ForEverAfter
Ex-Bluelighter
Nobel Prize winners, for Physics:
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/
With respect, you have no idea what you're talking about. He's not an idiot. I said he's a bit of an idiot, in relation to the statement I quoted. Maybe we could discuss the quote, rather than you just disagreeing with me. Or, perhaps, you should look into why he doesn't qualify as a candidate for the Nobel prize. His most significant "discovery" is Hawking radiation, which is not "the most important contribution to modern theoretical physics and quantum mechanics"... He is not, in the scientific community, regarded as "the most important contributor" to any field... I think you're just assuming that (no offense intended) because of your relative unfamiliarity with modern physics coupled with his significant celebrity exposure.
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/
The claim that Hawkings is 'an idiot', 'doesn't know what he is talking about', and wouldnt be considered as the most imprtant contributor to modern theoretical physics and quantum mechanics are absurd.
With respect, you have no idea what you're talking about. He's not an idiot. I said he's a bit of an idiot, in relation to the statement I quoted. Maybe we could discuss the quote, rather than you just disagreeing with me. Or, perhaps, you should look into why he doesn't qualify as a candidate for the Nobel prize. His most significant "discovery" is Hawking radiation, which is not "the most important contribution to modern theoretical physics and quantum mechanics"... He is not, in the scientific community, regarded as "the most important contributor" to any field... I think you're just assuming that (no offense intended) because of your relative unfamiliarity with modern physics coupled with his significant celebrity exposure.
Last edited: