• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!
  • MDMA Moderators: Esperighanto

BK-Worth it???

anazillaaah

anazillaaah

Greenlighter
Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Messages
19
Location
AT-AT-ATL
I got some point and a half caps of BK and i'm wondering if they're worth the money. What are some good things about it? What are some bad things? So far, i just noticed it took about 2.25 points to get me rolling so i guess it's weaker that mdma.
 
yeah methylone IS weaker than mdma but its healthier fer ya too
if its worth it...thats for you to decide lol
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methylone

According to the information on Wikipedia, bk-MDMA releases 1/3 the amount of serotonin per mg vs. MDMA. By that standard, I can understand the idea that it's "healthier".

To me, methylone feels exactly like MDMA in every way, except it's duration is shorter, and it never feels as intense with euphoria. One notable different I experience that I enjoy, is that the wearing off of bk-MDMA is oddly pleasant and calming, rather than fiendish like MDMA can be.

I'd research bk-MDMA on Erowid, and view the trip reports. You will also find a section there called "health problems" which gives you some indication of what negative responses people have had. It is a research chemical, with far less history of use than MDMA, so I wouldn't venture to say it's confirmed "safer", it just seems to be gentler.
 
Hi,

BK is only worth it when you can't get real MD. It's also much cheaper.
I find the comedown not worth it, MDMA is harsh too but the high is magic.
Methylone is fiendish because you need to take a lot more than MDMA.
 
Technically, BK is weaker but I found the euphoria and stimulation stronger than quality MDMA and have heard others say the same. The only difference was the duration, which is entirely too short IMO. BK does have a comedown, but no lingering next-day depression like MDMA. For me anyhoo. YMMV
 
Bsiren said:
According to the information on Wikipedia, bk-MDMA releases 1/3 the amount of serotonin per mg vs. MDMA. By that standard, I can understand the idea that it's "healthier".
Click to expand...
...anyone forgot to mention dopamine? :\

When purely looking at 'dosage required for getting high', bk-MDMA (MDMC) is about 60% the potency of MDMA. But the high is also (slightly) more speedy, lasts shorter and overall there is a higher urge for (compulsive) redosing. So there are a few different angles to assess it's worth relative to MDMA.

If those caps are worth the money is for yourself to decide, especially since you can't disclose any pricing information on here. Where I'm from (NL), MDMA is generally twice as expensive as MDMC (and thus MDMC is not really regarded as a cost-effective alternative as far as I know). But I wouldn't be surprised if this is more leaning towards three or four times as expensive in other countries, making MDMC a better alternative when purely looking at the economical side.
 
BK is a good alternative, people seem to really like it.
I have a lot of experience with this compound and let me tell you the come down is the same as with MDMA. I've had a whole week of depression because of this. I then decided the high was not worth it.
But it remains a cheap high similar to X and pure if you have a good source.
But if you can get decent pills or molly... go for it.
 
I've seen BK sold as Molly pretty often at festivals, as it's cheaper and a lot of people (example: average concert goer) can't seem to tell the difference (but these are the same people who buy clearly fake pressed pills from sketchy gang members roaming the crowds).

Personally I like BK, but I wouldn't choose to use it if quality MDMA was available, as it is weaker and not as intense. If you get the dose right it can be really similar to Ecstasy, but if you've rolled enough you can spot the difference. One thing is for sure though: it is very moreish. Typically after a good roll, you don't have a huge urge to redose, but that is not the case with BK.

I disagree with it being "healthier" for you though. Drugs are drugs.
 
reptilian said:
Then surely people would just take 3x more?
Click to expand...
Nope, it's a bullshit statement on Wikipedia. The dose-response relationship is never linear, but rather sigmoidal. So it is not really possible for a substance to have an effect that is three times bigger in an absolute sense. A substance could be three times more potent in a relative matter, but if you would take three times less it could just as well be that you find no effect because you don't reach threshold.
 
Have to say depending on the context Methylone can be better that MDMA. Less of a come down, pleasant high and no pupil dilation. Sleep can be a little blocked but if you get off then you dont wake 4 hours later wide eyed like MDMA. Saying that of course for a full on night MDMA is the winner. And I cant get Methylone at all anymore in Dublin whereas MDMA is everywhere. Such a shame as I would kill for some Methylone
 
I get almost no comedown lameness from methylone. MDMA always left me feeling exhausted the whole next day (although those were usually pills, so who knows what else I was getting), but even if I redose methylone again and again, the next morning I just feel a little spacey for a few hours. I discovered methylone after not being able to find MDMA for over a year, and now I hardly miss "the real thing".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top