850 Laid Off from Chicago Schools, 3,783 in Philly: But $500 Million for Prisons

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
http://politic365.com/2013/06/18/85...d-3783-in-philly-but-500-million-for-prisons/

54 schools closed in Chicago (88% black), 23 closed in Philadelphia (81% black), 26 in New York (60% black). What’s the difference between the Democrats and Republicans again I forgot? Hundreds of teachers and school staff are being laid off in two of the largest cities in the country — both run by Democrats. In Chicago and Philadelphia, a total of 4,633 people, including many teachers, will lose their jobs.

Both cities, run by Democrats, claim they are closing schools because they need the money. Yet near both cities, money for prisons is somehow found. In Philadelphia, Republican Governor Tom Corbett magically found $400 million for State Correctional Institutions Phoenix I and II which will be the second most expensive prison complex in the state’s history. But the will to build prisons is not just a Republicans obsession.

Plenty of political energy by various Democrats, and the Obama Administration, is going into continuing to fund federal prisons in Illinois and Chicago. For three years straight, the Obama Administration has requested more money for federal prisons. In this year’s budget request, the Obama Administration asked for a budget increase for the third year in a row. The federal prison budget is now $8.6 billion. Obama has now surpassed Bush in funding prisons and the number of federal prisons incarcerated — 219,000 — half on drug related crimes. The total prison population topped 2 million in 2003 and shows no sign of decreasing even though states are running out of money to jail people.

In Chicago, where 41 people where shot and 7 killed over the weekend, the Clinton Global Initiative discussed many issues: None of them having directly to do with youth or gang violence. Activists may want to take careful note of the fact that it was President Clinton who ushered in a massive crime bill that would help make the U.S. number one in the world in incarceration. The legislation also continued the war on drugs. Will Hillary Clinton, who is all but certain to run in 2016, endorse the same policies?

Thomson Correctional Facility can house 1,800 people. The closing of 54 Chicago Public Schools effected 30,000 students and 850 jobs. Last October, Sen. Durbin announced that the federal government would by the prison for $165,000. The need for jobs is a frequently used justification for building prisons. But how does it make sense to lay off 850 people from the Chicago School System while at the same time spending $170 million prison 150 miles away?

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel yucked it up about the Blackhawks with Bill Clinton on MSNBC last week. Emanuel mentioned “parenting” as a key issue to stop Chicago’s youth violence problem. What he didn’t mention was the lack of funding for prevention and over criminalization in the role of Chicago’s problem. Since Mayor Emanuel is President Obama’s former chief of staff, there is almost no reaction from civil rights “leaders” on the school closing or Chicago’s violence problem. After bragging during the same interview that Chicago’s murder rate has dropped since 2012 — 41 people were shot over father’s day weekend in Chiacgo.

http://politic365.com/2013/06/18/85...d-3783-in-philly-but-500-million-for-prisons/
 
First there was Escape from NY, then Escape from LA, and next will be Escape from US
 
The US has made its priorities clear: It is better to punish people for using chemicals in search of happiness than to educate people (especially black people) in order to create a better future.

The two parties are barely distinguishable (though Republicans do seem to spit a bit more when they talk).
The government has become the enemy of the people.
It does not strive to help create a situation in which individuals may seek happiness.

Good thing that some of us recognize this, but I fear that the government cannot continue to pursue such evil policies without a massive uprising which may lead to the loss of many lives.

Even the leading liberal puppet has no power or desire to change the situation.

Things will get worse before they get better.
 
Good thing that some of us recognize this, but I fear that the government cannot continue to pursue such evil policies without a massive uprising which may lead to the loss of many lives.

They can continue to pursue the policies indefinitely, so long as they primarily pursue them against minorities and drug users. The people will not revolt. Most individuals have too much to lose now, and many of the ones without much to lose are filed away in prison.
 
I am glad I got out of the US when I did. I have held out hope for a long time that things would turn around, and change for the better. People always ask me, "do you plan on going back to the US?", and for a long time I said, "I don't know, but I'm not too happy with the way things are going over there, and the medical system is morally and ethically reprehensible in terms of its potential output". Now I'm pretty much like, "I will perhaps stay here in Germany, or go to wherever can offer my family what we are looking for". I love it here, but the winters are killing me lol.

The US is pretty much out of the picture now. Watching the public education system implode makes me more angry than almost anything else. I watched it start to crumble growing up in a city with a large black minority who had so little foothold to get anywhere. The area of town where most black people live has no grocery stores..plenty of fast food though, horrible roads, few gas stations, and dreadfully inadequate public schools. The funding is a joke (the sad thing is every time there is a vote to raise sales tax by a cent in order to fund the schools it never passes). Most teachers in Oklahoma have to work extra jobs to get by. Under these circumstances it is much more appealing for the good teachers to go out of state (usually Texas or California).

I think if the US would be more honest about what it is I wouldn't have such a problem, but the image it attempts to prop up is hypocritical at best.
 
public_cuts.jpg
 
I always found it odd that in America, once you're charged with a drug offence, you lose the right to vote. This is such a simple system for them, jail them - they can't vote.
 
First there was Escape from NY, then Escape from LA, and next will be Escape from US

I'm hoping someone remakes Escape from NY. Don't get me wrong, I love the original, but it would interesting to see New York transformed into a giant prison using today's special effects. I know remakes usually suck, but one can hope.
 
I always found it odd that in America, once you're charged with a drug offence, you lose the right to vote. This is such a simple system for them, jail them - they can't vote.

It depends what state you're in. In at least one state, you can vote from prison.
 
Oh I didn't know that, I was just going off what I heard in drug documentaries. That's how it should be in all states.
 
Oh I didn't know that, I was just going off what I heard in drug documentaries. That's how it should be in all states.

I absolutely agree. Taking away the vote of incarcerated people creates a situation in which people can be prosecuted just to be taken out of the electorate.

There currently are way too many incentives for the government to imprison people:

  • They get to justify tax increases.
  • They get to levy usurious fines (in Florida we even get charged rent to be in jail).
  • They get to swell their own ranks.
  • They get to keep the property of those they arrest.
  • They get to shrink the electorate of their opposition.
  • They get points for appearing tough on crime.


etc. etc.
 
^ so true, and such a terrible thing.

They can continue to pursue the policies indefinitely, so long as they primarily pursue them against minorities and drug users. The people will not revolt. Most individuals have too much to lose now, and many of the ones without much to lose are filed away in prison.

Having an under-educated underclass that is primarily composed of minorities seems to be a bad plan if you want a stable government.
It makes more sense to allow everyone to prosper - the pursuit of happiness - in order to create a livable country. (Also what the people want, so it is a win-win situation.)
I wouldn't necessarily predict an uprising any time soon, but these kinds of decisions inevitably lead to dissatisfaction with the status quo - one which gets stronger after a decade or two when the kids grow up.
 
Top