*seconds pekkie comment*
I think rationality is overated. There is no foreseeable end, as it is limited by social constraints and the pursuit of objectivity. When someone says "be rational" often this means either, see things from my perspective or conform to social norms [at least how I see it]. Any pursuit of true objectivity is limited to how much you are yourself [objective meaning existing outside the mind in the real universe]. The realisation of this sprouted a whole school of art and philosophy "absurdism".
Rather than judging maturity through using rationality as a indefinite distinction use plur and spread the prophets weeeerdz

. I dont think I'll ever be in a position to judge the rationality of others effectively, but cause I'm a stinky judgemental human I'll do it anyway.
Any gender related convictions on irrationality would have to be directly related to physiognomy or gender roles to hold any sway. I could understand any perceptions each other being hormonal or biorhythm defined, but these vary so much from individual to individual with age and gender that I think broad generalisations are way too inconclusive at this point.
The only time I think I have been close to objectivity is in moments of ego dissolution. Whether these be drug induced delusions of grandeur or not I'll never know, but ine thing remains clear. When in a normal mode of thought I have never once been able to step outside my experience to judge others. So considering we're all products of our experience could we perhaps see our way round to not judging the validity of others.
[/diluted messy pseudophilosophical nonsense]
[and what is it with me and brackets?

]