Bath Salts Ban

These are what need banning, no valid research use. Not the cannabinoids, who knows, maybe one of those cures/hinders a certain cancer? But mephedrone's bad effects outweigh any imaginable good effects.
 
Phew thank god they're only going after "bath salts"...I guess the "plant food" I picked up at my local smoke shop is ok then. Haha for real though, it appears mephedrone has hit US headshops...finally.

Fuck all this banning is fucking stupid. It accomplishes nothing. How much longer is this stupid shit going to go on for?
 
The Network said:
These are what need banning, no valid research use. Not the cannabinoids, who knows, maybe one of those cures/hinders a certain cancer? But mephedrone's bad effects outweigh any imaginable good effects.
Click to expand...

You don't know what you are talking about.

1 of them might cure / hinder certain cancer. Mephedrone might do that to? They might also cause cancer / psychosis / brain damage / liver damage / parkinsons / aids.

All drugs should be legal.
 
^ Yeah 1/1000 uses resulting in death is totally acceptable for FDA-approval. No matter what it cures. FUCK, IF IT FOUND FUCKING OSAMA WHEN YOU SMOKED IT AND MAKE A SMOKE TRAIL THERE, KILLING 1/1000 PEOPLE ISN'T ACCEPTABLE.
Fucking moron.
 
^ What are you talking about? Are you saying that 1 out of 1000 uses kills someone? Bullshit.
 
1/1000 people who use meph dying is innaccurate. As far as I know, either none or only a few people have died from mephedrone alone. A few people have died from combining it with other drugs.

The relative dangers of a drug aren't good logical grounds for making it illegal. This is because, no matter what you do, people will continue to do drugs. By legalizing drugs you ensure several things- 1. Drug gangs don't exist. 2. Drug use contributes to the economy. 3. Those people who choose to get high can aquire clean, safe (in terms of cuts etc) drugs and means to use them. 4. The prisons aren't filled with people who did nothing but make a personal choice.

People should be allowed to do what they want to themselves. If you want to smoke meth, I think you should be able to aquire clean meth and the supplies to use it as safely as possible without the risk of prison. I think education and health services should be provided. If you want to do drugs that are harmful, then at least you could do them as safely as possible if they were legal.

Whether a drug is harmful or not has nothing to do with whether it should be legal or not. They should require the makers of these bath salts and incense and fertilizer and what not to include a list of ingredients. That's not going to happen though, because it would require them to allow these products to be sold for human consumption.
 
This is a huge blow to me, I dont know about you guys. But for some reason when I used these bath salts as intended in the bath, It really worked well to relax me. I haven't found anything that's as nice to take a bath with. My life wont be complete with this bath salt gone, i'll just be forced to go back to a inferior bath salt....

People must of been getting to clean from this ish.
 
The Network said:
These are what need banning, no valid research use. Not the cannabinoids, who knows, maybe one of those cures/hinders a certain cancer? But mephedrone's bad effects outweigh any imaginable good effects.
Click to expand...

How can you possibly state that? No research has been done into the possible medical benefits of substituted cathinones. If it weren't for the constant re-evaluation of cannabis, there would be no proof of its medical properties. There is also no proof that synthetic cannabinoids have any benefit. Their medical status is exactly the same.

As I'm sure you're aware, cancer is a pretty deadly class of illness in its own right, necessitating risky treatments. Almost every treatment for every kind of cancer carries a risk of death. You are far more likely to die from radiation treatment, chemotherapy, anti-oestrogen therapy etc. than from mephedrone - so if somehow one of them, for example, was shown to induce cell death in pancreatic cancer cells (to pick any random anti-cancer property), the benefits would certainly outweigh the risks.

But because of attitudes like yours, we will never know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top