Australia: Alcohol is destroying us

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Alcohol is destroying us: Four Australians share their stories

087905-e7ef83b2-28e3-11e4-aaf4-d11cdeb5504d.jpg


LIKES a drink, or drinks too much? Whether it’s an indifferent attitude to the excess consumption of alcohol, or our ignorance when it comes to the effect it has on our bodies, Australia’s most socially accepted drug is indeed destroying lives.
The newly-released Alcohol’s Burden of Disease in Australia report found that alcohol is responsible for 15 deaths every day. That’s a 60 per cent increase from a decade ago. In addition to this, another 430 people are admitted to hospital for treatment for alcohol-related injuries or disease every day.

If you are surprised by these statistics, you’re not alone.
“The Australian medical profession is profoundly concerned that the harms of alcohol are getting worse — domestic violence, depression, deaths from trauma, obesity — the list goes on,” Dr Stephen Parnis, Emergency Physician and Vice President of the AMA tells news.com.au.

“It is time to deal with this epidemic, and denial will only allow it to get worse. The evidence of harm is absolutely conclusive.”
Indeed, the latest Cancer Report from the World Health Organisation found that while 8.2 million people died from cancer globally in 2012, 3.7 million of those deaths could have been avoided by “lifestyle changes”, including limiting alcohol.
“About 5 per cent of all cancer is due to alcohol consumption — that’s an important part of the preventable cancer story,” the Cancer Council Australia’s Terry Slevin said at the time. “Let’s make no bones about it: alcohol is a class one known carcinogen, it’s listed by the World Health Organisation as such.”

But the affect alcohol can have on an individual’s health is only part of the story. In 2012, the Salvation Army commissioned research as part of Alcohol Awareness week into the effect alcohol abuse has on families. Among many worrisome findings, they revealed that 4.2 million Australians know families where they think children are not being properly cared for because of someone’s alcohol abuse. Add this to the fact that almost half of all domestic homicides are alcohol related, and that the proportion of people experiencing physical abuse by someone under the influence of alcohol increased from 1.5 million in 2010 to 1.7 million in 2013, and you’ve got yourself a worrying epidemic.
News.com.au spoke to four people whose lives have all been affected by alcohol in different ways. When we asked each of them if they thought the Australian public were aware of just how damaging alcohol can be, the answer was a resounding ‘No’.
“Alcohol is such a huge part of the Australian culture, drinking at every social gathering is just widely accepted as ‘normal’,” Rebecca Wheller told us. “I think it’s only when we take an extended break from drinking that we realise just how damaging and unnecessary it really is.”

“A lot of people are shocked when they find out the reason that I don’t drink is because I’m a recovering alcoholic,” adds 33-year-old Emma Fahy Davis. “But the truth is, you don’t have to be an alcoholic to have a problem with alcohol. If your drinking impacts on other areas of your life, you’ve got a problem.”
Here’s how alcohol has changed four Australian lives …

WHEN YOUR FATHER’S AN ALCOHOLIC: Finn, blogger at throughthickandfinn.com

I’d say I have a somewhat conflicted experience and relationship with alcohol. This is because while I socially drink in moderation, and don’t yet intend on giving up, I also grew up with an alcoholic father who was more than a stool-perched, beer-drinking alcoholic.

Growing up with his alcoholism involved police visits to the family home, crisis teams for attempted suicides and often myself and other family members leaving the house to stay elsewhere in the hope to just get away from the drama caused by the erratic behaviour. It also resulted in me developing personality traits that are characteristically common when growing up in with any addicted person or in a dysfunctional environment. These traits, such as perfectionism, feeling ‘different’ from other people, people-pleasing, an inability to ‘follow through’ and being hyper-vigilant, meant I wasn’t just left with the grief and anger around the loss of a parent.

I got pretty quickly things were different in our family compared to others, but I was also lucky because my mother spoke openly about the problems. I know a lot of families exist in the shame or it becomes the “elephant in the room”, and I am grateful I didn’t have to deal with that added burden of not being able to share my problems. Having said that, at a young age you don’t really sit around talking with primary school friends about the problems at home and I just knew that our family life was stressful compared to other friends’ homes.

I would say I performed fairly well at school, but the problems at home always outweighed my concern for my grades. Quite frankly, surviving emotionally becomes a higher priority than worrying about what you’re learning in English class. Socially I was healthy and had many friends, but I always had the characteristic of being “the responsible one” and not easily being able to let go and have fun. This still manages to be a problem and I do take life pretty seriously. I am always waiting for something terrible to happen and I always think forewarned is forearmed, but it’s tiring being that way.

As a teenager I would often wonder if I would grow up and be an alcoholic, because there were times where — like most young teenagers or young adults do — I drank too much. However, as I got into my mid-twenties I realised I didn’t feel the compulsion to keep drinking and I could stop when I knew I should, which alcoholics — like my father — find virtually impossible to do.

Alcohol, at its worst, disintegrated my family before my very eyes. I’ve often looked back and thought, “how did it get to this?”: immediate and extended family members all estranged and not in relationships with each other, the breakdown of my parent’s marriage, the decaying of my father’s health, and my sibling and I left with psychological issues; such as panic attacks, generalised anxiety and, at various times, deep depression.

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/he...re-their-stories/story-fneuzlbd-1227032066650
 
Meh.

A different perspective:

http://www.bluelight.org/vb/threads...stralia’s-alcohol-consumption?highlight=keane

Statement: drinking more than two standard drinks a day is “risky drinking” and you should avoid alcohol altogether

Herein lies a tale. Most people will recall the National Health and Medical Research Council 2009 revision of its alcohol guidelines, when it rather spectacularly jumped the shark by deciding to amend its recommendation of four standard drinks a day for men and two for women to two a day for everyone.

What’s less understood is exactly what the basis for the NHMRC’s recommendation is. It’s based on lifetime risk assessment: how likely are you to die from anything alcohol-related at a certain level of consumption. Anything  — dying while driving drunk, getting into a drunken fight, or eventually dying from an alcohol-related disease. And the basis for the two drink a day recommendation is 0.9% for men — as in, less than 1% of people consuming two drinks a day will die from an alcohol-related cause at some point.

And if you don’t drink-drive, and you don’t get into fights when you drink, then the risk is halved. The risk is 0.4% for alcohol-related diseases for men and women at two standard drinks a day. The risk increases the more you drink, obviously — thus the phrase “risky drinking”. But how “risky”? You have to drink eight drinks a day in order to get over 5% risk of alcohol-related disease if you’re a male, and over five drinks a day if you’re a woman.

To put that into context, as the NHMRC itself notes, “the lifetime risk of dying in a traffic accident associated with driving 10,000 miles a year in the US has been calculated to be about one in 60,” or about 1.7%.

But, say you wanted to live a risk-free life. Say four people in 1000 wasn’t good enough odds for you. Why not just not drink? That’s what bodies like the Cancer Council recommend.

Well, if you don’t drink, you miss out on the health benefits of alcohol, particularly if you’re older: as the NHMRC explains in its guidelines, light to moderate drinking (up to two standard drinks) has been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk, improve bone density and, perhaps, protect against dementia.

Some preventive health industry figures claim these benefits are “contested” but currently there are no substantiated, up-to-date studies that have disputed the long history of studies demonstrating health benefits from moderate alcohol consumption.

“Let’s make no bones about it: alcohol is a class one known carcinogen, it’s listed by the World Health Organisation as such.”

Yeah but... From a RELEVANT risk assessment perspective, 1:2 people are going to get cancer anyway so if there's a 5% chance that's caused by alcohol (or, rather, the long-term chronic use of alcohol) then I say a big MEH to the wowsers. You can prise the beer from my cold, dead fingers but in the meantime the wowser lobby can fuck right off. Alcohol isn't like tobacco, which actually kills 1:2 of long term users, for the most part it's relatively benign and actually has a lot of positive benefits - including health benefits. If you look at it from a risk assessment perspective then compared to say, sitting for 6 hours a day, then, hell, I'd prefer to be drunk than worrying that my 1:2 chance of getting cancer might be the result of drinking. Meh. Meh. MEH.
 
Ethanol consumption in any amount is carcinogenic.

It is also neurotoxic, cardiotoxic, and hepatotoxic in large amounts - or in other words, in amounts typically required to get smashed.

Every 10 seconds, there is a death on this planet which is related to alcohol consumption.

If there is such thing as a gateway drug, I'd pick ethanol over marijuana any day of the week, as it has always resulted in reckless, abnormal drug seeking behavior in myself.

Drunk driving, domestic abuse, irrational violence, dangerous behavior, vandalism and destruction of property, countless bar fights over nothing, vomiting in my car and home, hangovers - just a few examples of the joys of dealing with alcohol intoxication.

Whatever blood-thinning (and other cardiovascular) health benefits that one glass of wine with dinner, or a couple of beers with lunch may have is contradicted by the fact that it increases the chances of the consumer developing cancer.

Why is any of this even relevant?

Based on my own personal experience, and the experiences of friends, family members, relatives, and acquaintances, I can think of a few reasons, such as the fact that:

- In over 100 nations around the world, television commercials for alcoholic beverages are increasingly commonplace. And the risks are usually consolidated into a barely noticeable, vague sentence such as, "Drink Responsibly."

- In over 100 nations around the world, newspaper and/or magazine advertisements for alcoholic beverages are increasingly commonplace. And the risks are usually consolidated in the same manner as with television commercials.

- Getting drunk in public typically does not result in the type of reaction which is warranted in such circumstances. In contrast, getting drunk (especially when young) is viewed as acceptable behavior by the majority of the population, and most people will feel safer around a drunk individual when compared to someone who is high due to the use of (for example) marijuana, MDMA, and opioids. Ironically, chances are that the most unpredictable, violent, intoxicated person is actually the one who is drunk. It shows how hoodwinked society has become when it comes to recreational drug use.

- When purchasing alcoholic beverages, other than a "Drink Responsibly" sticker, I have never come across a product which states the fact that alcohol is toxic in large amounts to several vital organs, causes countless deaths due to drunk driving, is carcinogenic in any amount, is addictive, causes physical dependency in heavy users, is considered a medical emergency when in withdrawal from it (as it can lead to death without treatment), and so forth. From a harm reduction standpoint, this is very wrong if you're trying to convey the message that certain recreational drugs are either controlled or illegal because of health concerns.

- When receiving emergency treatment for alcohol poisoning, or when a discussion revolves around the patient enjoying getting drunk, most healthcare professionals will not consider that person to be a junkie in the same manner as someone who uses (for example) marijuana instead. The term "drug abuser" usually doesn't apply to binge drinkers, yet it does to someone who decides to try some MDMA one time and reports it to his or her doctor.

- Deaths due to alcohol consumption are rarely (if ever) reported in the media, yet every so often, the odd death due to the use of adulterated MDMA prompts a shitstorm of biased coverage and stigmatization of a drug which, in its pure form and with proper harm reduction measures taken, is no more risky than booze.

------------------------------------------------------------

Regardless of what I just wrote above, I'll gladly be the first one to acknowledge that I have consumed "too many" drinks in the past 3 decades. And I became irrationally violent at times, extremely reckless on countless occasions by way of mixing booze with other drugs, or, engaging in sexual activity with strangers (seemed like a good idea at the time).

Due to my desire to get smashed on a regular basis, I was a burden on the healthcare system, I broke a lot of hearts for no reason other than to satisfy my own selfish desires, and I treated my body like an amusement park which nearly ended up with me six feet under a few times (had to get my stomach pumped twice, and so forth).

I stopped touching booze back in 2009, and haven't had a sip since, as I simply can't control myself when under the influence of ethanol. I viciously and recklessly engage in drug seeking behavior when drunk - usually looking for some quality blow. I smoke like a chimney. I spend a lot of money. Bla bla bla...

If other people wish to consume alcoholic beverages, well then cheers mate!

My problem with booze is political in nature, and not moral.

I have a big problem with the fact that the government in this country, and other countries are content to let the show continue, yet have the nerve to preach about "drug abuse," and to ruin the lives of "drug abusers" because they happen to prefer something other than booze or tobacco in order to "take the edge off." Any way you cut it, these cockroaches are hypocrites. And what do they expect? Like everything else in life, everybody's different, everybody has their own tastes and preferences, and as such, it's perfectly logical to assume that we all prefer different highs, so why are some of us subject to prosecution when the others aren't? It just doesn't make any sense - which is part of the reason why many people think this war on drugs is a joke, and they refuse to get with the program, so to speak.

I have a big problem with the fact that the media chooses to ignore alcohol-related tragedies, but do not do so with other drugs. Not to sound like Captain Obvious, but it stinks of a biased, hidden agenda.

I have a massive issue with bureaucrats who prey on whomever they can in order to seize their property because that person was found with parts of a plant in his pockets. At the same time, rape test kits are collecting dust in some police department cellar because there's no money to be made in solving actual crimes.

I have a huge fucking problem with drug prohibitionists who crusade to maintain the status quo, however choose to look the other way when it comes to booze and/or tobacco (possibly because it suits their own addictions to either alcohol or nicotine).

I have absolutely no problem with someone who likes to consume alcoholic beverages and/or tobacco/nicotine products, but doesn't like to consume controlled substances, but also does not go about condemning the minority of us who do.

Edit - For what it's worth, my opinion is weak in the context of my ability to solely influence these matters, and is not required for you to enjoy yourself, so please don't take it personally.

Sorry about the rant, didn't mean to point the finger at anyone in particular. It's just frustrating that this is the way it is, that's all. Frustrating that people are rotting in prison because they don't enjoy alcohol but do enjoy marijuana, MDMA, opioids, etc. Frustrating that politicians sit on their asses while otherwise law-abiding men and women have their lives ruined because of a plant, powder, or pill. It's about as intelligent as two grown men ruining the lives of those around them over a woman (or vice versa).
 
Last edited:
I've always thought they should legalize GHB and offer it as a safer booze replacement. Of course it's still a harmful and dangerous drug, but as far as I know it doesn't do nearly as much organ damage as alcohol does.

iirc. David Nutt recommended something similar a while back (not with GHB specifically, but with finding a healthier replacement for alcohol).
 
Sorry about the rant, didn't mean to point the finger at anyone in particular. It's just frustrating that this is the way it is, that's all. Frustrating that people are rotting in prison because they don't enjoy alcohol but do enjoy marijuana, MDMA, opioids, etc. Frustrating that politicians sit on their asses while otherwise law-abiding men and women have their lives ruined because of a plant, powder, or pill. It's about as intelligent as two grown men ruining the lives of those around them over a woman (or vice versa).

No, it was a good rant - there's little to disagree with in it. I share your distaste for the double standards on illegal drugs and alcohol, my gripe is with the wowser lobby that would deny people their right to take risks and (in Aus at least) have made the last bastion of legal recreation - alcohol - so prohibitively expensive that it's beyond ridiculous.
 
i dont drink any more. only thing i enjoyed about alcohol was its synergy with tobacco, and i dont smoke anymore..

i guess as society becomes more shit, there is a correlation with people bottling up all their emotions and sorrow -> drinking to excess

i reckon legalising weed is a better alternative than GHB, but idk what G would be like if it was diluted properly, i guess the overdose potential is not too far off ethanol
 
i reckon legalising weed is a better alternative than GHB, but idk what G would be like if it was diluted properly, i guess the overdose potential is not too far off ethanol

Weed isn't a replacement for booze, they're completely different types of drugs, there are plenty of people who drink but don't enjoy weed.
 
thats a good point, but i think it would have some dent in the amount of people that drink all the time, because they ultimately are trying to escape from their thoughts and/or have a good time, and weed can provide both of those things, and munchies at 1am would taste waaay better
 
Top