6 Boston cops fired for cocaine have been reinstated--with back pay

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/03/cops_firing_for_drugs_reversed

Six Boston cops fired after testing positive for cocaine have been ordered reinstated — with back pay — after a state board struck down hair tests as 
unreliable in a bombshell ruling that could have a far-reaching impact on how city workers are drug-tested.

In a stunning, 134-page ruling, the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission this week ordered the six cops back on the job, finding that “the present state of hair testing for drugs of abuse ... does not meet the standard of reliability necessary to be routinely used” to fire someone.

“Hair testing for drugs of abuse has not achieved general acceptance within the scientific or law enforcement communities,” the board wrote. “A reported positive test result is not necessarily conclusive of ingestion and ... may or may not justify termination.”

The six ex-cops — Richard Beckers, Ronnie Jones, Jacqueline McGowan, Shawn Harris, Walter Washington and George Downing — failed drug tests when cocaine showed up in their hair samples in the early to mid-2000s, records state. They all appealed and the board ruled that all should be reinstated with back pay to October 2010, which is when Civil Service took on the case.

For McGowan, the positive test was her second — and she testified before the commission that she was formerly a “regular” cocaine user, the ruling states. Attempts to reach all the officers last night were unsuccessful.

Their union-paid attorney, Alan Shapiro, called the ruling “enormously gratifying.”

“Finally, somebody that has looked at all the science of this has said, ‘No, you can’t do that,’ ” Shapiro said last night. “The science is not the holy grail that it was held out to be.”

cont. http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/03/cops_firing_for_drugs_reversed
 
some of them made excuses for their failed tests, including bridgeforth, who told the commission he may have had false positive tests because he brushed white powder off the seat of his cruiser, which he “assumed was confectionery powder from doughnuts.”

biggrin.gif
 
I think that a cop using cocaine shouldn't be automatically disqualified from their job for using.

They should be disqualified for not doing their job well; but we all know how infrequently cops lose their jobs for doing a shitty job (never; at least not in the United States).
 
^there's a big problem with police arresting people for behavior they engage in themselves

The bigger problem is the American people not caring to write letters to their local representatives when they personally disagree with the laws they live under.

Think about all the people who went to jail last year on a weed possession charge. How many do you think wrote letters to their local representatives before their charge? Probably less than 0.01%. How many wrote a letter after their charge? Probably even less.

People become complacent with the reality they live in, which leads to anger and depression.
 
i doubt the state would say that whatever form of drug testing they use for people on probation n parole are unreliable, just the form they use on their own. funny how that works

CH: i agree with you that people dont take enough of an active role as citizens

but personally i have/had written to my state and US representatives n congressmen about laws regarding marijuana and other issues, however my letters made no difference when i was arrested for possession.

again i agree that people are complacent and would rather bitch about things then actively work/fight to change them.

but the only thing i got out of writing to my representatives was a letter back saying basically thank you for writing n thank you for your opinion however we see things differently yada yada yada

now obviously if every drug user/ supporter of ending the war on drugs (hell if everyone fighting for any cause) wrote a letter/took steps to create change then things would be different but shit its hard to get any group of people organized to do just about anything ( hell i grew up in a very conservative and religious household and it was hard just to get 4 people awake and ready just to be at church on time growing up)
 
Last edited:
Of course, once again, the police being held to a different standard than the rest of society! So, I assume now, that if you're on probation and test positive for illicit drugs you won't be sent to prison because there's a chance the test results are wrong! Yeah right!

If the rest of the world gets fired for testing positive, the police should be no different!
 
but personally i have/had written to my state and US representatives n congressmen about laws regarding marijuana and other issues, however my letters made no difference when i was arrested for possession.

again i agree that people are complacent and would rather bitch about things then actively work/fight to change them.

Good for you for writing your representatives.

Everyone else: follow HighonLife's example of doing the right thing here - if we all wrote our representatives, it would go a long way.

It also goes a long way to vote for politicians that support your ideals, as well as becoming a member of the ACLU or similar civil rights organizations, or joining organizations that actively seek to change drug laws - just wanted to list these ideas for the people who are motivated to make a change in their lives. :)
 
but personally i have/had written to my state and US representatives n congressmen about laws regarding marijuana and other issues, however my letters made no difference when i was arrested for possession.

again i agree that people are complacent and would rather bitch about things then actively work/fight to change them.

but the only thing i got out of writing to my representatives was a letter back saying basically thank you for writing n thank you for your opinion however we see things differently yada yada yada

Try putting a million dollars in the envelope.
 
Of course, once again, the police being held to a different standard than the rest of society! So, I assume now, that if you're on probation and test positive for illicit drugs you won't be sent to prison because there's a chance the test results are wrong! Yeah right!
this would seem to create a precedent (in ma at least) for hair-testing for cocaine being unreliable. why wouldn't that apply to regular people if it now comes up?

alasdair
 
this would seem to create a precedent

Bingo. I hope there are lawyers ready to bring this up to the Supreme Court and set the precedence. (sorry, I just saw and old Law and Order and am a little fired up :D) That is assuming this journalism is 100% accurate, and we all know how that is. Although this situation seems cut and dry with no real room for sensationalism?
 
I didn't realize hair testing was utilized in the united states. I read somewhere that it's only used Australia as hair testing is considered inaccurate. Maybe I'm incorrect. Does someone know the answer to this?
 
this would seem to create a precedent (in ma at least) for hair-testing for cocaine being unreliable. why wouldn't that apply to regular people if it now comes up?

alasdair

^That may be the only good thing that comes out of this, and from the article it kind of seeeemed like the judge just ruled, "All drug testing too unreliable and inconclusive for the results to be viewed as fact!"..which, seems to set a precedent to fight anything that arises from a dirty urine!... .....'

I don't advocate people using drugs at work under most circumstances, but what somebody does on their own time shouldn't be a reason to fire them....I feel terrible for people who lost their jobs for occasional pot use that have children to support, bills etc. It happens all the time, and there seems to be a trend of employers being more and more "intrusive" into their employees personal lives!
 
Top