All over the US, police are robbing innocent drivers

...

Bluelighter
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
485
Location
The Circle of Willis
Multiple page article: http://www.stwnewspress.com/cnhi_network/article_daf14bbf-a3d4-51cb-9013-73b55f00edd7.html

Mandrel Stuart and his girlfriend were on a date driving on Interstate 66 toward the District of Columbia when a Fairfax County, Va., police cruiser pulled out of the median and raced after them. The cruiser kept pace alongside Stuart's old blue GMC Yukon for a while, then followed behind for several miles before turning on its flashing lights.

The traffic stop on that balmy afternoon in August 2012 was the beginning of a dizzying encounter that would leave Stuart shaken and wondering whether he had been singled out because he was black and had a police record.

Over the next two hours, he would be detained without charges, handcuffed and taken to a nearby police station. He also would be stripped of $17,550 in cash - money that he had earned through Smoking Roosters, a small barbecue restaurant he owned in Staunton, Va. Stuart said he was going to use the money that night for supplies and equipment.

The reason for the police stop: Stuart's SUV had tinted windows and a video was playing in his sightline. He was never charged with a crime, and there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing. But police took his money because they assumed it was related to the drug trade.

Stuart would have to fight the federal government for any chance of getting his money back.

"Why didn't he just give me a ticket?" Stuart asked the prosecutor. "What was the reason for him harassing me as much as he did?"

Stuart's case is among 400 seizures from 17 states examined by The Washington Post to assess how the practice known as "highway interdiction" has affected American drivers. Their experiences, gleaned from legal papers and interviews, contain striking similarities that underscore questions about police power in an era when security has often trumped the rights of individuals.

Many of the highway officers involved were trained in the techniques of interdiction after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, some with financial support from the departments of Homeland Security and Justice. The officers were able to seize cash and have their departments share in the proceeds through a long-standing Justice Department civil asset-forfeiture program known as Equitable Sharing. Police can also make seizures under their states' laws.

Their methods often involve the use of minor traffic infractions as pretexts for stops; an analysis of "indicators" about drivers' intentions, such as nervousness; a request for warrantless searches; and a focus on cash. In most of the cases, police never make an arrest.

Too lazy to copy-paste the whole thing: http://www.stwnewspress.com/cnhi_network/article_daf14bbf-a3d4-51cb-9013-73b55f00edd7.html
 
Yup, disgusting... Mafia, police, really no difference. It truly is just like prohibition a century ago.

Oh, wait... It IS prohibition! ...
 
Police seizures of cash rise, fueled by private training firms
By Michael Sallah and Robert O’Harrow Jr. | Washington Post September 14, 2014 (Article taken from Boston Globe)

After the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the government called on police to become the eyes and ears of homeland security on America’s highways.
Local officers, county deputies, and state troopers were encouraged to act more aggressively in searching for suspicious people, drugs, and other contraband. The departments of Homeland Security and Justice spent millions on police training.

The effort succeeded, but it had an impact that has been largely hidden from public view: the spread of an intense brand of policing that has spurred the seizure of hundreds of millions of dollars in cash from motorists and others not charged with crimes, a Washington Post investigation found. Thousands of people have been forced to fight legal battles that can last more than a year to get their money back. Behind the rise in seizures is a little-known cottage industry of private police-training firms that teach the techniques of ‘‘highway interdiction’’ to departments across the country.

One of those firms created a private intelligence network known as Black Asphalt Electronic Networking & Notification System that enabled police nationwide to share detailed reports about American motorists — criminal and innocent alike — including their Social Security numbers, addresses, and identifying tattoos, as well as hunches about which drivers to stop.
Many of the reports have been funneled to federal agencies and fusion centers as part of the government’s burgeoning law enforcement intelligence systems — despite warnings from state and federal authorities that the information could violate privacy and constitutional protections.

‘All of our home towns are sitting on a tax-liberating gold mine.’

A thriving subculture of road officers on the network now competes to see who can seize the most cash and contraband, describing their exploits in the network’s chat rooms. Some police advocate highway interdiction as a way of raising revenue for cash-strapped municipalities. Deputy Ron Hain of Kane County, Ill., wrote in a self-published book under a pseudonym. Hain is a marketing specialist for Desert Snow, a leading interdiction training firm based in Guthrie, Okla., whose founders also created Black Asphalt.

Hain’s book calls for ‘‘turning our police forces into present-day Robin Hoods.’’

Cash seizures can be made under state or federal civil law. One of the primary ways police departments are able to seize money and share in the proceeds at the federal level is through a long-standing Justice Department civil asset forfeiture program known as Equitable Sharing. Asset forfeiture is a powerful law enforcement tool that allows the government to take cash and property without pressing criminal charges and then requires the owner to prove their possessions were legally acquired.

The practice has been controversial since its inception at the height of the drug war more than three decades ago, and its abuses have been the subject of journalistic exposes and congressional hearings. But unexplored until now is the role of the federal government and the private police trainers in encouraging officers to target cash on the nation’s highways since 9/11.
To examine the scope of asset forfeiture since the terror attacks, the Post analyzed a database of hundreds of thousands of seizure records at the Justice Department, reviewed hundreds of federal court cases, obtained internal records from training firms, and interviewed scores of police, prosecutors, and motorists.

The Post found that there have been 61,998 cash seizures made on highways and elsewhere since 9/11 without search warrants or indictments through the Equitable Sharing Program, totaling more than $2.5 billion.

State and local authorities kept more than $1.7 billion of that while Justice, Homeland Security, and other federal agencies received $800 million. Half of the seizures were below $8,800.

Only a sixth of the seizures were legally challenged, in part because of the costs of legal action against the government. But in 41 percent of cases — 4,455 — where there was a challenge, the government agreed to return money. The appeals process took more than a year in 40 percent of those cases and often required owners of the cash to sign agreements not to sue police over the seizures.
 
Total bullshit but nothing new, I am honestly pretty surprised there hasn't been a lot more public out cry about this in the US than it seems there has been. These laws are fucking ridiculous and so transparently corrupt.
 
Reminds me of the time i got pulled over headed north toward houston a few years ago. Same thing happened a small county "sheriff K9" unit pulled me over because "it looked like I was going too fast". Exactly the same shit, pulled out from the median, passed me up then slowed down and got behind me. He asked for permission to search, i said i wanted to make it before sundown (i was 2 hours from Houston, 6pm, sunset @8pm..). Well because he was a "K9" he got his trained doggy to scratch my door supposedly "alerting". I had no drugs and i was in my dad's car.. (he doesn't do drugs, no weed had been smoked in it since he owned it), total bullshit. Well at 7:20 pm he finally gave up after searching for 1 hour 20 mins and gave me a warning for "speeding" (no radar speed, and i was actually going the speed limit..). No apologies for wasting my time or making me stand on the side of the road in 110 degree heat index weather for 80 mins.

That's how i learned the REAL reason for "K9" units.. to make bullshit probable cause for a search when they make a stop.
 
Exactly. I've logged some serious driving time, Baltimore to LA twice and up and down the east coast. I've had a bunch of incidents of cops fishing for any reason to tear the car apart. And the one time they asked to search and I said no they brought a drug dog too and sure enough it so called alerted to my trunk which they said gave them probable cause. This was in Tenn by the way....but they cuffed me put me in the back of the cruiser and before they searched they asked if I had any large amounts of currency, which I kinda did BC I was driving cross country like 500 in cash mostly 20s in a bank envelope.

But they tore my car apart and didn't even find the weed I had stashed in the front behind the cup holder that popped up. Right then I knew the cop with the dog did something to make the dog alert to the back of the car. I was riding low since I had about two weeks worth of my luggage in the back.

I guess they expected to find a bale of weed or heroin and a bunch of money. A lot of ppl said I prob got pulled over BC of my Maryland tags...he got me for not using my blinker when changing lanes and driving too close to a tractor trailer..such bullshit. I was in the cruiser for like 45 mins while they searched.

I thought for sure they would discover the cup holder pops up with some force to reveal a space big enough for two ounces of bud. But I had it in a glass jar with an airtight top.

No sorry or anything, its like they were pissed they couldn't find anything. And had they found my like 8th of bud I'm sure it would have been a win for them in the war on drugs. They would have taken my car, traveling money...which they asked about. Oh you said earlier you didn't have a large amount of currency, I said yea I don't I didn't think 500 bucks was considered a large sum considering I'm driving to Los Angeles.

I don't know if all southern cops are like that but it wouldn't surprise me if they were...all cops love to go fishing. Its sickening they make a game out of it too..
 
Top