As 3 states mull marijuana legalization, experts warn: 'Beware'

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
WASHINGTON -- Legalizing marijuana in even a single state could drive down prices dramatically across the country, encouraging more people to smoke the drug, a panel of experts said at a briefing Tuesday.

Last week, Oregon became the third state that will vote this November on a ballot measure to legalize marijuana, joining Colorado and Washington.

“Legalization is unprecedented – not even the Netherlands has done it – it is entirely possible it will happen this year,” said Jonathan Caulkins, co-author of "Marijuana Legalization: What Everyone Needs to Know."

“The effects will be enormous,” said Caulkins, a professor at Carnegie Mellon, during an event at the American Enterprise Institute.

The Obama administration opposes legalizing marijuana and has taken action to shut down some medical marijuana dispensaries in California and Colorado.

Caulkins said one of the main reasons for outlawing the drug is to make it riskier to produce and sell, driving up prices and curbing use. A price collapse following legalization in some states could undermine marijuana laws nationally, the experts warned.

Caulkins said Colorado’s proposition would allow residents to obtain a grower’s license fairly easily, making the state a good home for exporters of marijuana.

“They would be able to provide marijuana to New York state markets at one quarter of the current price,” he said, predicting similar price declines in other states.

Mark Kleiman, a professor of public policy at UCLA, said his advice to federal officials would be “to sit down with the governor of the state and say, 'Look, we can make your life completely miserable -- and we will - unless you figure out a way to avoid the exports.”

One option would be to impose strict limits on how much of the drug retailers could sell to each customer.

Washington’s proposal would present authorities with a different problem. The state is proposing to create a strong system of regulations with the aim of propping up prices. Caulkins said the federal government could strike down the regulations but would leave a free-for-all behind.

“The federal government will face some really difficult choices where actions are like double-edged swords,” Caulkins said.


http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/...a-legalization-panel-20120717,0,4151581.story
 
you know what is sad? every anti-cannabis person will frantically go around "warning" everyone about this or that that is going to go wrong with cannabis. The funny part is whatever they are going on about changes every time they have a debate. They go through so many different arguments. The best part is that the pro-cannabis lobby has had the same arguments since cannabis was made illegal. Usually when someone makes the same argument over and over and their opponent has to keep switching arguments it means that the consistent debater is right.
 
true that zeke.

cannabis laws are outrageous imo people are going to use cannabis regardless. they could also be paying attention to drugs with higher risks instead of wasting money busting people for cannabis. also if cannabis is cheaper that should be good more people will be turning onto cannabis instead of other highs.
 
So, is the concern that marijuana legalization in a single state would encourage residents of that state to grow and sell their products over state lines? Certainly there would be laws to prohibit such behavior (should legalization ever occur), as with alcohol. Marijuana legalization doesn't need to be a "free-for-all", it's a potentially successful industry that would only require a little government regulation and oversight (just like any other marketable enterprise) to prevent any illegal/unethical practices. With the enormous amount of law enforcement resources freed from prosecuting low-level drug violations, greater effort could be put towards punishing those who have committed more serious crimes.
 
you know what is sad? every anti-cannabis person will frantically go around "warning" everyone about this or that that is going to go wrong with cannabis. The funny part is whatever they are going on about changes every time they have a debate. They go through so many different arguments. The best part is that the pro-cannabis lobby has had the same arguments since cannabis was made illegal. Usually when someone makes the same argument over and over and their opponent has to keep switching arguments it means that the consistent debater is right.

or it could mean one side is playing a one string banjo. it really depends on what perspective you look from
 
people don't smoke pot because its cheap, generally. They smoke because they like it!
IF pot was cheaper I'd probably buy more but I'd smoke the same amount. I'd just have to buy it less frequently

apologies for my ignorance on how tax law works...
But would this open states up to harassment via taxes? Like when dispensaries are denied certain tax exemptions because their business deals with (federally illegal) drug trade
I'm not sure if a state as a whole has similar tax situations.
 
Top