Aus - Silk Road - BROTHERS IN COURT OVER ONLINE DRUGS

Semantics. The "harm" that is in the purview of Bluelight is harm from substances and their administration, not from LE.

I'm not saying that LE isn't harmful, only that that's a different type of harm.
 
but we (including mods) routinely advise people to be wary of LE - while there's clearly a line that, for the site's sake, must be acknowledged, it doesn't mean we should / have to just ignore LE.

saying "many sellers on silk road are suspected LE", or "shipping pot overseas is riskier than pills" isn't remotely the same thing as "user:dklafjdokfj on site:dkfljdkfjd has killer:dljkfdfjd on sale right now".

/if disagreed upon, how can we have threads on upcoming stings? (see thread warning about newer "web tryp"-type sting from several weeks ago)
//clearly this sucks for you being in the mod spot because it's a complete PITA, but it's within bl's purview and, more importantly, it is what's *right*.
 
Who are you bmxxx and who are you representing? Are you a poster, a mod, a site owner, investor, concerned individual? I don't see anything to say that you have a role apart from Bluelighter.


What is with this kind of talk:

but we (including mods) routinely advise people to be wary of LE - while there's clearly a line that, for the site's sake, must be acknowledged, it doesn't mean we should / have to just ignore LE.
Click to expand...

It sounds like you are some kind of messiah.
 
i have zero personal stakes in any particular sites, but i definitely fall closer to the extreme ideologically where prohibition is concerned (as any ethical drug user should).
I used to moderate CEP on this board under a different username, but that's really got zero relevance to this ;P
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top