade heroin) to addicts to reduce heroin use.

In Vancouver, a facility named Insite allows users to take their own drugs in a supervised environment. It has operated since 2003 under a constitutional exemption from Canadian drug laws.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22188476
 
Well there is certainly some good common sense there. Now lets do it already. Oh and maybe legalizing the substances so purity and strength are known and to take the black market and crime out of drugs would also be a good idea. Oh and the money made off it could be used to improve our societies in so many ways.. did you here that you greedy people.. money money money..
 
Last edited:
They trialled this over 6 years ago, I always wondered if anything ever came of that. Perhaps that's the problem with radical reform, especially when politics ultimately gets involved, and we all know opinion matters more than the result....

Excerpt from an article dated november 2007

The first British injecting clinic opened in south London two years ago, funded by the Home Office and the Department of Health. Two more were opened, in Darlington last year and in Brighton two months ago. During the trial, a third of the volunteer addicts take the heroin substitute methadone orally, while a third inject it under supervision. The remaining third, observed by nurses, attend twice a day to inject themselves with diamorphine – or pure heroin – which is imported from Switzerland and provided by the clinic. Professor Strang said: "The rules are incredibly strict. There is no 'take-away' at all [to avoid the users selling their drugs on the streets]. All injections are witnessed at the clinic.

The approach introduces routine and drudgery by forcing the users to attend for their fix twice a day. The nurses have become quite involved, telling users off about their bad practice or lack of hygiene. "I was quite surprised how, after decades of injecting, some users were still so bad at it."

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...ooting-galleries-hailed-a-success-758729.html

If my memory serves me, this was also reported by BBC News, if I come across the links I'll post it up.
 
"Supervised injection site" is the term you want to use, not drug use rooms or "shooting gallery" which was probably last used in a 70's movie. Insite in Vancouver has been going a while, despite even our Prime Minister saying he wants it shut down.
 
Well there is certainly some good common sense there. Now lets do it already. Oh and maybe legalizing the substances so purity and strength are known and to take the black market and crime out of drugs would also be a good idea. Oh and the money made off it could be used to improve our societies in so many ways.. did you hear that you greedy people.. money money money..


to right drugs are a multi billion pound business think of all the free school meals and shit that can fund
 
It goes so far past lunches its sick... this is a comparison just based on what is spent right now.. it does not even figure in the taxation profits.

Drug War Clock

If this is all based on correct data.. then by the end of this year we will have spent about 60 billion to try and fail at preventing what the people want..

Education 98.0 -67.1 271.3 632.7 934 total US spending in billions this year >source< its such an completely unfunny joke I dont even need to comment.. pluss thier heads are so far up thier own asses they couldn't hear anyway.. really you guys should be shamed.. really ashamed.. it reached the point of being pathetic long ago


Defense 856.5 0.0 1.2 0.0 857.7 >source< (defense of what.. defense against a truely amazing life quality for everyone on earth?)

Sometimes there isn't any room to laugh.. WTF
 
Last edited:
I know and why bother right it seems to do know good.. but we just have to keep putting the statistics out there.. what allot of people forget is that if we spend that sort of money.. someones making that sort of money.. need to get rid of the bribery.. oh wait im sorry lobby system in the US.
 
no sorry what i wrote sounds like i did not care was just in a bad mood . i just have to look at this way i have a 20 plus year habit spending £3000 a year on it roughly works out £60000 plus for that time £60000 thats just stupid and where has that money gone back into the community no funding crime that i would be sickened by and the likes
 
This makes sense, certainly a step in the right direction. Let's get talking about drugs, instead of just ignoring them and sweeping them under the carpet.
 
Top