plazma
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2001
- Messages
- 4,992
MazDan said:My disinterest stems from the fact that i am an intelligent human being and hence i am able to discern that i cannot possibly understand all the ins and outs without being fully in the know.
The best i could do would be to appear like i knew everything and then put shit on anyone who is actually in a position to do something who actually does have an idea of all the ins and outs
However I choose not to do that as I am intelligent enough to realise that all that achieves is nothing...........nothing at all.
So, I'm trying to follow your reasoning here. You justify disinterest by knowing that you ARE intelligent enough to grasp some of the situation, but because you as one human being can't know EVERYTHING there is to know about any given situation, you reduce yourself to passivity. Now THAT seems nonsensical.
MazDan said:If you truly believe that what is happenning is not in our best interests, then I suggest you.........
1.Learn ALL there is to know, rather an impossibility without being in the right positions, I will admit.
Yeah we already established this one. But I should tell you that I think that your way of viewing the attaining as much of this knowledge as possible, just being a route to pressuring the people 'who know', is a bit disempowering.
MazDan said:2. Dont believe everything you read in newspapers........personally having been in the game, I have learnt to appreciate the brilliant ramblings of a journo who has the ability to twist anything to make it appear something totally different without actually dramatically changing the facts.
What, I believe everything I read in the Australian, and the Daily Telegraph. That's why I SUPPORT this legislation.
Thank you though, unfacetiously, for reminding us of this cardinal rule of skeptical intelligence, read everything you can, but do not believe everything you read.
MazDan said:3. Start working to get yourself into a position where you can make a difference and help to make our society a happier and safer one for all to live in.
Okay. I'll get right onto that one. But is it okay to want to make the world a little happier and safer, instead of just one society, given that's kind of the basis of the whole problem anyway?
-plaz out-