mal3volent
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 40,019
Congrats my fellow European 



The "GC" which makes me think of Gemma Collins in a horrific way doesn't look like his coming back after his last post but I'll not comment upon his use & quality of posts on this forum as my views are well known.@Zopiclone bandit all you need to do is not engage with ganjcat and not make personal insults to anyone and you're fine.
What I learned you are quite welcome to join us, chances are you got more Irish, Dutch or Scottish in you than most other Americans.Congrats my fellow European![]()
thankfully the BLUA doesn't apply to public figures so i can call him a lying fucking charlatan with blood on his hands, willing to let people die so that he can cash in on quack covid cures. i highly recommend you 'follow the money' for Malone and see how much you trust him when you find out how much of a financial interest he has in undermining covid vaccine uptake.I will hold you to that post the next time I have to raise Dr Robert Malone![]()
![]()
I've long regarded you as..................erm yeah you can figure it outthankfully the BLUA doesn't apply to public figures so i can call him a lying fucking charlatan with blood on his hands, willing to let people die so that he can cash in on quack covid cures. i highly recommend you 'follow the money' for Malone and see how much you trust him when you find out how much of a financial interest he has in undermining covid vaccine uptake.
he's so fucking beyond credibility. like i actually listened to some of his Joe Rogan interview. it fucking hurt. he was making such unbelievable glaring scientific errors, and he IS a scientist, so he almsot certainly knows he is lying. but Joe Rogan doesn't have a sufficient background to pull him up on his lies, and apparently most of his audience don't know or don't care. small example- non specific PCR. you can actually do non-specific PCR for metagenomic samples using random hexamers (or, pick your own length, you might do better with longer but this is what my lab uses), but the primers used for COVID detection have been published, its easy to verify that they are specific. further, the sensitivity and specificity of the COVID PCR tests have been validated using independent means such as LAMP, clinical data, etc. nobody who makes this types of error should be considered a reputable source.
anybody with some basic biology knowledge (i just type so this is how i consider myself) can rip him apart in minutes.
i'd really appreciate it if the bullshit wasn't so boring and easy to debunk, something creative and more convincing would be more fun to pull to shreads.
BUT I'm a fair man, I'm starting to get the feeling even though your human skills in reading people ain't that sharp hence why you fail to know when I'm joking & taking the piss & I actually mean what I say (which for some reason FUBAR can do very well)
I was under the impression that a Polmerase chain reaction wasnt really a test at all but a mechanism in which genetic material could be multiplied many times to produce more in a sample...thankfully the BLUA doesn't apply to public figures so i can call him a lying fucking charlatan with blood on his hands, willing to let people die so that he can cash in on quack covid cures. i highly recommend you 'follow the money' for Malone and see how much you trust him when you find out how much of a financial interest he has in undermining covid vaccine uptake.
he's so fucking beyond credibility. like i actually listened to some of his Joe Rogan interview. it fucking hurt. he was making such unbelievable glaring scientific errors, and he IS a scientist, so he almsot certainly knows he is lying. but Joe Rogan doesn't have a sufficient background to pull him up on his lies, and apparently most of his audience don't know or don't care. small example- non specific PCR. you can actually do non-specific PCR for metagenomic samples using random hexamers (or, pick your own length, you might do better with longer but this is what my lab uses), but the primers used for COVID detection have been published, its easy to verify that they are specific. further, the sensitivity and specificity of the COVID PCR tests have been validated using independent means such as LAMP, clinical data, etc. nobody who makes this types of error should be considered a reputable source.
anybody with some basic biology knowledge (i just type so this is how i consider myself) can rip him apart in minutes.
i'd really appreciate it if the bullshit wasn't so boring and easy to debunk, something creative and more convincing would be more fun to pull to shreads.
Which one will thou be grinding?This is a man who will be bringing an axe to a knife fight
gz
when used for diagnostic purposes, polymerase chain reactions are used to amplify genetic material in specific regions determined by the primers you use- essentially bits of DNA that target specific regions, for a test like the COVID tests, these would be genomic regions unique to the SARS-COV2 genome. these amplified regions of DNA can then be sequenced for variant calling, or if you just want to know presence/absence of SARS-COV2 you can use a chemical that produces fluorescense if it is present.I was under the impression that a Polmerase chain reaction wasnt really a test at all but a mechanism in which genetic material could be multiplied many times to produce more in a sample...
Thanks so much fo all the warm welcomes you lovely bunch of druggy deviants!
I'll be keeping my mod axe sharp enough to shave with though, incase any of you fuckers step out of line! Oh and PM me and I'll send you my new-mod gift list (think of a wedding gift list but consisting of lovely lovely drugs!) It's a really .ñ
bites tongueFinally somebody who isn't mentally ill
thankfully the BLUA doesn't apply to public figures so i can call him a lying fucking charlatan with blood on his hands, willing to let people die so that he can cash in on quack covid cures. i highly recommend you 'follow the money' for Malone and see how much you trust him when you find out how much of a financial interest he has in undermining covid vaccine uptake.
he's so fucking beyond credibility. like i actually listened to some of his Joe Rogan interview. it fucking hurt. he was making such unbelievable glaring scientific errors, and he IS a scientist, so he almsot certainly knows he is lying. but Joe Rogan doesn't have a sufficient background to pull him up on his lies, and apparently most of his audience don't know or don't care. small example- non specific PCR. you can actually do non-specific PCR for metagenomic samples using random hexamers (or, pick your own length, you might do better with longer but this is what my lab uses), but the primers used for COVID detection have been published, its easy to verify that they are specific. further, the sensitivity and specificity of the COVID PCR tests have been validated using independent means such as LAMP, clinical data, etc. nobody who makes this types of error should be considered a reputable source.
anybody with some basic biology knowledge (i just type so this is how i consider myself) can rip him apart in minutes.
i'd really appreciate it if the bullshit wasn't so boring and easy to debunk, something creative and more convincing would be more fun to pull to shreads.