(Analog) ban on GBL, Cannabinoids, Piperazines, other legal highs

WeedMyLips

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
151
Location
The land of the long white cloud
UK ban on GBL, Cannabanoids and other Legal Highs to go in effect December 23rd 2009

Draft Order laid before Parliament under section 2(5) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, for approval by resolution of each House of Parliament.

DRAFT STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS

2009 No.

DANGEROUS DRUGS

The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2009

Made***
Coming into force 23rd December 2009

At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the *** day of ***
Present,
The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council

In accordance with section 2(5) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971(1) a draft of this Order has been laid before Parliament after consultation with the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.

Accordingly, Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred upon Her by section 2(2) of that Act, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order as follows:

Citation and commencement
1. This Order may be cited as the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2009 and shall come into force on 23rd December 2009.
Amendments to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

2.—(1) Schedule 2 to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (which specifies the drugs which are subject to control under that Act) is amended as follows.
(2) In Part 2 (Class B drugs)—
(a)after paragraph 1(b), insert—
“(c)

[2,3–Dihydro–5–methyl–3–(4–morpholinylmethyl)pyrrol o[1, 2, 3–de]–1,4–benzoxazin–6–yl]–1–naphthalenylmethanone.3–Dimethylheptyl–11–hydro xyhexahydrocannabinol.
[9–Hydroxy–6–methyl–3–[5–phenylpentan–2–yl] oxy–5, 6, 6a, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10a–octahydrophenanthridin–1–yl] acetate.
9-(Hydroxymethyl)–6, 6–dimethyl–3–(2–methyloctan–2–yl)–6a, 7, 10, 10a–tetrahydrobenzo[c]chromen–1–ol.Nabilone.
Any compound structurally derived from 3–(1–naphthoyl)indole or 1H–indol–3–yl–(1–naphthyl)methane by substitution at the nitrogen atom of the indole ring by alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkylmethyl, cycloalkylethyl or 2–(4–morpholinyl)ethyl, whether or not further substituted in the indole ring to any extent and whether or not substituted in the naphthyl ring to any extent.Any compound structurally derived from 3–(1–naphthoyl)pyrrole by substitution at the nitrogen atom of the pyrrole ring by alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkylmethyl, cycloalkylethyl or 2–(4–morpholinyl)ethyl, whether or not further substituted in the pyrrole ring to any extent and whether or not substituted in the naphthyl ring to any extent.
Any compound structurally derived from 1–(1–naphthylmethyl)indene by substitution at the 3–position of the indene ring by alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkylmethyl, cycloalkylethyl or 2–(4–morpholinyl)ethyl, whether or not further substituted in the indene ring to any extent and whether or not substituted in the naphthyl ring to any extent.
Any compound structurally derived from 3–phenylacetylindole by substitution at the nitrogen atom of the indole ring with alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkylmethyl, cycloalkylethyl or 2–(4–morpholinyl)ethyl, whether or not further substituted in the indole ring to any extent and whether or not substituted in the phenyl ring to any extent.
Any compound structurally derived from 2–(3–hydroxycyclohexyl)phenol by substitution at the 5–position of the phenolic ring by alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkylmethyl, cycloalkylethyl or 2–(4–morpholinyl)ethyl, whether or not further substituted in the cyclohexyl ring to any extent.”;

(b)in paragraph 2A, after “derivative” insert “or of a substance for the time being specified in paragraph 1(c) of this Part of this Schedule.”.

(3) In Part 3 (Class C drugs)—

(a)in paragraph 1(a), after “Flurazepam”, insert “Gamma–butyrolactone”;

(b)in paragraph 1(b)—

(i)before “4–Androstene–3,17–dione”, insert—“5α–Androstane–3,17–diol.Androst-4-ene-3,17-diol.1–Androstenediol.1–Androstenedione”;
(ii)after “4–Androstene–3,17–dione”, insert “5–Androstenedione.”;
(iii)after “Boldenone.”, insert “Boldione.”;
(iv)after “Bolmantalate.”, insert “1,4–Butanediol.”;
(v)after “Clostebol.”, insert—“Danazol.Desoxymethyltestosterone”;
(vi)after “Furazabol.”, insert—“Gestrinone.3–Hydroxy–5α–androstan–17–one.” ;
(vii)after “Nandrolone.”, insert “19–Norandrostenedione.”;
(viii)after “19–Nor–5–Androstene–3,17–diol”, insert “19–Norandrosterone.”;
(ix)after “Norethandrolone.”, insert—“19–Noretiocholanolone.Oripavine.”;
(x)after “Propetandrol.”, insert “Prostanozol.”;
(xi)after “Testosterone.”, insert “Tetrahydrogestrinone.”;
(c)after paragraph 1(c), insert—
“(ca)1–benzylpiperazine or any compound structurally derived from 1–benzylpiperazine or 1–phenylpiperazine by modification in any of the following ways—
(i)by substitution at the second nitrogen atom of the piperazine ring with alkyl, benzyl, haloalkyl or phenyl groups;
(ii)by substitution in the aromatic ring to any extent with alkyl, alkoxy, alkylenedioxy, halide or haloalkyl groups.”;
(d)in paragraph 1(e), after “Somatropin.”, insert “Zeranol.” and “Zilpaterol.”.

Judith SimpsonClerk of the Privy Council
(1)1971 (c. 38). Schedule 2 has been amended by section 21 of the Drugs Act 2005 (c. 17) and S.I. 1973/771, 1975/421, 1977/1243, 1979/299, 1983/765, 1984/859, 1985/1995, 1986/2230, 1989/1340, 1990/2589, 1995/1966, 1996/1300, 1998/750, 2001/3932, 2003/1243, 2003/3201, 2005/3178, 2006/3331 and 2008/3130. Back [1]

EXPLANATORY NOTE
(This note is not part of the Order)

This Order adds synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists to Part 2 of Schedule 2 to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (“the Act”) which specifies drugs which are subject to control as Class B drugs under the Act.

In addition, the Order adds Gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), 1,4–butanediol (1,4–BD), 15 anabolic steroids, two non-steroidal agents, Oripavine, 1–benzylpiperazine (BZP) and a group of substituted piperazines to Part 3 of Schedule 2 to the Act which specifies drugs which are subject to control as Class C drugs under the Act.
 
I thought they were supposed to use science and other medical information before being able to classify as being harmful, and being locked away under a schedule
 
Thanks for the post, but there is no link with this article...
 
you dont need science to show how awful pipez are..... arrrrggg

scientist.jpg


"Our preliminary analysis seems to indicate that these rolls are some bunk-ass shit."
 
^ That last line made LOL hard Roger, Thanks :D

I wish Canada would get on this piperazine banning bandwagon. Our government is actually pretty oblivious when it comes to drugs. :\

I think it's because "legal highs" haven't really taken off here. People still seem to like their coke, meth and piperazine pills. You wouldn't believe how many people I know who buy those pills and swallow them like candy thinking that they're good and going back to buy more.

They've never had a good pill in their life, have even heard or MDMA or know what it is. Come to think of it; there's a LOT of really stupid drug users in my country. The only people I know who know what MDMA is, know what it is because I told them.

We really need proper drug education in our schools.
 
Last edited:
^ That last line made LOL hard Roger, Thanks :D

I wish Canada would get on this piperazine banning bandwagon. Our government is actually pretty oblivious when it comes to drugs. :\

I think it's because "legal highs" haven't really taken off here. People still seem to like their coke, meth and piperazine pills. You wouldn't believe how many people I know who buy those pills and swallow them like candy thinking that they're good and going back to buy more.

They've never had a good pill in their life, have even heard or MDMA or know what it is. Come to think of it; there's a LOT of really stupid drug users in my country. The only people I know who know what MDMA is, know what it is because I told them.

We really need proper drug education in our schools.

WTF? how can ppl not know what MDMA is?
 
By being very uneducated about drugs and not reading a single thing about them.

I'd bet less than 5% of people who take E pills (which are all piperazines; an E pill is an E pill to them, they don't think about the ingredients) know what MDMA is or have heard of it.

People are very dumb about drugs around here. They get all their information by word of mouth and urban legends. :|
 
So, just to condense the article:-

Will this affect 4-methylmethcathinone or 3,4-dimethoxymethcathinone?

Sorry, too tired to read the text in full.
 
Agree on GBL.

Cannot comment on the Piperazines, since I have never used these.
 
GBL and GHB are effective hypnotics when used responsibly- why ban? Pipes will be class C so although I wish "E" would return to late-80s style disco biscuits with huge guaranteed MDMA doses and no junk, this is unlikely. People selling pills as ecstasy can be charged with conspiracy to class A anyway and if it comes down to chemical composition, dealers can expect much lighter sentences for piperazines than phenethylamines.
 
In my experience GHB is indeed a very effective hynotic.

But it is seriously contraindicated with alcohol and this is endemic in the UK. It seems most recreational users will use both at the same time, even if the alcohol use is small.... GHB / GBL being sold as liquid to non-experienced people?

Tabloid Press....

Myself, at home - well I'wouldn't want to be outside....

I ended up disposing of 1/2 litre of GBL after two uses with a bit of alcohol.
 
Last edited:
Top